Abstract
Study design
Descriptive laboratory study.
Purpose
The femoral anatomic insertion site and the optimal isometric point of popliteus tendon for posterolateral reconstruction are not well known. Purpose of this study was to determine the relative relationship between the femoral anatomic insertion and isometric point of popliteus muscle–tendon complex with the lateral epicondyle of femur.
Methods
Thirty unpaired cadaveric knees were dissected to determine the anatomic femoral insertion of the popliteus tendon. The distance and the angle from the lateral epicondyle of femur to the center of the anatomic insertion of the popliteus tendon were measured using digital caliper and goniometer. Eight unpaired fresh cadaveric knees were examined to determine the optimal isometric point of femoral insertion of popliteus tendon using computer-controlled motion capture analysis system (Motion Analysis, CA, USA). Distances from targeted tibial tunnel for popliteus tendon reconstruction to the 35 points gained on the lateral surface of femur were recorded at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120° knee flexion. A point with the least excursion (<2.0 mm) was determined as the isometric point.
Results
The center of anatomic insertion points and the optimal isometric point for the main fibers of popliteus tendon were found to be posterior and distal to the lateral epicondyle of femur. The distance from the lateral epicondyle of femur to the center of anatomic femoral insertion of popliteus tendon was 11.3 ± 1.2 mm (mean ± SD). The angle between long axis of femur and the line from lateral epicondyle of femur to anatomic femoral insertion of popliteus tendon was 31.4 ± 5.3°. The isometric points for the femoral insertion of popliteus muscle–tendon complex were situated posterior and distal to the lateral epicondyle in all 8 knees. The distance between the least excursion point and the lateral epicondyle was calculated as 10.4 ± 1.7 mm. The angle between the long axis of femur and the line from lateral epicondyle of femur to optimum isometric point of popliteus tendon was calculated as 41.3 ± 14.9°.
Conclusion
The optimal isometric point for the femoral insertion of popliteus muscle–tendon complex is situated posterior and distal to the lateral epicondyle of femur. Femoral tunnel for “posterolateral corner sling procedure” should be placed at this point to achieve least amount of graft excursion during knee motion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albright JP, Brown AW (1998) Management of chronic posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee: surgical technique for the posterolateral corner sling procedure. Instr Course Lect 47:369–378
Baker CL Jr, Norwood LA, Hughston JC (1983) Acute posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:614–618
Basmajian JV, Lovejoy JF Jr (1971) Functions of the popliteus muscle in man. A multifactorial electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:557–562
Brinkman JM, Schwering PJ, Blankevoort L, Kooloos JG, Luites J, Wymenga AB (2005) The insertion geometry of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1364–1368
Covey DC (2001) Injuries of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:106–118
DeLee JC, Riley MB, Rockwood CA Jr (1983) Acute posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. Am J Sports Med 11:199–207
Fanelli GC (2005) Surgical reconstruction for acute posterolateral injury of the knee. J Knee Surg 18:157–162
Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151
Harner CD, Vogrin TM, Hoher J, Ma CB, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Deficiency of the posterolateral structures as a cause of graft failure. Am J Sports Med 28:32–39
Hughston JC, Jacobson KE (1985) Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:351–359
Jung GH, Kim JD, Kim H (2010) Location and classification of popliteus tendon’s origin: cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1027–1032
Kannus P (1989) Nonoperative treatment of grade II and III sprains of the lateral ligament compartment of the knee. Am J Sports Med 17:83–88
Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC (1993) Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21:132–136
Kim SJ, Park IS, Cheon YM, Ryu SW (2004) New technique for chronic posterolateral instability of the knee: posterolateral reconstruction using the tibialis posterior tendon allograft. Arthroscopy 20(Suppl 2):195–200
LaPrade RF (2005) Anatomic reconstruction of the posterolateral aspect of the knee. J Knee Surg 18:167–171
LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L (2003) The posterolateral attachments of the knee: a qualitative and quantitative morphologic analysis of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, and lateral gastrocnemius tendon. Am J Sports Med 31:854–860
LaPrade RF, Resig S, Wentorf F, Lewis JL (1999) The effects of grade III posterolateral knee complex injuries on anterior cruciate ligament graft force. A biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 27:469–475
LaPrade RF, Wozniczka JK, Stellmaker MP, Wijdicks CA (2010) Analysis of the static function of the popliteus tendon and evaluation of an anatomic reconstruction: the “fifth ligament” of the knee. Am J Sports Med 38:543–549
Lee MC, Park YK, Lee SH, Jo H, Seong SC (2003) Posterolateral reconstruction using split Achilles tendon allograft. Arthroscopy 19:1043–1049
Levy BA, Dajani KA, Whelan DB, Stannard JP, Fanelli GC, Stuart MJ, Boyd JL, MacDonald PA, Marx RG (2009) Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: an evidence-based systematic review. Arthroscopy 25:430–438
Markolf KL, Wascher DC, Finerman GA (1993) Direct in vitro measurement of forces in the cruciate ligaments. Part II: the effect of section of the posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:387–394
Nau T, Chevalier Y, Hagemeister N, Deguise JA, Duval N (2005) Comparison of 2 surgical techniques of posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee. Am J Sports Med 33:1838–1845
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Roberts CS (1994) Use of allografts after failed treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1019–1031
O’Brien SJ, Warren RF, Pavlov H, Panariello R, Wickiewicz TL (1991) Reconstruction of the chronically insufficient anterior cruciate ligament with the central third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:278–286
Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA (1986) Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 14:35–38
Sigward SM, Markolf KL, Graves BR, Chacko JM, Jackson SR, McAllister DR (2007) Femoral fixation sites for optimum isometry of posterolateral reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2359–2368
Staubli HU, Birrer S (1990) The popliteus tendon and its fascicles at the popliteal hiatus: gross anatomy and functional arthroscopic evaluation with and without anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy 6:209–220
Stoeckl B, Nogler M, Krismer M, Beimel C, de la Barrera JL, Kessler O (2006) Reliability of the transepicondylar axis as an anatomical landmark in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:878–882
Veltri DM, Warren RF (1994) Operative treatment of posterolateral instability of the knee. Clin Sports Med 13:615–627
Watanabe Y, Moriya H, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Sonoda M, Shimada Y, Tamaki T (1993) Functional anatomy of the posterolateral structures of the knee. Arthroscopy 9:57–62
Yoon KH, Bae DK, Ha JH, Park SW (2006) Anatomic reconstructive surgery for posterolateral instability of the knee. Arthroscopy 22:159–165
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, JH., Lim, H.C., Bae, J.H. et al. Anatomic and isometric points on femoral attachment site of popliteus muscle–tendon complex for the posterolateral corner reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 1669–1674 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1442-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1442-z