Intercondylar roof impingement pressure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a porcine model
- 285 Downloads
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft impingement against the intercondylar roof has been postulated, but not thoroughly investigated. The roof impingement pressure changes with different tibial and femoral tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction. Anterior tibial translation is also affected by the tunnel positions of ACL reconstruction. The study design included a controlled laboratory study. In 15 pig knees, the impingement pressure between ACL and intercondylar roof was measured using pressure sensitive film before and after ACL single bundle reconstruction. ACL reconstructions were performed in each knee with two different tibial and femoral tunnel position combinations: (1) tibial antero-medial (AM) tunnel to femoral AM tunnel (AM to AM) and (2) tibial postero-lateral (PL) tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (PL to High-AM). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was evaluated after each ACL reconstruction using robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Neither the AM to AM nor the PL to High-AM ACL reconstruction groups showed significant difference when compared with intact ACL in roof impingement pressure. The AM to AM group had a significantly higher failure load than PL to High-AM group. This study showed how different tunnel placements affect the ACL-roof impingement pressure and anterior-posterior laxity in ACL reconstruction. Anatomical ACL reconstruction does not cause roof impingement and it has a biomechanical advantage in ATT when compared with non-anatomical ACL reconstructions in the pig knee. There is no intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligament Reconstruction Anatomical Double bundle Impingement Pressure
The support of the Albert B. Ferguson Jr. MD Orthopaedic Fund of The Pittsburgh Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. We also wish to thank Fuji Film Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, for their generous donation of pressure sensitive films and technical assistance. The authors also thank Masahiro Nozaki, Andrew Tsai, James Yang and Timothy McGlaston for their kind help.
- 4.Brophy RH, Selby RM, Altchek DW (2006). Anterior cruciate ligament revision: double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. Arthroscopy 22: 683 e1–5Google Scholar
- 7.Darcy SP, Kilger RH, Woo SL et al (2006) Estimation of ACL forces by reproducing knee kinematics between sets of knees: a novel noninvasive methodology. J Bionech 39:2371–2377Google Scholar
- 18.Jagodzinski M, Richter GM, Passler HH (2000) Biomechanical analysis of knee hyperextension and of the impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cinematographic MRI study with impact on tibial tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:11–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar