Advertisement

Ankle morbidity after autogenous Achilles tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Jai Gon Seo
  • Jae Chul Yoo
  • Young Wan Moon
  • Moon Jong ChangEmail author
  • Jong Won Kwon
  • Jong Hyun Kim
  • Mu Hyun Kim
Knee
  • 190 Downloads

Abstract

Although several alternative autografts with reduced morbidity of harvest site have been introduced, no donor site is free of morbidity concerns. The authors report on ankle status after autogenous Achilles tendon harvesting with a minimum 10-year follow-up. From October 1994 to October 1996, a consecutive series of 47 ankles underwent harvesting of the medial third or half of the ipsilateral autogenous Achilles tendon for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Donor site statuses were evaluated using a modified Thermann’s scale. Postoperative isokinetic muscle strength testing was performed, and magnetic resonance images of donor sites were available for selected patients. Thirty-three ankles in the 32 patients were followed for more than 10 years. There were 27 men (84%) and 5 women (16%) with a mean age of 31 years (range 16–52 years) at the time of surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 12 years and 1 month (range 10 years and 5 months to 13 years and 4 months). Mean postoperative modified Thermann’s scale score was 87 (range 45–95; SD 14.3). Twenty-five (76%) ankles achieved very good or good results. A slight decrease in calf circumference <1 cm was seen in the ten ankles, 1–2 cm in the four ankles. Nine ankles were mildly hypersensitive to meteorological changes. Peak torque of ankle plantar flexion was slightly lower on the index limb at both velocities in nine selected patients who carried out performance tests. However, there were no significant differences (5.2% at 30°/s and 2.7% at 120°/s, P = n.s. and = n.s.). Of the 12 available follow-up magnetic resonance images, the average cross-sectional area of the remaining tendon was 82.01 mm2 (range 69.05–107.35; SD 10.3), and their average thickness was 7.4 mm (range 6–10.35; SD 1.1). After a minimum 10-year follow-up, the harvesting of autogenous Achilles tendons was not found to significantly jeopardize ankle status. However, it also could not be independent of donor morbidity as an alternative. The level of evidence was retrospective level IV, as a therapeutic study.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Achilles tendon Autograft Ankle morbidity 

References

  1. 1.
    Breitfuss H, Frohlich R, Povacz P, Resch H, Wicker A (1996) The tendon defect after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the midthird patellar tendon—a problem for the patellofemoral joint? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:194–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Carson EW (1993) The use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Technique and results. Clin Sports Med 12:723–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruns J, Kampen J, Kahrs J, Plitz W (2000) Achilles tendon rupture: experimental results on spontaneous repair in a sheep-model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:364–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clancy WG Jr, Nelson DA, Reider B, Narechania RG (1982) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using one-third of the patellar ligament, augmented by extra-articular tendon transfers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:352–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conway AM, Dorner RW, Zuckner J (1967) Regeneration of resected calcaneal tendon of the rabbit. Anat Rec 158:43–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL, Warren RF (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21:818–823 (discussion 823–814)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dandy DJ, Edwards DJ (1994) Problems in regaining full extension of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: does arthrofibrosis exist? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:76–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardin A, Bruno J, Movin T, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Shalabi A (2006) Magnetic resonance signal, rather than tendon volume, correlates to pain and functional impairment in chronic Achilles tendinopathy. Acta Radiol 47:718–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karanikas K, Arampatzis A, Bruggemann GP (2004) Development of muscle strength in knee, hip and ankle joints after ACL reconstruction. Sportverletz Sportschaden 18:130–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J (2001) Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy 17:971–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krueger-Franke M, Siebert CH, Scherzer S (1995) Surgical treatment of ruptures of the Achilles tendon: a review of long-term results. Br J Sports Med 29:121–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis G, Shaw KM (1997) Tensile properties of human tendo Achillis: effect of donor age and strain rate. J Foot Ankle Surg 36:435–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller SL, Gladstone JN (2002) Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am 33:675–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seo JG, Cho DY, Kim KY (1993) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with Achilles tendon autograft. Orthopedics 16:719–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shelbourne KD, Vanadurongwan B, Gray T (2007) Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using contralateral patellar tendon autograft. Clin Sports Med 26:549–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siebold R, Buelow JU, Bos L, Ellermann A (2003) Primary ACL reconstruction with fresh-frozen patellar versus Achilles tendon allografts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:180–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Svensson M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Lindahl S, Karlsson J (2004) Does the patellar tendon normalize after harvesting its central third? A prospective long-term MRI study. Am J Sports Med 32:34–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thermann H, Zwipp H, Tscherne H (1995) Functional treatment concept of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon: 2 years results of a prospective randomized study. Unfallchirurg 98:21–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wren TA, Yerby SA, Beaupre GS, Carter DR (2001) Mechanical properties of the human Achilles tendon. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 16:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jai Gon Seo
    • 1
  • Jae Chul Yoo
    • 1
  • Young Wan Moon
    • 1
  • Moon Jong Chang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jong Won Kwon
    • 2
  • Jong Hyun Kim
    • 1
  • Mu Hyun Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations