Skip to main content
Log in

The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is presently evolving rapidly. In order to monitor the developments in surgical methods and clinical outcome, a national clinical database for knee ligament reconstructions was established in 2005 in Denmark. This study presents the first data with 2 year follow-up from the Danish ACL registry. All orthopaedic departments performing ACL reconstructions in Denmark, inlcuding private clinics, report to the registry. The database includes both surgery- and patient-related data. The surgeon reports anamnestic, objective knee laxity and operative data including graft and implant choices. At 1 year control, complications, reoperations, and objective knee laxity are recorded. The patient registers the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner function score preoperatively and at 1, 5 and 10 years follow-up. During the first 30 months, 5,872 knee-ligament reconstructions were registered. A total of 4,972 were primary ACL reconstructions, 443 were ACL revisions and 457 multiligament reconstructions. A total of 85% of all knee ligament reconstruction were reported to the database. A total of 71% of primary ACL reconstruction used hamstring tendon grafts and 21% used patella tendon graft. Meniscus injuries were treated in 35% of all patients. A total of 17% had significant cartilage lesions. At 2 years follow-up 3% of primary recontructions were revised. Follow-up KOOS demonstrated specific differences between primary ACL, revision ACL, and multiligament reconstructions. Sports/recreation score were 40, 32, 28 and quality of life score were 40, 32, 33 for the respective groups. This study presents the first follow-up data from a national ACL registry. These data will become new international reference materials for outcome measures before and after ACL surgery. The database will enable future monitoring of ACL reconstruction techniques and outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feller JA, Webster KE, Gavin B (2001) Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:260–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gobbi A, Francisco R (2006) Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1021–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2008) Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med 36:308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE (2000) The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 71(4):337–53, 71:337–353

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herberts P, Malchau H (1997) How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:44–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kostogiannis I, Ageberg E, Neuman P, Dahlberg L, Friden T, Roos H (2007) Activity level and subjective knee function 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective, longitudinal study of nonreconstructed patients. Am J Sports Med 35:1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lobenhoffer P (1999) Knee ligamnet injuries, Anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, indications. Chirurg 70:219–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lunde AS, Lundeborg S, Lettenstrom GS, Thygesen L, Huebner J (1980) The person-number systems of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Israel. Vital Health Stat 2 84:1–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Vascellari A, Loreti I, Kon E, Presti ML (2003) Intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing autogeneous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons: 5-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:2–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCulloch PC, Lattermann C, Boland AL, Bach BR Jr (2007) An illustrated history of anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Knee Surg 20:95–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Myklebust G, Maehlum S, Engebretsen L, Strand T, Solheim E (1997) Registration of cruciate ligament injuries in Norwegian top level team handball: a prospective study covering two seasons. Scand J Med Sci Sports 7:289–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R (2007) Prevention of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in elite and adolescent female team handball athletes. Instr Course Lect 56:407–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neuman P, Englund M, Kostogiannis I, Friden T, Roos H, Dahlberg LE (2008) Prevalence of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis 15 years after nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med 36:1528–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Petrie A (2006) Statistics in orthopaedic papers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1121–1136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (1999) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: 25 years experience. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:133–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shelbourne KD, Benner RW (2007) Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the chronic ACL-deficient knee with degenerative medial arthrosis. J Knee Surg 20:216–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelbourne KD, Klotz C (2006) What I have learned about the ACL: utilizing a progressive rehabilitation scheme to achieve total knee symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 11:318–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA (2008) Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med 36:176–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Lind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lind, M., Menhert, F. & Pedersen, A.B. The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 117–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0654-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0654-3

Keywords

Navigation