Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The transtibial (TT) drilling of the femoral tunnel in the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was found to place the tunnel non-anatomically. The use of the anteromedial portal (AMP) for the femoral drilling would provide the surgeon with more freedom to anatomically place the tunnel in the real femoral ACL footprint. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of BPTB ACL reconstruction using the AMP or the TT technique for the femoral tunnel drilling. A Medline search was not able to identify any study directly comparing the clinical outcomes of the AMP and the TT techniques. The literature search identified experimental and quasi-experimental studies published from 1966 to March 2009 where at least one group underwent arthroscopic autologous BPTB ACL reconstructions using either the AMP or the TT technique for the femoral tunnel drilling. Overall IKDC, Lysholm score, activity level, range of motion, single-leg hoop test, Lachman test, Pivot shift sign test, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, and radiographic assessments were indirectly compared between the two groups (AMP versus TT). Twenty-one studies, involving a total of 859 patients (257 in the AMP and 602 in the TT group), were included in this analysis. The AMP group demonstrated significantly earlier return to run and significantly greater range of motion, Lachman test values, and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements in the 1–2-year follow-up, although no differences were found for both the 3–5 and the 6–10-year follow-ups for any of these parameters. In contrast, the TT group demonstrated significantly higher activity level for the 3–5 and 6–10-year follow-up. The use of the AMP elicited greater knee stability and range of motion values, and earlier return to run compared to the TT technique. These results may indicate a potential benefit of the AMP over the TT technique. However, as the benefits of the AMP were not obtained in the mid and long-term follow-ups, overall there is no definitive evidence at this point to conclude that one technique is superior to the other. Randomized controlled trials directly comparing the use of both techniques with long-term follow-ups will help clarify which one, if any, provides best clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trialth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2143–2155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn JH, Lee SH, Yoo JC, Ha HC (2007) Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1293–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, Samitier G, Romero D, Lázaro-Haro C, Cugat R (2009) Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:705–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med 29:272–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold MP, Kooloos J, van Kampen A (2001) Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:194–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beard DJ, Anderson JL, Davies S, Price AJ, Dodd CAF (2001) Hamstrings versus patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 8:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bottoni CR, Rooney RC, Harpstrite JK, Kan DM (1998) Ensuring accurate femoral guide pin placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 27:764–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caldwell DM (2007) Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis. Lancet 369:270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cha PS, Chhabra A, Harner CD (2005) Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the medial portal technique. Oper Tech Orthop 15:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel D, Stone M, Dobson B, Fithian D, Rossman D, Kaufman K (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel for the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:220–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM (2009) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22:7–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N, Kohler K, Karlsson J (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 31:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson E, Svensson L-I, San TK, Vanlentin A (1996) Late results and sequelae after soccer. In: Garret WE Jr (ed) The U.S. Soccer Federation sports medicine book of soccer. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feller JA, Webster KE (2003) A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:564–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gavriilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, Georgoulis AD, Mitsionis G, Xenakis TA (2008) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee 15:364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Getelman MH, Friedman MJ (1999) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:189–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giron F, Buzzi R, Aglietti P (1999) Femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three techniques. A cadaver study. Arthroscopy 15:750–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorschewsky O, Klakow A, Riechert K, Pitzl M, Becker R (2005) Clinical comparison of the Tutoplast allograft and autologous patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone) for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Two- and 6-year results. Am J Sports Med 33:1202–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Liantsis A, Venouziou A, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN (2009) Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Knee Surg Sports Traum Arthrosc 17:880–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hardin GT, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Farr J (1992) Endoscopic single-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Am J Knee Surg 5:144–155

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS (2008) Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 24:113–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ibrahim SAR, Al-Kussary IM, Al-Misfer ARK, Al-Mutairi HQ, Ghafar SA, El Noor TA (2005) Clinical evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus gracilis and semitendinosus autograft. Arthroscopy 21:412–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Irrgang JJ, Safran M, Fu FH (1996) The knee: ligamentous and meniscal injuries. In: Zachazewski J, Magee D, Quillen W (eds) Athletic injuries and rehabilitation. W.B. Saunders, Pennsylvania, pp 623–692

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones KG (1970) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the central one-third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:838–839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleipool AEB, Zijl JAC, Willems WJ (1998) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft. A prospective study with an average follow up of 4 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:224–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, Chang CB, Park YK, Jo H, Kim CH (2007) Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:771–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lidén M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35:740–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 19:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ (2007) A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A comparison of patellar tendon and quadrupled-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med 35:384–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Markolf KL, Hame SL, Hunter DM, Oakes DA, Zoric B, Gause P, Finerman GAM (2002) Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orhop Res 20:1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matsumoto A, Yoshiya S, Muratsu H, Yagi M, Iwasaki Y, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2006) A comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and bone-hamstring tendon-bone autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH (2008) Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 36:1414–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Meunier A, Odensten M, Good L (2007) Long-term results after primary repair or non-surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a randomized study with a 15-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:230–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mott HW (1983) Semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction for cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop 172:90–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Muneta T, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Ogiuchi T, Yamamoto H, Shinomiya K (1999) Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with EndoButton: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 15:618–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. O’Neill DB (1996) Arthroscopic assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:803–813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paessler H, Rossis J, Mastrokalos D, Kotsovolos I (2004) Anteromedial versus transtibial technique for correct femoral tunnel placement during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstrings: an in vivo study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:S234–S238

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pinczewski LA, Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Clingeleffer AJ (2002) A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 30:523–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Kawamata T, Chew M (2005) A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med 33:1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rue JP, Ghodadra N, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2008) Femoral and tibial tunnel position using a transtibial drilled anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. J Knee Surg 21:246–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K (2006) A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:1933–1940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT (2004) The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 20:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK, Marumoto JM, Richardson AB (2002) A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Toritsuka Y, Nakagawa S, Horibe S (2005) Anatomically oriented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft via rectangular socket and tunnel a snug-fit and impingement-free grafting technique. Arthroscopy 21:1402.e1–1402.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. van der Hart CP, van den Bekerom MP, Patt TW (2008) The occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg 10:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  53. Veltri D (1997) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 16:123–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wagner M, Kääb MJ, Schallock J, Haas NP, Weiler A (2005) Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation. A prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 33:1327–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wetzler MJ, Getelman MH, Friedman MJ, Bartolozzi AR (1998) Revision anterior cruciate ligamentsurgery: etiology of failures. Oper Tech Sports Med 6:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yu B, Garrett WE (2007) Mechanisms of non-contact ACL injuries. Br J Sports Med 41(suppl 1):i47–i51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zaricznyj B (1987) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a doubled tendon graft. Clin Orthop 220:162–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Artroscopia G.C., Hospital Quirón, Barcelona, Spain

    Eduard Alentorn-Geli & Ramón Cugat

  2. Hospital “Vega Baja” Orihuela, Alicante, Spain

    Francisco Lajara

  3. Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain

    Gonzalo Samitier

  4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Quirón, Plaza Alfonso Comín 5–7, 08023, Barcelona, Spain

    Ramón Cugat

Authors
  1. Eduard Alentorn-Geli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Lajara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gonzalo Samitier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ramón Cugat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramón Cugat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alentorn-Geli, E., Lajara, F., Samitier, G. et al. The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 1013–1037 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0964-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0964-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation