Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised study
- 1.7k Downloads
Cartilage defects occur in approximately 12% of the population and can result in significant function impairment and reduction in quality of life. Evidence for the variety of surgical treatments available is inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with symptomatic cartilage defects treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI™ or microfracture (MF). Included patients were ≥18 and ≤50 years of age with symptomatic, post-traumatic, single, isolated chondral defects (4–10 cm2) and were randomised to receive MACI™ or MF. Patients were followed up 8–12, 22–26 and 50–54 weeks post-operatively for efficacy and safety evaluation. Outcome measures were the Tegner, Lysholm and ICRS scores. Sixty patients were included in a randomised study (40 MACI™, 20 MF). The difference between baseline and 24 months post-operatively for both treatment groups was significant for the Lysholm, Tegner, patient ICRS and surgeon ICRS scores (all P < 0.0001). However, MACI™ was significantly more effective over time (24 months versus baseline) than MF according to the Lysholm (P = 0.005), Tegner (P = 0.04), ICRS patient (P = 0.03) and ICRS surgeon (P = 0.02) scores. There were no safety issues related to MACI™ or MF during the study. MACI™ is superior to MF in the treatment of articular defects over 2 years. MACI™ and MF are complementary procedures, depending on the size of the defect and symptom recurrence. The MACI™ technique represents a significant advance over both first and second generation chondrocyte-based cartilage repair techniques for surgeons, patients, health care institutions and payers in terms of reproducibility, safety, intraoperative time, surgical simplicity and reduced invasiveness.
KeywordsKnee Cartilage Autologous transplantation Arthroscopic microfracture Matrix induced chondrocyte implantation (MACI)
The authors would like to thank Dr. Gerrit Eichner for his assistance with the statistical analysis.
- 5.Bartlett W, Skinner JA, Gooding CR, Carrington RW, Flanagan AM, Briggs TW, Bentley G (2005) Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B:640–645Google Scholar
- 7.Bates D, Maechler M (2008) Matrix: sparse and dense matrix classes and methods. R package version 0.999375-16. http://cran.r-project.org/
- 12.Gooding CR, Bartlett W, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington R, Flanagan A (2006) A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee 13:203–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.ICRS Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package (2000) The International Cartilage Repair Society web site: http://www.cartilage.org/_files/contentmanagement/ICRS_evaluation.pdf. Accessed 28th September 2009
- 19.Jagiello MJ, Rogers B, Briggs TWR (2007) Sequential outcome improvement following autologous chondrocyte implantation—7 year follow-up Podium presentation (no. 182) at the 2007 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 14th–18th February, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
- 24.Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Resinger C, Aldrian SM, Vécsei V, Trattnig S (2005) Early post-operative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:451–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.r-project.org
- 28.Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, Haspl M, Bohnsack M, Fortems Y, Vandekerckhove B, Almqvist KF, Claes T, Handelberg F, Lagae K, van der Bauwhede J, Vandenneucker H, Yang KG, Jelic M, Verdonk R, Veulemans N, Bellemans J, Luyten FP (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36:235–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Venables WN, Ripley BD (2003) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-0387954578Google Scholar