Comparison of three non-invasive quantitative measurement systems for the pivot shift test
- 548 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different non-invasive measuring devices for the pivot shift phenomenon with reference to direct bony movement measured by an electromagnetic device rigidly attached to the tibia and femur.
A lower body cadaveric specimen was prepared to create a positive pivot shift in both knees. Twelve expert knee surgeons from worldwide performed their preferred pivot shift technique three times in each knee. After watching an instructional video, the examiners used a standardized technique to perform three additional pivot shift maneuvers in each knee. An electromagnetic tracking system, rigidly attached to femur and tibia, was used to provide reference measurements during the pivot shift test. Three different devices were correlated to the reference method and evaluated in this study: (1) Electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors; (2) Triaxial accelerometer system; (3) Simple image analysis.
When results from both pivot shift techniques (preferred and standardized) were combined, the electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors showed positive correlation with the reference measurement for acceleration and translation parameters (r = 0.88 and r = 0.67, respectively; both P < 0.01); The triaxial accelerometer system demonstrated good correlation with the reference measurement for acceleration (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). The image analysis system was poorly correlated to the translation of the reference measurement (r = 0.24; P < 0.01).
The electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors provided the best correlation with the reference method. The triaxial accelerometer showed also a good correlation and the image analysis system showed a positive, but poor correlation with the reference method. More research is needed in order to validate simple and non-invasive devices for clinical application.
KeywordsACL Pivot shift Quantitative analysis Acceleration Anterior tibial translation
The authors would like to sincerely thank the expert surgeons for their participation and inspiring comments during the study (Drs. Roland Becker, Shiyi Chen, Moises Cohen, Andreas Imhoff, Timo Jarvela, Jon Karlsson, Masahiro Kurosaka, Benjamin Ma, Willem van der Merwe, Philippe Neyret, Robert Smigielski, Stefano Zaffagnini).
Supplementary material 1 (WMV 5,476 kb)
- 12.Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Debandi A, Kato Y, Saeki K, Asai S, Goto B, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2011) Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1233–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2008) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):270–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Fujita N, Tei K, Nishimoto K, Hoshino Y, Matsushita T, Matsumoto T, Nagamune K, Kurosaka M (2010) A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 35(3):439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Fujita N, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, Yamaguchi M, Yagi M, Matsumoto A, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Hoshino Y, Nishimoto K, Araki D, Kurosaka M (2011) Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27(7):906–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Nafis C, Jensen V, Beauregard L, Anderson P (2006) Method for estimating dynamic EM tracking accuracy of surgical navigation tools. Progr Biomed Opt Imaging—Proc SPIE 6141:152–167Google Scholar
- 24.Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Phys Ther 36(5):267–288Google Scholar