Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position
- 658 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to compare femoral tunnel positions after ACL reconstruction by the transtibial (TT) approach versus the low anteromedial approach using radiographs from a single surgeon.
The standard postoperative knee radiographs of 50 patients with an ACL reconstruction were studied. Two groups were determined according to the technique used. The low anteromedial portal group and the transtibial portal group. The femoral bone tunnel was identified radiographically, and its position determined in the lateral and A–P view. Coronal and sagittal obliquity of the tunnel was measured and compared among both groups.
In the sagittal plane, femoral bone tunnels averaged 54° ± 6° for the TT technique and 59° ± 12° (p = 0.07) for the low anteromedial portal technique. In the coronal plane, the bone tunnels drilled through the low anteromedial portal showed a significantly more oblique femoral tunnel position (50° ± 6°) compared to TT drilling (58° ± 9°), p ≤ 0.05.
Drilling the femoral tunnel through the low anteromedial portal resulted in a more oblique femoral tunnel position compared to the TT technique. Clinically, the low anteromedial portal may allow to better restore the anatomic orientation of the ACL.
Level of evidence
Case series, Level IV.
KeywordsTranstibial Low anteromedial Tunnel position ACL reconstruction
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest to declare.
- 6.Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–22Google Scholar
- 7.Bowers AL, Bedi A, Lipman JD, Potter HG, Rodeo SA, Pearle AD, Warren RF, Altchek DW (2011) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel positon and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 27(11):1511–1522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Garofalo R, Moretti B, Kombot C, Moretti L, Mouhsine E (2007) Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rationale of the two incision technique. J Orthop Surg Res 2(10):1–6Google Scholar
- 15.Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Liantsis A, Venouziou A, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN (2009) Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(8):880–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19(3):297–304Google Scholar