Skip to main content

Evaluation of anatomic references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

The authors aimed to demonstrate the relationship between the sagittal mechanical axis of the tibia and other reference axes of the tibia and fibula in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee joints, and then to identify a reliable landmark in order to minimize posterior tibial slope measurement errors. We evaluated 133 osteoarthritic knees with neutral or varus deformity in 64 female and 8 male patients. Axial computed tomographic images of whole tibiae including knee and ankle joints were obtained and reconstructed using 3-dimensional imaging software. Angles between the mechanical axis (MA), the tibial anatomical axis (TAA), the anterior tibial cortex (ATC) and the fibular shaft axis (FSA) were measured, and then medial and lateral tibial slope angles were measured using all axes. Mean angles between MA and the other anatomical reference lines (TAA, ATC and FSA) were 0.9, 2.2 and −2.1°, respectively. The mean values of lateral tibial slopes with respect to MA, TAA, ATC and FSA were 8.7, 10, 12 and 7.3, respectively, and their intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were higher than those of medial tibial slopes. Although posterior tibial slope change markedly according to the reference axis used, the axes used in conventional TKA showed significant correlations with each other, and thus, may be used safely if differences with the mechanical axis are considered. Moreover, the lateral tibial slope might have advantages over the medial tibial slope in terms of restoration of the natural tibial slope.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Stulberg SD (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:177–184

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Whiteside LA, Amador DD (1988) The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(Suppl):S51–S57

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jojima H, Whiteside LA, Ogata K (2004) Effect of tibial slope or posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:194–198

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T et al (2004) Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32(2):376–382

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J et al (2005) The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(3):193–196

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singerman R, Dean JC, Pagan HD et al (1996) Decreased posterior tibial slope increases strain in the posterior cruciate ligament following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(1):99–103

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai B, Baez J, Testa N et al (2000) Effect of posterior cut angle on tibial component loading. J Arthroplasty 15(7):916–920

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RW (1991) Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:63–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):506–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Waelchli B, Romero J (2001) Dislocation of the polyethylene inlay due to anterior tibial slope in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(5):296–298

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW et al (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20(4):366–372

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cullu E, Aydogdu S, Alparslan B et al (2005) Tibial slope changes following dome-type high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(1):38–43

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J (2005) Opening wedge tibial osteotomy: the 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 33(3):378–387

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S et al (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):818–823

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J et al (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20(3):282–288

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R et al (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:180–186

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T et al (2004) Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):573–579

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M et al (2003) Usability of an image based navigation system in reconstruction of leg alignment in total knee arthroplasty—results of a prospective study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 48(12):339–343

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uematsu O, Hsu HP, Kelley KM et al (1987) Radiographic study of Kinematic total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2(4):317–326

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiu KY, Zhang SD, Zhang GH (2000) Posterior slope of tibial plateau in Chinese. J Arthroplasty 15(2):224–227

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R et al (1999) Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee. Am J Knee Surg 12(3):165–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY (2000) Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A(11):1603–1068

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reed MR, Bliss W, Sher JL et al (2002) Extramedullary or intramedullary tibial alignment guides: a randomised, prospective trial of radiological alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(6):858–860

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Genin P, Weill G, Julliard R (1993) The tibial slope. Proposal for a measurement method. J Radiol 74(1):27–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Julliard R, Genin P, Weil G et al (1993) The median functional slope of the tibia. Principle. Technique of measurement. Value. Interest. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 79(8):625–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Paley D (2002) Principles of deformity correction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 480–490

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kessler MA, Burkart A, Martinek V et al (2003) Development of a 3-dimensional method to determine the tibial slope with multislice-CT. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141(2):143–147

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Denis K, Van Ham G, Bellemans J et al (2002) How correctly does an intramedullary rod represent the longitudinal tibial axes? Clin Orthop Relat Res 397:424–433

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maestro A, Harwin SF, Sandoval MG et al (1998) Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 13(5):552–558

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F et al (1996) [Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(3):195–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuwano T, Urabe K, Miura H et al (2005) Importance of the lateral anatomic tibial slope as a guide to the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients. J Orthop Sci 10(1):42–47

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yoshioka Y, Siu DW, Scudamore RA et al (1989) Tibial anatomy and functional axes. J Orthop Res 7(1):132–137

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A062260). The authors thank to the medical research collaborating center at Seoul National University for assistance with the statistical analyses.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myung Chul Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, H.S., Chang, C.B., Seong, S.C. et al. Evaluation of anatomic references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 373–377 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0486-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0486-1

Keywords

  • Posterior slope
  • Anatomy
  • Tibia
  • Fibula
  • Computed tomography