Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical axis-derived femoral component rotation in extramedullary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between femoral transverse axis and transepicondylar axis

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Correct rotational alignment of the femoral component is paramount to the success of total knee arthroplasty, but debate continues as to which method is the most reliable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mechanical axis-derived rotational axis of the femoral component using an extramedullary femoral alignment guide system.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2010, 60 patients (120 knees) underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Postoperative CT scans were performed on all 120 knees. The mechanical axis-derived rotational axis of the femoral component was compared with the surgical transepicondylar axis on CT scans.

Results

The femoral component was externally rotated compared with the surgical transepicondylar axis (mean = 1.6°, SD = 2.2°, range: from 4.8° of internal rotation to 7.9° of external rotation). One hundred and nine of the 120 knees (90.8%) were rotated by less than 5° from the surgical transepicondylar axis. All inter-observer observations on CT scans were within a range of ±2.1° and showed no significant differences.

Conclusion

Mechanical axis-derived rotational axis of the femoral component was found to be closely related to the surgical transepicondylar axis, to an extent which suggests that the mechanical axis-derived rotational axis could be a new alternative option in determining optimal rotational alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A (2008) Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2751–2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 336:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1331–1334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cates HE, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:32–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Classen T, Landgraeber S, Wegner A, Muller RD, von Knoch M (2011) Femoral component rotation in patients with leg axis deviation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engh GA, Petersen TL (1990) Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fehring TK (2000) Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Galaud B, Beaufils P, Michaut M, Abadie P, Fallet L, Boisrenoult P (2008) Distal femoral torsion: comparison of CT scan and intra operative navigation measurements during total knee arthroplasty. A report of 70 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:573–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN (1981) The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:94–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horton GA, Reckling FW (1995) Femoral pulse as a guide to the mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:780–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:194–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kinzel V, Ledger M, Shakespeare D (2005) Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 12:293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lustig S, Lavoie F, Selmi TA, Servien E, Neyret P (2008) Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:674–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moon YW, Seo JG, Lim SJ, Yang JH (2010) Variability in femoral component rotation reference axes measured during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty using gap technique. J Arthroplasty 25:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Perlick L, Bathis H, Perlick C, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J (2005) Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:168–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seo JG, Kim BK, Moon YW, Kim JH, Yoon BH, Ahn TK, Lee DH (2009) Bony landmarks for determining the mechanical axis of the femur in the sagittal plane during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 1:128–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seo JG, Lim JS, Lee HI, Woo KJ (2010) An extramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty using the inter-femoral head center distance. J Korean Orthop Assoc 45:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2276–2280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2006) The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Song EK, Seon JK (2004) The accuracy of lower extremity alignment in a total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation system. J Korean Orthop Assoc 39:566–571

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stiehl JB, Cherveny PM (1996) Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shaft axis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:47–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Talbot S, Bartlett J (2008) The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:258–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr (1995) The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:117–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H, Yamano Y (2002) Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402:196–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J (2009) A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:683–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Walmsley T (1933) The vertical axes of the femur and their relations. A contribution to the study of the erect position. J Anat 67:284–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Tang WM (2007) How precise is the determination of rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study. J Arthroplasty 22:1042–1048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yercan HS, Ait Si Selmi T, Sugun TS, Neyret P (2005) Tibiofemoral instability in primary total knee replacement: a review Part 2: diagnosis, patient evaluation, and treatment. Knee 12:336–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yercan HS, Ait Si Selmi T, Sugun TS, Neyret P (2005) Tibiofemoral instability in primary total knee replacement: a review, Part 1: basic principles and classification. Knee 12:257–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y (2001) Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 16:493–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yoshioka Y, Cooke TD (1987) Femoral anteversion: assessment based on function axes. J Orthop Res 5:86–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:873–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 135-710, Korea

    Jai-Gon Seo, Young-Wan Moon, Ji-Soon Lim, Se-Jun Park & Sang-Min Kim

Authors
  1. Jai-Gon Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Young-Wan Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji-Soon Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Se-Jun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sang-Min Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Min Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seo, JG., Moon, YW., Lim, JS. et al. Mechanical axis-derived femoral component rotation in extramedullary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between femoral transverse axis and transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 538–545 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1597-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1597-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation