Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance: balance, proprioception, coordination, and muscular power

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Prophylactic knee braces are largely used in the prevention of ligament injuries, but their effectiveness on performance are still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which brace was the most effective on functional performance.

Method

Twenty-four healthy subjects (14 men and 10 women), between the age of 18 and 22 with no prior history of lower limb injury and brace use, voluntarily participated in this study. Five different prophylactic knee braces were used. The test protocol consisted of dynamic balance, jumping performance, proprioception, coordination, and maximal force. Balance was assessed by the Y balance test; jumping performance was assessed by vertical jump and one-leg hop tests; maximal force, proprioception, and coordination were assessed by using functional squat testing. Proprioceptive test was performed by using the functional squat system machine that the participants were instructed to keep the crosshair on the line, even after the visual aid had disappeared. The subjects without a brace and with the brace by using 5 different braces (DonJoy-USA) were evaluated by five different therapists.

Results

Hinged “H” buttress for the support of the knee brace was found to be more effective than the others in terms of balance. Drytex economy hinged knee brace had the best result in terms of proprioception and maximal force. There were no significant differences in vertical jump and one-leg hop tests (n.s.).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the hinged “H” buttress for support of the knee brace and Drytex economy hinged knee brace produced the best results on the performance parameters. The other three braces demonstrated more variable and less optimal results. Prophylactic knee braces can be used for both healthy subjects and athletes to enhance proprioception, coordination, maximal force, and balance, but it is important to choose the best proper brace to the individuals according to their fitness level.

Level of evidence

(Economic and decision analysis—developing an economic or decision model), Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ageberg E, Zätterström R, Moritz U (1998) Stabilometry and one-leg hop test have high test-retest reliability. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:198–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Albright JP, Powell JW, Smith W, Martindale A, Crowley E, Monroe J, Miller R, Connolly J, Hill BA, Miller D et al (1994) Medial collateral ligament knee sprains in college football: brace wear preferences and injury risk. Am J Sports Med 22:2–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Albright JP, Saterbak A, Stokes J (1995) Use of knee braces in sport. Current recommendations. Sports Med 20:281–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. BenGal S, Lowe J, Mann G, Finsterbush A, Matan Y (1997) The role of the knee brace in the prevention of anterior knee pain syndrome. Am J Sports Med 25:118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Borsa PA, Lephart SM, Fu FH (1993) Muscular and functional performance characteristics of individuals wearing prophylactic knee braces. J Athl Train 28:336–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chew KT, Lew HL, Date E, Fredericson M (2007) Current evidence and clinical applications of therapeutic knee braces. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86:678–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deppen RJ, Landfried MJ (1994) Efficacy of prophylactic knee bracing in high school football players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20:243–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Erickson AR, Yasuda K, Beynnon B, Johnson R, Pope M (1993) An in vitro dynamic evaluation of prophylactic knee braces during lateral impact loading. Am J Sports Med 21:26–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleming BC, Renstrom PA, Beynnon BD, Engstrom B, Peira G (2000) The influence of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate strain biomechanics in weight-bearing knees. Am J Sports Med 28:815–824

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. France EP, Paulos LE (1994) Knee Bracing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:281–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujiwara LM, Perrin DH, Buxton BP (1990) The effect of three lateral knee braces on speed and agility in experienced and non-experienced wearers. Athl Train 25:160–161

