Abstract
Different surgical techniques exist for biceps tenodesis. The most secure fixation technique is with interference screws. The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanical performance of three different interference screw biceps tenodesis fixation methods, which involve different tunnel preparation methods. Using a sheep shoulder model and metal interference screws, a bone wedge technique was compared to serial tunnel dilation and a control group. After a preload, all repairs were cyclically loaded (20–60 N) for 100 cycles followed by destructive testing. Biceps tenodesis using an interference screw—bone wedge technique showed statistically lower cyclic displacement (8.1 ± 6.4 mm) than serial dilatation with an interference screw (21.3 ± 8.4 mm) or interference screw fixation alone (18.3 ± 8.3 mm) (P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in ultimate failure strength for any of the interference screw biceps tenodesis techniques tested. The tunnel preparation method chosen for interference screw fixed biceps tenodesis can have a positive effect on tenodesis performance. Using the bone wedge technique may allow a more rapid rehabilitation program applicable for the traumatic biceps tendon rupture seen in young, athletic patients with high demands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cain EL, Phillips BB, Charlebois SJ, Azar FM (2005) Effect of tibial tunnel dilation on pullout strength of semitendinosus-gracilis graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 28:779–783
Cope MR, Ali A, Bayliss NC (2004) Biceps rupture in body builders: three case reports of rupture of the long head of the biceps at the tendon-labrum junction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:580–582
Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Bruggemann GP, Koebke J (2007) The effect of bone tunnel dilation versus extraction drilling on the initial fixation strength of press-fit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:801–807
Duffee AR, Brunelli JA, Nyland J, Burden R, Nawab A, Caborn D (2007) Bioabsorbable screw divergence angle, not tunnel preparation method influences soft tissue tendon graft-bone tunnel fixation in healthy bone. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:17–25
Dunkin BS, Nyland J, Duffee AR, Brunelli JA, Burden R, Caborn D (2007) Soft tissue tendon graft fixation in serially dilated or extraction-drilled tibial tunnels: a porcine model study using high-resolution quantitative computerized tomography. Am J Sports Med 35:448–457
Friedman DJ, Dunn JC, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2008) Proximal biceps tendon: injuries and management. Sports Med Arthrosc 16:162–169
Golish SR, Caldwell PE III, Miller MD, Singanamala N, Ranawat AS, Treme G et al (2008) Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 24:1103–1108
Green JR, Nemzek JA, Arnoczky SP, Johnson LL, Balas MS (1999) The effect of bone compaction on early fixation of porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty 14:91–97
Healey JH, Barton S, Noble P, Kohl HW III, Ilahi OA (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of the origin of the long head of the biceps tendon. Arthroscopy 4:378–382
Heinzelmann AD, Savoie FH III, Ramsey JR, Field LD, Mazzocca AD (2009) A combined technique for distal biceps repair using a soft tissue button and biotenodesis interference screw. Am J Sports Med 5:989–994
Herbort M, Weimann A, Zantop T, Strobel M, Raschke M, Petersen W (2007) Initial fixation strength of a new hybrid technique for femoral ACL graft fixation: the bone wedge technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:769–775
Jayamoorthy T, Field JR, Costi JJ, Martin DK, Stanley RM, Hearn TC (2004) Biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical study of fixation methods. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:160–164
Kannus P, Jozsa L (1991) Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1507–1525
Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ (2005) Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 3:208–213
Kilicoglu O, Koyuncu O, Demirhan M, Esenyel CZ, Atalar AC, Ozsoy S et al (2005) Time-dependent changes in failure loads of 3 biceps tenodesis techniques: in vivo study in a sheep model. Am J Sports Med 33:1536–1544
Kim SH, Yoo JC (2005) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using interference screw: end-tunnel technique. Arthroscopy 21:1405
Kusma M, Dienst M, Eckert J, Steimer O, Kohn D (2008) Tenodesis of the long head of biceps brachii: cyclic testing of five methods of fixation in a porcine model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:967–973
Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy 20:85–95
Lopez-Vidriero E, Costic RS, Fu FH, Rodosky MW (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of 2 arthroscopic biceps tenodeses: double-anchor versus percutaneous intra-articular transtendon (PITT) techniques. Am J Sports Med 1:146–153
Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21:1296–1306
Miller KE, Solomon DJ (2008) Paralabral rupture of the proximal biceps tendon from light weightlifting. Mil Med 12:1238–1240
Millett PJ, Sanders B, Gobezie R, Braun S, Warner JJ (2009) Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter? BMC Musculoskel Disorder 9:121
Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O, Balcik C, Tasci A, Tandogan RN et al (2005) Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy 21:992–998
Pettersson U, Alfredson H, Nordstrom P, Henriksson-Larsen K, Lorentzon R (2000) Bone mass in female cross-country skiers: relationship between muscle strength and different BMD sites. Calcif Tissue Int 67:199–206
Richards DP, Burkhart SS (2005) A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques. Arthroscopy 21:861–866
Rittmeister ME, Noble PC, Bocell JR Jr, Alexander JW, Conditt MA, Kohl HW III (2001) Interactive effects of tunnel dilation on the mechanical properties of hamstring grafts fixed in the tibia with interference screws. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:267–271
Romeo AA, Mazzocca AD, Tauro JC (2004) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 20:206–213
Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K (1999) Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:644–654
Tomihara T, Ohashi H, Yo H (2007) Comparison of direct and indirect interference screw fixation for tendon graft in rabbits. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:26–30
Turner AS, Mallinckrodt CH, Alvis MR, Bryant HU (1995) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in sheep: experiences with in vivo and ex vivo studies. Bone 17:381S–387S
Wolf RS, Zheng N, Weichel D (2005) Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy 21:182–185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hapa, O., Günay, C., Kömürcü, E. et al. Biceps tenodesis with interference screw: cyclic testing of different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 1779–1784 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1180-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1180-7