Skip to main content


Log in

No impact of severe varus deformity on clinical outcome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

An Erratum to this article was published on 11 January 2011



Severe varus deformity may lead to premature failure of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) because of technical difficulties associated with satisfactory alignment and good ligament balance. The aim of the study was to assess whether preoperative varus severity would affect the longevity, clinical outcomes, and complication rates of TKAs.


From a prospectively collected database, we assessed outcomes in 168 knees that underwent primary TKAs using a single posterior stabilized design. These included 86 knees with mild preoperative deformity (varus mechanical tibiofemoral angle ≤5°) and 82 knees with severe preoperative deformity (varus angle ≥15°). Survivorship was analyzed by a life-table method. Clinical outcomes were also compared, including Knee Society knee and functional scores and complication rates.


The postoperative tibiofemoral angle of the mild varus group was 7.1° ± 2.5°, whereas that of the severe varus group was 6.4° ± 2.5° (n.s.). There were no significant differences in terms of perioperative complications. Both groups showed the same cumulative survival rate, with absence of mechanical failure, of 98% at 7 years without difference (n.s.). There were no significant between-group differences of clinical parameters throughout the each follow-up period.


The knees with preoperative severe varus deformity were achieved the results comparable to those in knees with mild varus deformity, as determined by survival rate and clinical results. These data suggest that preoperative severe varus deformities can be successfully managed and do not have any detrimental effect on the longevity and clinical outcomes after a modern posterior stabilized TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Davis CR, Davies AP, Newman JH (2007) Causes of failure of the Kinemax Plus total knee replacement in the first five years. Knee 14:158–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL et al (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heyse TJ, Decking R, Davis J et al (2009) Varus gonarthrosis predisposes to varus malalignment in TKA. HSS J 5:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN (1981) The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:94–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karachalios T, Sarangi PP, Newman JH (1994) Severe varus and valgus deformities treated by total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:938–942

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kubiak P, Archibeck MJ, White RE Jr (2008) Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with at least fifteen degrees of coronal plane deformity. J Arthroplasty 23:366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR (2006) Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, posterior stabilized, and varus/valgus posterior stabilized constrained articulations in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:419–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lombardi AV Jr, Nett MP, Scott WN et al (2009) Primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 5):52–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P et al (2001) The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16:635–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S et al (2006) Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mullaji AB, Padmanabhan V, Jindal G (2005) Total knee arthroplasty for profound varus deformity: technique and radiological results in 173 knees with varus of more than 20 degrees. J Arthroplasty 20:550–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters CL (2006) Soft-tissue balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:413–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rawlinson JJ, Closkey RF Jr, Davis N et al (2008) Stemmed implants improve stability in augmented constrained condylar knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2639–2643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritter MA, Faris GW, Faris PM et al (2004) Total knee arthroplasty in patients with angular varus or valgus deformities of > or = 20 degrees. J Arthroplasty 19:862–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Teeny SM, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS et al (1991) Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:19–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Willson SE, Munro ML, Sandwell JC et al (2010) Isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0001733).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Il Bin.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, BS., Lee, SJ., Kim, JM. et al. No impact of severe varus deformity on clinical outcome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 960–966 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: