Skip to main content

Relationship between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the surgical epicondylar axis in varus and valgus knees

Abstract

Purpose

Proper rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for successful outcomes. The surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) has been frequently used to determine the femoral rotational alignment, and the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the tibia described in previous study has been introduced as a line perpendicular to the SEA in healthy knees. However, the rotational relationship between the distal femur and the proximal tibia would vary between normal and osteoarthritic knees, and a question remains whether the rotational relationship between the SEA and the AP axis of the tibia would be the same between normal and osteoarthritic knees. This study aims to determine whether the AP axis of the tibia is actually perpendicular to the SEA and useful for the tibial rotational alignment also in osteoarthritic knees.

Methods

Preoperative computed tomography scans on 25 varus and 25 valgus knees undergoing TKA were studied. The SEA and the AP axis of the tibia were identified using a three-dimensional software, and the angle between the line perpendicular to the projected SEA and the AP axis was measured.

Results

The AP axis of the tibia was 1.7° ± 4.3° and 2.0° ± 4.0° internally rotated relative to the line perpendicular to the SEA in the varus and valgus groups, respectively.

Conclusions

The AP axis of the tibia was, on average, perpendicular to the SEA in both varus and valgus knees. The AP axis would be useful for setting the tibial component with minimal rotational mismatch.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A (2008) Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2751–2755

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:213–219

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akagi M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa T, Asano T, Nakamura T (2001) Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:147–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:261–269

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruni D, Iacono F, Russo A, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bignozzi S, Bragonzoni L, Marcacci M (2010) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:710–717

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Casino D, Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N, Iacono F, Bignozzi S, Visani A, Marcacci M (2009) Knee stability before and after total and unicondylar knee replacement: in vivo kinematic evaluation utilizing navigation. J Orthop Res 27:202–207

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckhoff DG, Johnston RJ, Stamm ER, Kilcoyne RF, Wiedel JD (1994) Version of the osteoarthritic knee. J Arthroplasty 9:73–79

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Insall JN, Easley ME (2001) Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1553–1620

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis P, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Devane P (1994) Posteromedial tibial polyethylene failure in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:11–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mantas JP, Bloebaum RD, Skedros JG, Hofmann AA (1992) Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7:531–535

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R, Iwamoto Y (2004) Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 22:104–109

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y (2001) Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 14:152–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagamine R, Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS (1994) Patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. The effect of tibial tray malrotation and articular surface configuration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:262–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Su EP, Su SL, Della Valle AG (2010) Stiffness after TKR: how to avoid repeat surgery. Orthopedics 33:658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun T, Lu H, Hong N, Wu J, Feng C (2009) Bony landmarks and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty for Chinese osteoarthritic knees with varus or valgus deformities. J Arthroplasty 24:427–431

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Urabe K, Mahoney OM, Mabuchi K, Itoman M (2008) Morphologic differences of the distal femur between Caucasian and Japanese women. J Orthop Surg 16:312–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Verlinden C, Uvin P, Labey L, Luyckx JP, Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H (2010) The influence of malrotation of the femoral component in total knee replacement on the mechanics of patellofemoral contact during gait: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:737–742

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:31–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y (2001) Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 16:493–497

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:873–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichi Matsuda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawahara, S., Matsuda, S., Okazaki, K. et al. Relationship between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the surgical epicondylar axis in varus and valgus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 2077–2081 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1826-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1826-0

Keywords

  • Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
  • Surgical epicondylar axis (SEA)
  • The anteroposterior (AP) axis of the tibia
  • Varus
  • Valgus
  • Rotational mismatch