Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Femoral component rotation in patients with leg axis deviation

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Correct alignment of the rotation of the femoral component and the flexion gap after total knee arthroplasty is difficult in patients with preoperative leg axis deviation. Inaccuracy may result in problems with the patellofemoral joint and instability, in particular. We examined the influence of the preoperative leg axis on the rotation of the femoral component and the symmetry of the flexion gap after total knee arthroplasty using the tibial-cut-first technique.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out of 58 consecutive patients who underwent primary LCS total knee arthroplasty using the tibial-cut-first technique in 2008 based on preoperative full-leg radiographs and the final radiographs taken according to Kanekasu’s technique. The patients were divided into three groups (varus–valgus–neutral) according to their preoperative leg axis.

Results

Using the tibial-cut-first technique, a mean neutral rotation of the femoral component of 0.5° and a mean symmetrical flexion gap of −0.7° were achieved. Nevertheless, there was a positive correlation of the preoperative leg axis with the rotation of the femoral component. The differences in the rotation of the femoral component and the flexion gap between the three groups were not significant. The only significant difference between the varus and valgus groups was the extent of rotation of the femoral component, with a slightly greater external rotation of 2.7° in the valgus group.

Conclusions

This study suggests that it is possible to achieve correct rotational alignment of the femoral component and a symmetrical flexion gap using the tibial-cut-first technique in patients with a preoperatively deviated leg axis.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic, Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A (2008) Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2751–2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron HU, Jung YB (1988) Patella baja complicating total knee arthroplasty. A report of two cases. J Arthroplasty 3:177–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fehring TK (2000) Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Inglis AE, Kelly M, Sobel M (1989) The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1031–1039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1998) The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 13:812–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heesterbeck PJC, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB (2009) Effects of the balanced gap technique on femoral component rotation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1015–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT (2002) Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 403:143–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:194–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanekasu K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y (2005) Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA (2001) Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthoplasty: reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 16:301–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krackow KA, Mihalko WM (1999) The effect of medial release on flexion and extension gaps in cadaveric knees: implications for soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthoplasty. Am J Knee Surg 12:222–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krackow KA, Mihalko WM (1999) Flexion-extension joint gap changes after lateral structure release for valgus deformity correction in total knee arthoplasty: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 14:994–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y (2001) Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 14:152–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotaion in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee protheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:259–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS (1990) The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:43–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Romero J, Duronio JF, Sohrabi A, Alexander N, NacWilliams BA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS (2002) Varus and valgus flexion laxity of total knee alignment methods in loaded cadeveric knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394:243–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Romero J, Stähelin T, Binkert C, Pfirrmann C, Hodler J, Kessler O (2007) The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:235–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singerman R, Pagan HD, Peyser AB, Goldberg VM (1997) Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 334:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tokuhara Y, Kadoya Y, Kanekasu K, Kondo M, Kobayashi A, Takaoka K (2006) Evaluation of the flexion gap by axial radiography of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1327–1330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Winemaker MJ (2002) Perfect balance in total knee arthroplasty: the elusive compromise. J Arthroplasty 17:2–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, Pattbergstrasse 1-3, 45239, Essen, Germany

    Tim Classen, Stefan Landgraeber, Alexander Wegner & Marius von Knoch

  2. Department of Radiology, Kliniken Essen Süd, Pattbergstrasse 1-3, 45239, Essen, Germany

    Ralf-Dietrich Müller

Authors
  1. Tim Classen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Landgraeber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Wegner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ralf-Dietrich Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marius von Knoch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Classen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Classen, T., Landgraeber, S., Wegner, A. et al. Femoral component rotation in patients with leg axis deviation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 1077–1081 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1344-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1344-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation