Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro measurement of intraarticular pressure in the ankle joint

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Ankle joint affections and injuries are common problems in sports traumatology and in the daily routine of arthroscopic surgeons. However, there is little knowledge regarding intraarticular loads. Pressures on the ankle were determined in a dynamic model on 8 cadaver specimens, applying forces to tendons of the foot over the stance phase under vertical loading. A characteristic course of loading in the tibiotalar joint with a rapid increase upon heel contact was observed. It increased gradually to reach a maximum after 70% of the stance phase, during the push-off phase. The major torque in the ankle joint is located anterolaterally. A dynamic loading curve of the ankle joint can be demonstrated. These observations explain phenomena such as the appearance of osteophytes on the anterior tibia in the case of ankle osteoarthritis and the relatively low incidence of posterior tibial edge fragments in the case of trimalleolar ankle fracture. Furthermore, the medial side of the talus is less loaded compared to the lateral side, which appears relevant to the treatment of osteochondrosis dissecans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DD, Goldsworthy JK, Shivanna K, Grosland NM, Pedersen DR, Thomas TP, Tochigi Y, Marsh JL, Brown TD (2006) Intra-articular contact stress distributions at the ankle throughout stance phase-patient-specific finite element analysis as a metric of degeneration propensity. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5:82–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Calhoun JH, Li F, Ledbetter BR, Viegas SF (1994) A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion. Foot Ankle Int 15:125–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Driscoll HL, Christensen JC, Tencer AF (1994) Contact characteristics of the ankle joint. Part 1. The normal joint. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 84:491–498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hurschler C, Emmerich J, Wulker N (2003) In vitro simulation of stance phase gait part I: model verification. Foot Ankle Int 24:614–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T (1980) Load-bearing pattern of the ankle joint. Contact area and pressure distribution. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96:45–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinelli L, Hurschler C, Rosenbaum D (2006) Comparison of capacitive versus resistive joint contact stress sensors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:214–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michelson JD, Checcone M, Kuhn T, Varner K (2001) Intra-articular load distribution in the human ankle joint during motion. Foot Ankle Int 22:226–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muller-Gerbl M (2001) Anatomy and biomechanics of the ankle joint. Orthopaede 30:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nuber GW (1988) Biomechanics of the foot and ankle during gait. Clin Sports Med 7:1–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Procter P, Paul JP (1982) Ankle joint biomechanics. J Biomech 15:627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Wulker N (2007) Changes in Chopart joint load following tibiotalar arthrodesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suckel A, Muller O, Langenstein P, Herberts T, Wulker N (2008) Chopart’s joint load during gait. In vitro study of ten cadaver specimen in a dynamic model. Gait Posture 27:216–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:356–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle. Part 2: Movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24:888–896

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan LB, de Asla RJ, Rubash HE, Li G (2006) Determination of in vivo articular cartilage contact areas of human talocrural joint under weightbearing conditions. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:1294–1301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu JZ, Herzog W, Epstein M (1998) Effects of inserting a pressensor film into articular joints on the actual contact mechanics. J Biomech Eng 120:655–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Suckel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suckel, A., Muller, O., Wachter, N. et al. In vitro measurement of intraarticular pressure in the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 664–668 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1040-5

Keywords

Navigation