Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tibiofemoral contact mechanics following posterior root of medial meniscus tear, repair, meniscectomy, and allograft transplantation

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect on tibiofemoral contact mechanics of repair of the posterior root of the medial meniscus and the effect of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) with medial collateral ligament (MCL) release at different flexion angles.

Methods

Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (five pairs) were used. A digital pressure sensor was inserted by capsulotomy, and experiments were performed serially under the following six conditions, that is, with an intact medial meniscus (normal controls), with a root tear, after root repair, after total meniscectomy, after MAT, and after MAT plus MCL release. During each experiment, knees were positioned at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and peak pressure (kPa) and contact area (cm2) were measured.

Results

At 0° of flexion, contact pressure did not differ among the six experimental settings. However, at 30° and 60° of flexion, contact pressure differed significantly between root tear and root repair specimens (p = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively), and between total meniscectomy and MAT specimens (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). On the other hand, mean contact pressures were different between normal (476.7 ± 473.1 and 573.3 ± 479.1 kPa) and root repair (575.7 ± 357.8 and 598.6 ± 415.8), and between normal and MAT (635.7 ± 437.4 and 674.3 ± 533.2). At 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, contact areas differed significantly between normal and total meniscectomy specimens (p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively), and between MAT and total meniscectomy specimens (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.02, and 0.03, respectively). Contact areas differed significantly between root tear and root repair specimens at 60° of flexion (p = 0.04), and between normal control and root repair specimens at 60° and 90° of flexion (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). The effects of MAT plus MCL release on contact mechanics were not different from the effects of MAT alone (n.s.).

Conclusions

Both meniscal root repair and transplantation of meniscus improved contact mechanics, but it did not appear that repair of the meniscal root or transplantation of meniscus restores the biomechanical function back to normal level. The MAT plus MCL release was similar to those after MAT alone. Therefore, it is better to preserve meniscus and MCL release could be done during the MAT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Lee YS, Chang JY, Chang MJ, Eun SS, Kim SM (2009) Arthroscopic all inside repair of the lateral meniscus root tear. Knee 16:77–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn JH, Lee YS, Yoo JC, Chang MJ, Koh KH, Kim MH (2010) Clinical and second-look arthroscopic evaluation of repaired medial meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 38:472–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner CD (2008) Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1922–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker BE, Peckham AC, Pupparo F, Sanborn JC (1985) Review of meniscal injury and associated sports. Am J Sports Med 13:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bin SI, Kim JM, Shin SJ (2004) Radial tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy 20:373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brophy RH, Cottrell J, Rodeo SA, Wright TM, Warren RF, Maher SA (2010) Implantation of a synthetic meniscal scaffold improves joint contact mechanics in a partial meniscectomy cadaver model. J Biomed Mater Res A 92:1154–1161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harner CD, Mauro CS, Lesniak BP, Romanowski JR (2009) Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 2):257–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones AO, Houang MT, Low RS, Wood DG (2006) Medial meniscus posterior root attachment injury and degeneration: MRI findings. Australas Radiol 50:306–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JG, Lee YS, Lee SW, Kim YJ, Kong DH, Ko MS (2009) Arthroscopically assisted medial meniscal allograft transplantation using a modified bone plug to facilitate passage: surgical technique. J Knee Surg 22:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koenig JH, Ranawat AS, Umans HR, Difelice GS (2009) Meniscal root tears: diagnosis and treatment. Arthroscopy 25:1025–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SJ, Aadalen KJ, Malaviya P, Lorenz EP, Hayden JK, Farr J, Kang RW, Cole BJ (2006) Tibiofemoral contact mechanics after serial medial meniscectomies in the human cadaveric knee. Am J Sports Med 34:1334–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerer DB, Umans HR, Hu MX, Jones MH (2004) The role of meniscal root pathology and radial meniscal tear in medial meniscal extrusion. Skeletal Radiol 33:569–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marzo JM, Gurske-DePerio J (2009) Effects of medial meniscus posterior horn avulsion and repair on tibiofemoral contact area and peak contact pressure with clinical implications. Am J Sports Med 37:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDermott ID, Lie DT, Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2008) The effects of lateral meniscal allograft transplantation techniques on tibio-femoral contact pressures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:553–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McPoil TG, Warren M, Vicenzino B, Cornwall MW (2010) Variations in foot posture and mobility between individuals with patellofemoral pain and those in a control group. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reinisch M, Schaff P, Hauser W, Rosemeyer B (1991) Treadmill versus field trial. Movement analysis and pressure distribution in the athletic shoe. Sportverletz Sportschaden 5:60–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seo HS, Lee SC, Jung KA (2011) Second-look arthroscopic findings after repairs of posterior root tears of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 39:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein G, Koebke J, Faymonville C, Dargel J, Muller LP, Schiffer G (2011) The relationship between the medial collateral ligament and the medial meniscus: a topographical and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat 33:763–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Verma NN, Kolb E, Cole BJ, Berkson MB, Garretson R, Farr J, Fregly B (2008) The effects of medial meniscal transplantation techniques on intra-articular contact pressures. J Knee Surg 21:20–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vyas D, Harner CD (2012) Meniscus root repair. Sports Med Arthrosc 20:86–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by Korean Research Foundation (2009-0075602).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Seuk Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.G., Lee, Y.S., Bae, T.S. et al. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics following posterior root of medial meniscus tear, repair, meniscectomy, and allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2121–2125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2182-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2182-4

Keywords

Navigation