Design for relevance concurrent engineering approach: integration of IATF 16949 requirements and design for X techniques

Abstract

With the growth of sustainability challenges, the automotive is regarded as one of the most important and strategic industries in the manufacturing sector. Reducing time in the product development process, seeking higher product quality, maintaining sustainable products, lowering product cost in the manufacturing process, and fulfilling customers’ requirements are the key factors of the success of a company. To achieve these requirements, automotive companies must consider the use of new sustainable models that ensure design efforts, customer, and societal needs from product ideation until its end-of-life. To do so, the leading companies adopt Design for X (DFX) as a concurrent approach, which considers several issues through different factors Xs. However, with the modified applications for various domains, several researchers have developed many DFX techniques. This multiplicity makes it difficult for researchers and practitioners to keep up with DFX development. Hence, the aim of this paper is first to use mixed and different techniques to organize and select the most prominent DFXs that consider quality and customer satisfaction strategies in designing automotive product. Second, a conceptual framework called, Design for Relevance (DFRelevance) is introduced. It addresses the design factors (guidelines) of each DFX and their associated modules to facilitate the collaboration between designers and all the project team during the whole product lifecycle. Furthermore, a modeling approach based on unsupervised learning is used to accomplish DFRelevance concerns. The aim of this approach is to cluster similar modules into homogenous groups to facilitate the simultaneous implementation of the concurrent engineering strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Aaker DA (2009) Managing brand equity. Simon and Schuster

  2. Alting DL, Annals DJJC (1993) The life cycle concept as a basis for sustainable industrial production. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnette AN, Brewer BL, Choal T (2014) Design for sustainability (DFS): the intersection of supply chain and environment. J Clean Prod 83:374–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker FB, Hubert LJ (1975) Measuring the power of hierarchical cluster analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 70:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10480256

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnes S (2002) Knowledge management systems: theory and practice

  6. Ben-David S, Luxburg U, Von Theory DPCL (2006) A sober look at clustering stability. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benabdellah AC, Benghabrit A, Science IB-P (2019a) A survey of clustering algorithms for an industrial context. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benabdellah AC, Bouhaddou I, Benghabrit A, Benghabrit O (2019b) A systematic review of design for X techniques from 1980 to 2018: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03418-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benghabrit A, Ouhbi B (2013) HB-2013 World congress on text clustering using statistical and semantic data. ieeexplore.ieee.org

  10. Biernacki C, Celeux G, Analysis GG-CS (2003) Choosing starting values for the EM algorithm for getting the highest likelihood in multivariate Gaussian mixture models. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  11. Birant D, Kut A (2007) ST-DBSCAN: an algorithm for clustering spatial–temporal data. Data Knowl Eng 60(1):208–221 (ISO 690)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boothroyd G, Design PD-M (1983) Design for assembly-selecting the right method. Pent PUBL INC 1100

  13. Booz, Allen, Hamilton (1982) New products management for the 1980s. Booz, Allen and Hamilton, New York, p 349

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bouhaddou I, Benabdelhafid A (2017) Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): A Key to Manage Supply Chain Complexity. In: Bourgine P, Collet P, Parrend P (eds) First Complex Systems Digital Campus World E-Conference 2015. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brambilla N, Eidelman S, Foka P et al (2014) QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: challenges and perspectives. Eur Phys J C 74:2981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brock G, Pihur V, Datta S, et al (2011) clValid, an R package for cluster validation. cran.microsoft.com

  17. Bukchin J, Masin M (2004) Multi-objective design of team oriented assembly systems. Eur J Oper Res 156:326–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cabanes G, Maps YB-S-O (2010) Learning the number of clusters in Self Organizing Map. intechopen.com

  19. Caliński T et al (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Taylor Fr

  20. Campello RJGB, Moulavi D, Sander J (2013) Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates. pp 160–172

  21. Chaouni Benabdellah A, Bouhaddou I, Benghabrit A (2018) Supply chain challenges with complex adaptive system perspective. Springer, Cham, pp 1081–1093

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaouni Benabdellah A, Bouhaddou I, Benghabrit A (2019) Holonic multi-agent system for modeling complexity structures of product development process. In: 2019 4th World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS). IEEE, pp 1–6

  23. Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V et al (2014) Package “nbclust.” cedric.cnam.fr

  24. Chen L, Ellis S, Holsapple C (2015) Supplier development: a knowledge management perspective. Knowl Process Manag 22:250–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiu M-C, Okudan GE (2010) Evolution of design for X tools applicable to design stages: a literature review. In: ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. pp 171–182

