Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy is a realignment procedure to transfer weight-bearing load to the intact compartment of the knee to alleviate symptoms, slow disease progression, and defer subsequent total knee arthroplasty. To prevent overcorrection or undercorrection, it is not only important to have an exact preoperative calculation of the desired correction angle, but it is also critical to have an accurate intraoperative technique. 85 consecutive patients (90 knees) were enrolled, who were available at 1-year follow-up after a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system or a conventional method, for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis. On radiographic assessment, the navigation group showed better results than the conventional group in both the mechanical axis and the coordinate of the weight-bearing line on a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph (3.9° ± 1.0° vs. 2.7° ± 2.2° of valgus, P < 0.01), (62.3 ± 2.9% vs. 58.7 ± 6.6% coordinate at the tibial plateau, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the alteration of tibial slope between the two groups. On clinical assessment, the navigation group showed better results in both the mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (84 ± 8 vs. 79 ± 7, P < 0.01) and the mean Lysholm knee score (85 ± 6 vs. 83 ± 5, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in operation times between the two groups. Kinematic navigation-guided high tibial osteotomy is a reproducible and reliable procedure compared to conventional high tibial osteotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendola A (2003) Unicompartmental osteoarthritis in the active patient: the role of high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 19(Suppl 1):109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brouwer RW, Bierma-zeinstra SMA, van Raaij TM, Verhaar JAN (2006) Osteotomy for medial compartment arthritis of the knee using a closing wedge or an opening wedge controlled by a Puddu plate. A one-year randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1454–1459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowd GSE, Somayaji HS, Uthukuri M (2006) High tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Knee 13:87–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy: the effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:248–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:917–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernigou P, Ma W (2001) Open wedge tibial osteotomy with acrylic bone cement as bone substitute. Knee 8:103–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti PA, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:754–765

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson JP (1958) Osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee: proceedings of the Sheffield Regional Orthopaedic Club. J Bone Joint Surg Br 40:826

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, Suzuki N (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 22:1248–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koshino T, Murase T, Saito T (2003) Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of porous hydroxyapatite to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:78–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krettek Ch, Miclau T, Grun O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H (1998) Intraoperative control of axes rotation and length in femoral and tibial fractures Technical note. Injury 29(Suppl 3):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leone JM, Hassen AD (2006) Osteotomy in the sports knee. In: Insall JN, Scott WN. Surgery of the knee, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1752–1753

  14. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J (2005) Opening wedge tibial osteotomy: the 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 33:378–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs Preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:48–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rudan JF, Simurda MA (1990) High tibial osteotomy: a prospective clinical and roentgenographic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:251–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saleh M, Harriman P, Edwards DJ (1991) A radiological method for producing precise limb alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:515–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Saragaglia D, Roberts J (2005) Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics 28(10 Suppl):1269–1274

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF (2003) Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:469–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Staubli AE, Simoni CD, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury 34(Suppl 2):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Min Chun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SJ., Koh, YG., Chun, YM. et al. Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 128–134 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0630-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0630-y

Keywords

Navigation