Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The use of hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery has become more and more common. The purposes of this study were to determine whether anthropomorphic measurement correlated with tendon sizes in Chinese patient group and whether tendon sizes in Chinese and Caucasian patient groups differed.

Methods

From 2008 to 2009, 100 patients that received double-bundle ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons were prospectively enrolled. The original lengths and triple-folded graft diameters of the individual semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (Gr) tendons were recorded and correlated with the anthropometric data (height, weight, body mass index, gender, thigh length, shank length, leg length and bilateral thigh circumference) of the patients. Later, using height for predictions, the original heights of patients were added to the equations previously used for regression models to compare the tendon lengths in different ethnic groups.

Results

After stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, the height and leg lengths showed greatest correlation with the lengths of both tendons. The lengths of both the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in Caucasian patients were significantly longer than in the Chinese patients.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that anthropomorphic measurements (height and leg length) correlated with tendon lengths. In addition, Caucasians had significantly longer hamstring tendons than the Chinese patients.

Level of evidence

Prospective cohort study (prevalence), Level I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett RJ, Clatworthy MG, Nguyen TN (2001) Graft selection in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:625–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G (2008) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 24:1336–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carneiro M, Navarro RD, Nakama GY, Barretto JM, de Queiroz AA, Luzo MV (2009) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts-fixation with two interference screws: technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:321–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CH, Chang CH, Su CI, Wang KC, Liu HT, Yu CM, Wong CB, Wang IC (2010) Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft: clinical outcome at 2 to 7 years. Arthroscopy 26:907–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chhabra A, Starman JS, Ferretti M, Vidal AF, Zantop T, Fu FH (2006) Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):2–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M, Debski RE (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gill SS, Turner MA, Battaglia TC, Leis HT, Balian G, Miller MD (2004) Semitendinosus regrowth: biochemical, ultrastructural, and physiological characterization of the regenerate tendon. Am J Sports Med 32:1173–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamada M, Shino K, Mitsuoka T, Abe N, Horibe S (1998) Cross-sectional area measurement of the semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 14:696–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Limitlaohaphan C, Kijkunasatian C, Saitongdee P (2009) Length of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and the relationship of graft length and leg length. J Med Assoc Thai 92(Suppl 6):S200–S203

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luk KM, Wong NM, Cheng JC (2008) Anthropometry of the patellar tendon in Chinese. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16:39–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maeda A, Shino K, Horibe S, Nakata K, Buccafusca G (1996) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multistranded autogenous semitendinosus tendon. Am J Sports Med 24:504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reinhardt KR, Hetsroni I, Marx RG (2010) Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 41:249–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C (2008) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 37:157–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sonnery-Cottet B, Lavoie F, Ogassawara R, Scussiato RG, Kidder JF, Chambat P (2010) Selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tears: a series of 36 patients with mean 24 months follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34:787–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan JL, Chang PC, Mitra AK, Tay BK (1998) Anthropometry of anterior cruciate ligament in Singaporean Chinese. Ann Acad Med Singapore 27:776–779

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36:2204–2209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:1945–1949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasumoto M, Deie M, Sunagawa T, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2006) Predictive value of preoperative 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao J, He Y, Wang J (2007) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 23:766–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiao-Li Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiang, ER., Ma, HL., Wang, ST. et al. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 916–921 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1653-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1653-3

Keywords

Navigation