Skip to main content
Log in

Malalignment and cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our current study is to present the 12.6 years’ follow-up results in patients with cartilage lesions of the patellofemoral joint, treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) with the use of periosteum.

Methods

Ninety-two patients having patella or trochlea lesion participated in this study. Lysholm and Tegner questionnaires were completed 12.6 years (SD 2.3 years) after the surgery. The patients were asked whether they feel better, worse or had not experienced any difference compared to previous years and whether they would undergo the operation again. Complications or subsequent surgeries were also assessed.

Results

Median Tegner score was three, improved by one level compared with preoperative values (P = 0.02). Median Lysholm score was 70, improved by nine points (n.s.). Seventy-two percent of the patients were better or unchanged while 93% would undergo the operation again. Patients with no kissing lesions appeared to have a better prognosis. Patients with malalignment or instability that had undergone a realignment procedure had comparable outcomes to the patients that did not need any additional surgery. Realignment procedures increased the incidence of serious complications but they were associated with decreased incidence of periosteal hypertrophy. No association was found between the age of the patients at the time of the ACI or the size per lesion and any of the clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

ACI provides a satisfactory outcome for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the patellofemoral joint, even for the cases with concomitant patellar instability. It seems that correcting the coexisting background factors with realignment, stabilizing or unloading procedures, along with the treatment of cartilage lesions, is improving the clinical outcomes over time and decreases the incidence of periosteal hypertrophies although increasing the incidence of serious complications. Our study reveals the good results and the high level of patients’ activities (as shown by Tegner score), were preserved 12.6 years after the implantation, in both isolated trochlea and patella lesions and also in multiple and in kissing lesions where an intervention could be considered as a salvage procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfredson H, Lorentzon R (1999) Superior results with continuous passive motion compared to active motion after periosteal transplantation. A retrospective study of human patella cartilage defect treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:232–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck PR, Thomas AL, Farr J, Lewis PB, Cole BJ (2005) Trochlear contact pressures after anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle. Am J Sports Med 33:1710–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW et al (2003) A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:223–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Breinan HA, Minas T, Hsu HP, Nehrer S, Sledge CB, Spector M (1997) Effect of cultured autologous chondrocytes on repair of chondral defects in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1439–1451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Browne JE, Anderson AF, Arciero R et al (2005) Clinical outcome of autologous chondrocyte implantation at 5 years in US subjects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:237–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebert JR, Robertson WB, Lloyd DG, Zheng MH, Wood DJ, Ackland T (2008) Traditional vs accelerated approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:1131–1140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farr J (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation improves patellofemoral cartilage treatment outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:187–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farr J (2008) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and anteromedialization in the treatment of patellofemoral chondrosis. Orthop Clin North Am 39:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fulkerson JP (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med 30:447–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fulkerson JP (1983) Anteromedialization of the tibial tuberosity for patellofemoral malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177:176–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gobbi A, Kon E, Berruto M et al (2009) Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gooding CR, Bartlett W, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington R, Flanagan A (2006) A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee 13:203–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hjelle K, Solheim E, Strand T, Muri R, Brittberg M (2002) Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 18:730–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones DG, Peterson L (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation. Instr Course Lect 56:429–445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC et al (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2009) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 37:33–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C et al (2006) Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14:1119–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Magit D, Wolff A, Sutton K, Medvecky MJ (2007) Arthrofibrosis of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:682–694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandelbaum B, Browne JE, Fu F et al (2007) Treatment outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation for full-thickness articular cartilage defects of the trochlea. Am J Sports Med 35:915–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Micheli LJ, Browne JE, Erggelet C et al (2001) Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: multicenter experience and minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med 11:223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Minas T (1998) Chondrocyte implantation in the repair of chondral lesions of the knee: economics and quality of life. Am J Orthop 27:739–744

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minas T, Bryant T (2005) The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nomura E, Inoue M, Kurimura M (2003) Chondral and osteochondral injuries associated with acute patellar dislocation. Arthroscopy 19:717–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson L (2005) Autologous Cartilage implantation: cartilage biopsy, cartilage implantation. In: Cushner FD, Norman Scott W, Scuderi GR (eds) Surgical techniques for the knee. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I, Akerlund EL, Lindahl A (2002) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J Sports Med 30:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peterson L, Karlsson J, Brittberg M (1988) Patellar instability with recurrent dislocation due to patellofemoral dysplasia. Results after surgical treatment. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 48:130–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 374:212–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peterson L, Vasiliadis HS, Brittberg M, Lindahl A (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38:1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Riegger-Krugh CL, McCarty EC, Robinson MS, Wegzyn DA (2008) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: current surgery and rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:206–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J et al (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36:235–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shortkroff S, Barone L, Hsu HP et al (1996) Healing of chondral and osteochondral defects in a canine model: the role of cultured chondrocytes in regeneration of articular cartilage. Biomaterials 17:147–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steinwachs MR, Guggi T, Kreuz PC (2008) Marrow stimulation techniques. Injury 39 Suppl(1):S26–S31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vasiliadis HS, Danielson B, Ljungberg M, McKeon B, Lindahl A, Peterson L (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in cartilage lesions of the knee: long-term evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique. Am J Sports Med 38:943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vasiliadis HS, Wasiak J, Salanti G (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review of randomized studies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Epub ahead of print]; PMID: 20127071

  39. Vasiliadis HS, Wasiak J (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD003323

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haris S. Vasiliadis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasiliadis, H.S., Lindahl, A., Georgoulis, A.D. et al. Malalignment and cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 452–457 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1267-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1267-1

Keywords

Navigation