Advertisement

Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position

  • Cecilia Pascual-GarridoEmail author
  • Britta L. Swanson
  • Kyle E. Swanson
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare femoral tunnel positions after ACL reconstruction by the transtibial (TT) approach versus the low anteromedial approach using radiographs from a single surgeon.

Methods

The standard postoperative knee radiographs of 50 patients with an ACL reconstruction were studied. Two groups were determined according to the technique used. The low anteromedial portal group and the transtibial portal group. The femoral bone tunnel was identified radiographically, and its position determined in the lateral and A–P view. Coronal and sagittal obliquity of the tunnel was measured and compared among both groups.

Results

In the sagittal plane, femoral bone tunnels averaged 54° ± 6° for the TT technique and 59° ± 12° (p = 0.07) for the low anteromedial portal technique. In the coronal plane, the bone tunnels drilled through the low anteromedial portal showed a significantly more oblique femoral tunnel position (50° ± 6°) compared to TT drilling (58° ± 9°), p ≤ 0.05.

Conclusion

Drilling the femoral tunnel through the low anteromedial portal resulted in a more oblique femoral tunnel position compared to the TT technique. Clinically, the low anteromedial portal may allow to better restore the anatomic orientation of the ACL.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.

Keywords

Transtibial Low anteromedial Tunnel position ACL reconstruction 

Notes

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1013–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araujo PH, van Eck CF, Macalena JA, Fu FH (2011) Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1239–1242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27(3):380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ III (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26(3):342–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Behrend H, Stutz G, Kessler MA, Rukavina A, Giesinger K, Kuster MS (2006) Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: quality control in a teaching hospital. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1159–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–22Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowers AL, Bedi A, Lipman JD, Potter HG, Rodeo SA, Pearle AD, Warren RF, Altchek DW (2011) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel positon and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 27(11):1511–1522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang CB, Choi JY, Koh IJ, Lee KH, Kim TH (2011) Comparison of femoral tunnel position and length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques. Arthroscopy 27(10):1389–1394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang CB, Yoo JH, Chung BJ, Seong SC, Kim TK (2010) Oblique femoral tunnel placement can increase risk of short femoral tunnel and cross-pin protrusion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1237–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cole J, Brand JC Jr, Caborn DN, Johnson DL (2000) Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg 13(4):218–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colvin AC, Shen W, Musahl V, Fu FH (2009) Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(8):956–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):220–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fu FH, Karlsson J (2010) A long journey to be anatomic. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1151–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garofalo R, Moretti B, Kombot C, Moretti L, Mouhsine E (2007) Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rationale of the two incision technique. J Orthop Surg Res 2(10):1–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Liantsis A, Venouziou A, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN (2009) Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(8):880–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harner CD, Giffin JR, Dunteman RC, Annunziata CC, Friedman MJ (2001) Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 50:463–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hefzy MS, Grood ES, Noyes FR (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part II: the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17(2):208–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoser C, Tecklenburg K, Kuenzel KH, Fink C (2005) Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(4):256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Illingworth KD, Hensler D, Working ZM, Macalena JA, Tashman S, Fu FH (2011) A simple evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel position: the inclination angle and femoral tunnel angle. Am J Sports Med 39(12):2611–2618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (1996) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:100–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Mejia HA, Fu FH (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2: clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 39(9):2016–2026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, Chang CB, Park YK, Jo H, Kim CH (2007) Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(7):771–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19(3):297–304Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Group MARS, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BB, Mann BJ, Stuart MJ (2010) Descriptive epidemiology of the multicenter ACL revision study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med 38(10):1979–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament graft placement recommendations and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft indications to restore knee stability. Instr Course Lect 60:499–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT III (2004) The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 20(3):294–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E (2010) Placement of femoral tunnel between the AM and PL bundles using a transtibial technique in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1245–1251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sommer C, Friederich NF, Müller W (2000) Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(4):207–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Eck CF, Martins CA, Vyas SM, Celentano U, van Dijk CN, Fu FH (2010) Femoral intercondylar notch shape and dimensions in ACL-injured patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(9):1257–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Eck CF, Morse KR, Lesniak BP, Kropf EJ, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, Fu FH (2010) Does the lateral intercondylar ridge disappear in ACL deficient patients? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1184–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu Y, Ao Y, Wang J, Yu J, Cui G (2011) Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(7):923–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
    • 1
    Email author
  • Britta L. Swanson
    • 2
  • Kyle E. Swanson
    • 3
  1. 1.Sports Medicine and Shoulder SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Barton Lake Tahoe Sports Medicine FellowshipLake TahoeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryTahoe Orthopedics and Sports MedicineSouth Lake TahoeUSA

Personalised recommendations