  26. Cleland JGF, Erhardt L, Murray G et al (1997) Effect of ramipril on morbidity and mode of death among survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure: a report from the AIRE Study

  27. Coyle G (2004) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In: Practical strategy: structured tools and techniques, pp 1–11

  28. Craigen D, Gerhart S, Ralston T (1993) An international survey of industrial applications of formal methods. pp 1–5

  29. Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free: the art of making quality certain

  30. Cross N (2001) Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des Issues 17:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Davies D (1979) Analysis DB-I transactions on pattern 1979 A cluster separation measure. ieeexplore.ieee.org

  33. Dayan R, Heisig P, Matos F (2017) Knowledge management as a factor for the formulation and implementation of organization strategy. J Knowl Manag 21:308–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Demoly F, Yan X, Eynard B et al (2011) An assembly oriented design framework for product structure engineering and assembly sequence planning. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dimitriadou K, Papaemmanouil O (2014) YD-P of the, 2014. Explore-by-example: an automatic query steering framework for interactive data exploration. dl.acm.org

  36. Dixon JR, Poli C (1995) Engineering design and design for manufacturing: a structured approach

  37. Dowlatshahi S (1999) A modeling approach to logistics in concurrent engineering. Europe J Op Res 115(1):59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern recognition and scene analysis

  39. Ebert C (2013) Improving engineering efficiency with PLM/ALM. Softw Syst Model 12(3):443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fahad A, Alshatri N, Tari Z, et al (2014) A survey of clustering algorithms for big data: taxonomy and empirical analysis. ieeexplore.ieee.org

  41. Fallah YP, Huang C-L, Sengupta R, Krishnan H (2011) Analysis of information dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks with application to cooperative vehicle safety systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 60:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Farrington CP, Andrews NJ, ADB-J of the R (1996) A statistical algorithm for the early detection of outbreaks of infectious disease. Wiley Online Libr

  43. Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Magazine PS-AI (1996) From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. aaai.org

  44. Fraley C et al. (1998) How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. academic.oup.com

  45. Freeman M (1970) Project design and evaluation with multiple objectives

  46. Gao S, Wang Y, Cheng J et al (2016) Ant colony optimization with clustering for solving the dynamic location routing problem. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gecevska V, Veza I, Cus F, et al (2011) Lean PLM-information technology strategy for innovative and sustainable business environment. researchgate.net

  48. Ghemraoui R, Mathieu L, Tricot N (2009) Design method for systematic safety integration. CIRP Ann 58:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ghemraoui R, Mathieu L, Tricot N (2009b) Systematic human-safety analysis approach based on Axiomatic Design principles. In: International Conference on Axiomatic Design, 5th ICAD. pp 25–27

  50. Group ZC, Andresen A, et al (1991) Construction and beam test of the ZEUS forward and rear calorimeter. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  51. Handl J, Knowles J, Bioinformatics DK (2005) Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis. academic.oup.com

  52. Hein L, Ishii K, Coughlin S, et al (1994) Intracellular targeting and trafficking of thrombin receptors. A novel mechanism for resensitization of a G protein-coupled receptor. ASBMB

  53. Hislop D, Bosua R, Helms R (2018) Knowledge management in organizations: a critical introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hofman A, Breteler MMB, van Duijn CM et al (2007) The Rotterdam Study: objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol 22:819–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-007-9199-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Holzner P, Rauch E, Spena PR, Matt DT (2015) Systematic design of SME manufacturing and assembly systems based on axiomatic design. Proc CIRP 34:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hoyle D (2000) Automotive quality systems handbook

  57. Hubert LJ et al (1976) A general statistical framework for assessing categorical clustering in free recall. psycnet.apa.org

  58. Jeschke S, Wilke M (2007) KEA-a mathematical knowledge management system combining Web 2.0 with Semantic Web Technologies. ieeexplore.ieee.org

  59. Ji W, AbouRizk SM, Zaïane OR, et al (2018) Complexity analysis approach for prefabricated construction products using uncertain data clustering. ascelibrary.org

  60. Kamara JM, Anumba CJ, Evbuomwan NFO (2000) Establishing and processing client requirements—a key aspect of concurrent engineering in construction. Eng Constr Archit Manag 7:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Keoleian GA, Menerey D (1994) Sustainable development by design: review of life cycle design and related approaches. Air Waste 44:645–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/1073161X.1994.10467269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kiritsis D (2011) Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things. Comput Aided Design 43(5):479–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kohonen T (1990) The self-organizing map. Proc IEEE 78(9):1464–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kriegel H, Kröger P, Sander J, Zimek A (2011) Density-based clustering. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kuo T, Huang S, engineering HZ-C& industrial (2001) Design for manufacture and design for “X”: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Elsevier

  66. Lahoud I (2013) Un système multi-agents pour la gestion des connaissances hétérogènes et distribuées. Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbeliard

  67. Letters GS-S& probability (1998) A weighted Kendall’s tau statistic. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  68. Li J, Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhao L (2015) Big data in product lifecycle management. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Liersch CM, Hepperle M (2011) A distributed toolbox for multidisciplinary preliminary aircraft design. CEAS Aeronaut J 2:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-011-0024-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Liu Y, Li Z, Xiong H, et al (2010) Understanding of internal clustering validation measures. ieeexplore.ieee.org

  71. Machine UVL-F, T In, et al (2010) Clustering stability: an overview. nowpublishers.com

  72. Marketing VAZ-J (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. journals.sagepub.com

  73. Matt DT, Rauch E (2017) Designing assembly lines for mass customization production systems. Mass customized manufacturing. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 33–54

    Google Scholar 

  74. McLachlan GJ, Peel D (2004) Finite mixture models. Wiley

  75. Milligan GW, Cooper MC (1985) An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50:159–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Mitra D, Science PNG-M (2006) How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. pubsonline.informs.org

  77. Monticolo D, Badin J, Gomes S et al (2015) A meta-model for knowledge configuration management to support collaborative engineering. Comput Ind 66:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Moon SK et al. (2006). Data mining and fuzzy clustering to support product family design. pdfs.semanticscholar.org

  79. Mu E, Pereyra-Rojas M (2017) Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process. pp 7–22

  80. Mukhopadhyay SK, Setaputra R (2007) A dynamic model for optimal design quality and return policies. Eur J Oper Res 180:1144–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Nepal B, Monplaisir L, Design NS-J (2006) A methodology for integrating design for quality in modular product design. Taylor Fr

  82. Newbert SL (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strateg Manag J 28:121–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Ng SK, McLachlan GJ, Yau KK, Lee AH (2004) Modelling the distribution of ischaemic stroke-specific survival time using an EM-based mixture approach with random effects adjustment. Stat Med 23(17):2729–2744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Nieweglowski L (2013) clv: cluster validation techniques

  85. Of BPS-B the concept (1970) The effect of price on purchase behavior. Am Mark Assoc

  86. Oh J, Lee S, Industry JY-C, (2015) A collaboration model for new product development through the integration of PLM and SCM in the electronics industry. Elsevier

  87. Olson JC, Volumes JJ-ACRS (1972) Cue utilization in the quality perception process. acrwebsite.org

  88. Paavel M, Karjust K, CIRP JM-P (2017) PLM Maturity model development and implementation in SME. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  89. Pakhira M, Bandyopadhyay S, recognition UM-P, 2004. Validity index for crisp and fuzzy clusters. Elsevier

  90. Panapakidis IP et al (2017) A hybrid ANN/GA/ANFIS model for very short-term PV power forecasting. ieeexplore.ieee.org

  91. Petiot JF, Salvo C, et al (2009) A cross-cultural study of users’ craftsmanship perceptions in vehicle interior design. researchgate.net

  92. Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harv Bus Rev 74(6):61–78

    Google Scholar 

  93. Qiao L, Efatmaneshnik M, et al (2017) Product modular analysis with design structure matrix using a hybrid approach based on MDS and clustering. Taylor Fr

  94. Rajagopal D (2011) Customer data clustering using data mining technique. arXiv:1112.2663

  95. Reich Y, Engineering SVB-AI, et al (1999) Evaluating machine learning models for engineering problems. Elsevier

  96. Reich Y, Formation SJF-C (1991) The formation and use of abstract concepts in design. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  97. Reich Y, Systems AK-DS (2005) A framework for organizing the space of decision problems with application to solving subjective, context-dependent problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  98. Review DAG-S management (1984) What does “hltoduct Quality” really mean. oqrm.org

  99. Saaty TL (2014a) Analytic heirarchy process. In: Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK

  100. Saaty TL (2014b) Analytic heirarchy process. Wiley statsRef Stat Ref online

  101. Sadeghi L, Mathieu L, Design NT et al (2013a) Toward design for safety Part 1: Functional reverse engineering driven by axiomatic design. pdfs.semanticscholar.org

  102. Sadeghi L, Mathieu L, Tricot N, et al (2013b) Toward design for safety part 2: functional re-engineering using axiomatic design and FMEA. axiod.com

  103. Sajana T, Rani CMS, et al (2016) A survey on clustering techniques for big data mining. researchgate.net

  104. Samarasinghe T, Mendis P, Aye L, Vassos T (2016) Applications of design for excellence in prefabricated building services systems

  105. Saraee M, Moghimi M, et al (2011) Modeling batch annealing process using data mining techniques for cold rolled steel sheets. dl.acm.org

  106. Sarvary M (1999) Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. Calif Manag Rev 41:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Shi W, Zeng W (2014) Application of k-means clustering to environmental risk zoning of the chemical industrial area. Front Environ Sci Eng 8:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0581-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Simula O, Vasara P et al (1999) The self-organizing map in industry analysis. books.google.com

  109. Sohlenius G (1992) Concurrent engineering. CIRP Ann 41(2):645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Stark J (2011) Decision engineering: product lifecycle management: 21st century paradigm for product realisation

  111. Statistical HL-J et al (1967) On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. amstat.tandfonline.com

  112. Swan SH, Beaumont JJ, Hammond SK et al (2010) Historical cohort study of spontaneous abortion among fabrication workers in the semiconductor health study: agent-level analysis. Am J Ind Med 28:751–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700280610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Swink M, Talluri S et al (2006) Faster, better, cheaper: a study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Elsevier, Amterdam

    Google Scholar 

  114. Sy M, Mascle C (2011) Product design analysis based on life cycle features. J Eng Des 22:387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820903409899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes

  116. Terzi S, Bouras A, Dutta D, et al (2010) Product lifecycle management-from its history to its new role. academia.edu

  117. Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K (2008) Pattern recognition & matlab intro. Pattern Recognit

  118. Tracey M (2013) Purchasing’s role in global new product-process development projects. Elsevier

  119. Triantaphyllou E, et al (1995) Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. academia.edu

  120. Triantaphyllou E (2002) Multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications. In: Proceedings of 30th international conference of computers & industrial engineering. Thessaloniki-Peres ZITI Press, Thessaloniki, pp 28-1

  121. Ulloa C, Nuñez JM, Lin C, et al (2018) AHP-based design method of a lightweight, portable and flexible air-based PV-T module for UAV shelter hangars. Elsevier

  122. Umeshini S, PSumathi C (2017) ASurvey ON DATA MINING IN STEEL INDUSTRIES. pdfs.semanticscholar.org

  123. Vesanto J et al (2000) Clustering of the self-organizing map. Citeseer

  124. Von Luxburg U (2010) Clustering stability: an overview. Found Trends®. Mach Learn 2(3):235–274

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  125. Walesiak M, Dudek A, Dudek M (2016) clusterSim: Searching for optimal clustering procedure for a data set. R package version 0.45–1

  126. Wu J, Milton DK, et al (1999) Hierarchical cluster analysis applied to workers exposures in fiberglass insulation manufacturing. academic.oup.com

  127. Xu R, Wunsch D (2005) Survey of clustering algorithms

  128. Yıldız T, Sciences ZA-P-S (2015) Clustering and innovation concepts and innovative clusters: an application on technoparks in Turkey. Elsevier

  129. Younesi M, et al (2015) A framework for sustainable product design: a hybrid fuzzy approach based on quality function deployment for environment. Elsevier

  130. Yu (2016) Approach to automation of lens components centering for assembling of different design objectives. ntv.ifmo.ru

  131. Zhang B, Zhang C et al (2004) Competitive EM algorithm for finite mixture models. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  132. Zhang HC, Kuo TC, Lu H, et al (1997) Environmentally conscious design and manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. Elsevier

  133. Zhang Z, Dai BT, et al (2008) AKHT the 25th international conference on, 2008. Estimating local optimums in EM algorithm over Gaussian mixture model. dl.acm.org

  134. Zheng GJ, Zhang JW, Hu P, et al (2015) Optimization of hot forming process using data mining techniques and finite element method. Springer, Berlin

  135. Zhu W, He Y (2017) Green product design in supply chains under competition. Eur J Oper Res 258:165–180

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abla Chaouni Benabdellah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benabdellah, A.C., Benghabrit, A., Bouhaddou, I. et al. Design for relevance concurrent engineering approach: integration of IATF 16949 requirements and design for X techniques. Res Eng Design 31, 323–351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00339-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Automotive sector
  • Design for X
  • Design for relevance
  • Product lifecycle
  • Design factors
  • Unsupervised learning
  • Concurrent engineering