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grace TG, Skipper BJ, Newberry JC, Nelson MA, Sweetser ER, Rothman ML (1988) Prophylactic knee braces and injury to the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:422–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene DL, Hamson KR, Bay RC, Bryce CD (2000) Effects of protective knee bracing on speed and agility. Am J Sports Med 28:453–459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardin GT, Farr J, Stiene HA (1993) Prophylactic knee braces for football: do they work? Indiana Med 86:308–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Houston ME, Goemans PH (1982) Leg muscle performance of athletes with and without knee support braces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63:431–432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaminski TW, Perrin DH (1996) Effect of prophylactic knee bracing on balance and joint position sense. J Athl Train 31:131–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kramer JF, Dubowitz T, Fowler P, Schachter C, Birmingham T (1997) Functional knee braces and dynamic performance: a review. Clin J Sport Med 7:32–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinzey SJ, Armstrong CW (1998) The reliability of the star-excursion test in assessing dynamic balance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:356–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liggett CL, Tandy RD, Young JC (1995) The effects of prophylactic knee bracing on running gait. J Athl Train 30:159–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maffiuletti NA, Bizzini M, Schatt S, Munzinger U (2005) A multi-joint lower-limb tracking-trajectory test for the assessment of motor coordination. Neurosci Lett 384:106–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moir G, Shastri P, Connaboy C (2008) Intersession reliability of vertical jump height in women and men. J Strength Cond Res 22:1779–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Najibi S, Albright JP (2005) The use of knee braces, part 1: Prophylactic knee braces in contact sports. Am J Sports Med 33:602–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Osternig LR, Robertson RN (1993) Effects of prophylactic knee bracing on lower extremity joint position and muscle activation during running. Am J Sports Med 21:733–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Paluska SA, McKeag DB (2000) Knee braces: current evidence and clinical recommendations for their use. Am Fam Physician 61(411–8):423–424

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paluska SA, McKeag DB (1999) Using patellofemoral braces for anterior knee pain. Phys Sportsmed 27:81–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Paluska SA, McKeag DB (1999) Prescribing functional braces for knee instability. Phys Sportsmed 27:117–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pietrosimone BG, Grindstaff TL, Linens SW, Uczekaj E, Hertel J (2008) A systematic review of prophylactic braces in the prevention of knee ligament injuries in collegiate football players. J Athl Train 43:409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Podesta L, Sherman MF (1988) Knee bracing. Orthop Clin North Am 19:737–745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Risberg MA, Beynnon BD, Peura GD, Uh BS (1999) Proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without bracing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:303–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rishiraj N, Taunton JE, Lloyd-Smith R, Woollard R, Regan W, Clement DB (2009) The potential role of prophylactic/functional knee bracing in preventing knee ligament injury. Sports Med 39:937–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rovere GD, Clarke TJ, Yates CS (1988) Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilisers in preventing ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 16:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rovere GD, Haupt HA, Yates CS (1987) Prophylactic knee bracing in college football. Am J Sports Med 15:111–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sforzo GA, Chen NM, Gold CA, Frye PA (1989) The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21:254–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sitler M, Ryan J, Hopkinson W, Wheeler J, Santomier J, Kolb R, Polley D (1990) The efficacy of a prophylactic knee brace to reduce knee injuries in football. A prospective, randomized study at West Point. Am J Sports Med 18:310–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Tiggelen D, Witvrouw E, Roget P, Cambier D, Danneels L, Verdonk R (2004) Effect of bracing on the prevention of anterior knee pain–a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:434–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Veldhuizen JW, Verstappen FT, Koene FM, Greep JM (1994) Effects of cast-bracing of the knee on physical performance in healthy subjects. Int J Sports Med 15:520–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors specially thank Smith & Nephew, DonJoy Inc. Carlsbad, California, for providing all braces according to subjects’ size.

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments, other benefits, commitments, or agreements from a commercial entity to provide such benefits. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated. Braces were provided by Smith & Nephew, DonJoy Inc. Carlsbad, California.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey

    Gul Baltaci, Gulcan Aktas, Elif Camci, Sevim Oksuz, Seda Yildiz & Tugce Kalaycioglu

Authors
  1. Gul Baltaci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gulcan Aktas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elif Camci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sevim Oksuz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seda Yildiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tugce Kalaycioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gul Baltaci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baltaci, G., Aktas, G., Camci, E. et al. The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance: balance, proprioception, coordination, and muscular power. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 1722–1728 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1491-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1491-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation