Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

A more sports-specific and detailed strength assessment has been advocated for patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of lower extremity strength tests with high ability to discriminate between leg power development on the injured and uninjured sides in patients after ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Twenty-three patients were tested 6 months after ACL injury and 44 patients were tested 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four of the 44 patients were operated on using a hamstrings graft and 20 patients were operated on using a patellar tendon graft. All the patients performed a test battery of three strength tests for each leg in a randomised order. The three strength tests were chosen to reflect quadriceps and hamstring muscular power in a knee-extension and a knee-flexion test (open kinetic chain) and lower-extremity muscular power in a leg-press test (closed kinetic chain). There was a higher sensitivity for the test battery to discriminate abnormal leg power compared with any of the three strength tests individually. Nine out of ten patients after ACL reconstruction and six out of ten of the patients after ACL injury exhibited abnormal leg power symmetry using the test battery. Thus, this test battery had high ability in terms of discriminating between the leg power performance on the injured and uninjured side, both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that a test battery consisting of a knee-extension, knee-flexion and leg-press muscle power test had high ability to determine deficits in leg power 6 months after ACL injury and reconstruction. Only a minority of the patients had restored leg muscle power. The clinical relevance is that the test battery may contribute to the decision-making process when deciding whether and when patients can safely return to strenuous physical activities after an ACL injury or reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fithian DC, Paxton LW, Goltz DH (2002) Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Orthop Clin North Am 33:621–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roos H, Karlsson J (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament instability and reconstruction. Review of current trends in treatment. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:426–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC (2002) The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Clin Orthop 402:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy DF, Connolly DA, Beynnon BD (2003) Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 37:13–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkkari J, Kujala UM, Kannus P (2001) Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work. Sports Med 31:985–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sapega AA (1990) Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1562–1574

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Østerås H, Augestad LB, Tøndel S (1998) Isokinetic muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament construction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:279–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson JL, Lamb SE, Barker KL, Davies S, Dodd CA, Beard DJ (2002) Changes in muscle torque following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between hamstrings and patella tendon graft procedures on 45 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 73:546–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arangio GA, Chen C, Kalady M, Reed JF III (1997) Thigh muscle size and strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 26:238–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter T, Edinger S (1999) Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy 15:169–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst GP, Saliba E, Diduch DR, Hurwitz SR, Ball DW (2000) Lower extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 80:251–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2000) Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1472–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Newcombe P, Keays AC (2003) The relationship between knee strength and functional stability before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res 21:231–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewek M, Rudolph K, Axe M, Snyder-Mackler L (2002) The effect of insufficient quadriceps strength on gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech 17:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mattacola CG, Perrin DH, Gansneder BM, Gieck JH, Saliba EN, McCue FC (2002) Strength, functional outcome, and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train 37:262–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeifer K, Banzer W (1999) Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation. Scand J Med Sci Sports 9:19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Risberg MA, Holm I, Tjomsland O, Ljunggren E, Ekeland A (1999) Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:400–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Urbach D, Nebelung W, Becker R, Awiszus F (2001) Effects of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris: a prospective twitch interpolation study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1104–1110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wojtys EM, Huston LJ (2000) Longitudinal effects of anterior cruciate ligament injury and patellar tendon autograft reconstruction on neuromuscular performance. Am J Sports Med 28:336–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. MacDonald PB, Hedden D, Pacin O, Huebert D (1995) Effects of an accelerated rehabilitation program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with combined semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and a ligament augmentation device. Am J Sports Med 23:588–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shelbourne KD, Nitz P (1992) Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 15:256–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Carlo M, Shelbourne KD, Oneacre K (1999) Rehabilitation program for both knees when the contralateral autogenous patellar tendon graft is used for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:144–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Howell S, Taylor M (1996) Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:814–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W (1990) Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop 255:204–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eastlack ME, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (1999) Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:210–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2000) A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:76–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19:513–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Lysholm M, Gillquist J (1986) A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 14:156–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu-Ambrose T, Taunton JE, MacIntyre D, McConkey P, Khan KM (2003) The effects of proprioceptive or strength training on the neuromuscular function of the ACL reconstructed knee: a randomized clinical trail. Scand J Med Sci Sports 13:115–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Petschnig R, Baron R, Albrecht M (1998) The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength test and hop tests for distance and one-legged vertical jump test following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:23–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ross MD, Irrgang JJ, Denegar CR, McCloy CM, Unangst ET (2002) The relationship between participation restrictions and selected clinical measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:10–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR (1994) The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20:60–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Östenberg A, Roos E, Ekdahl C, Roos H (1998) Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:257–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Greenberger H, Paterno M (1995) Relationship of knee extensor strength and hopping test performance in the assessment of lower extremity function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 22:202–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Karunakara RG (1997) Effects of rest interval on isokinetic strength and functional performance after short-term high intensity training. Br J Sports Med 31:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Karunakara RG (1997) Relation between open and closed kinematic chain assessment of knee strength and functional performance. Clin J Sport Med 7:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dudley GA, Stevenson SW (2003) Use of electrical stimulation in strength and power training. In: Komi PV (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 426–435

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Häkkinen K (2003) Ageing and neuromuscular adaptation to strength training. In: Komi PV (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 409–425

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Knuttgen HG, Komi PV (2003) Basic considerations for exercise. In: Komi PV (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 3–7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, Dudley GA, Dooly C, Feigenbaum MS, Fleck SJ, Franklin B, Fry AC, Hoffman JR, Newton RU, Potteiger J, Stone MH, Ratamess NA, Triplett-McBride T (2002) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:364–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Augustsson J, Thomeé R (2000) Ability of closed and open kinetic chain tests of muscular strength to assess functional performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:164–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Salem GJ, Salinas R, Harding FV (2003) Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Grimby G (1986) Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Sand Suppl 711:233–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Risberg MA, Holm I, Ekeland A (1995) Reliability of functional knee tests in normal athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 5:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 410–411

  50. Agre JC, Magness JL, Hull SZ, Wright KC, Baxter TL, Patterson R, Stradel L (1987) Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:454–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wilk KE (1990) Dynamic muscle strength testing. In: Amundsen LR (ed) Muscle strength testing: instrumented and non-instrumented systems. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 134–135

    Google Scholar 

  52. Augustsson J, Esko A, Thomeé R, Svantesson U (1998) Weight training of the thigh muscles using closed vs. open kinetic chain exercises: a comparison of performance enhancement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:3–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sleivert G, Backus R, Wenger H (1995) The influence of a strength-sprint training sequence on multi-joint power output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12:1655–1665

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wilson GJ, Newton R, Murphy AJ, Humphries B (1993) The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:1279–1286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Osternig LR (1986) Isokinetic dynamometry: implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 14:45–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Petrella JK, Kim JS, Tuggle SC, Hall SR, Bamman MM (2004) Age differences in knee extension power, contractile velocity, and fatigability. J Appl Physiol 98:211–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Lindén C, Folkesson M, Tranberg R, Karlsson J (2005) Single-leg hop testing following fatiguing exercise: reliability and biomechanical analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports (Online publication date: 16-Feb-2005)

  58. Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Hörnstedt P, Lindblom J, Karlsson J, Grimby G (2003) Effect of pre-exhaustion exercise on lower-extremity muscle activation during a leg press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 17:411–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Itoh H, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Ichihashi N, Mizuno K (1998) Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pantano KJ, Irrgang JJ, Burdett R, Delitto A, Harner C, Fu FH (2000) A pilot study on the relationship between physical impairment and activity restriction in persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Östenberg A, Roos H (2000) Injury risk factors in female European football. A prospective study of 123 players during one season. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Beard DJ, Anderson JL, Davies S, Price AJ, Dodd CA (2001) Hamstrings vs. patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 8:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Feller JA, Webster KE, Gavin B (2001) Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:260–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Shelbourne KD, Nitz PA (1991) The O’Donoghue triad revisited. Combined knee injuries involving anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament tears. Am J Sports Med 19:474–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rudroff T (2003) Functional capability is enhanced with semitendinosus than patellar tendon ACL repair. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1486–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 32:1986–1995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Centre for Research in Sports and The Local Research and Development Council for Gothenburg and Southern Bohuslän, Sweden. The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lundberg Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden

    Camille Neeter, Alexander Gustavsson, Pia Thomeé, Jesper Augustsson, Roland Thomeé & Jon Karlsson

  2. Sportrehab–Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine Clinic, Göteborg, Sweden

    Camille Neeter, Alexander Gustavsson, Pia Thomeé, Jesper Augustsson & Roland Thomeé

Authors
  1. Camille Neeter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Gustavsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pia Thomeé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jesper Augustsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Thomeé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jon Karlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille Neeter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neeter, C., Gustavsson, A., Thomeé, P. et al. Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 14, 571–580 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0040-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0040-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation