Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of robust design methodology: case study of the infamous GM ignition switch recall

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While a systematic quality strategy is of crucial importance for the success of manufacturing companies, the universal applicability and effectiveness of implemented quality management practices were called into question by a number of major product recalls in recent years. This article seeks to illustrate how already simple analyses and early stage design methods can help to better understand one of the potential reasons for these failures, namely the variation inherent in manufacturing, assembly, and use processes. Usually thoroughly controlled in production, it seems as if particularly the risk of unanticipated variation effects remain largely underestimated and thus unaccounted for in design practice, sometimes with disastrous consequences. To foster the awareness of this variation and to illustrate the benefits of its early consideration in product development, this paper reviews one of the most infamous recalls in automotive history, that of the GM ignition switch, from the perspective of Robust Design. It is investigated if available Robust Design methods such as sensitivity analysis, tolerance stack-ups, design clarity, etc. would have been suitable to account for the performance variation, which has led to a number of fatal product defects and the recall of 30 million vehicles. Furthermore, the disclosed legal case files were examined, offering a unique opportunity to examine how technical malfunctioning of the ignition switch could stay undetected long enough to result in fatalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Reuters (16.09.2015) “GM to pay $900 million, settle U.S. criminal case over ignition switches.” http://www.reuters.com/article/us-gm-probe-idUSKCN0RG2WF20150916, [Accessed 12.07.2016].

  2. The sample, which could be acquired for this research, is obviously far from being representative. Nevertheless, the available physical products offered a valuable first impression on geometric variation of switch components as well as the difference between model years.

  3. For example, Rogers, A. (16.05.2014) “GM to pay record $35 million fine over ignition switch recalls.” http://time.com/102906/gm-fine-ignition-recalls/. [Accessed 12.07.2016].

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Novo Nordisk for the research funding under the DTU-Novo Nordisk Robust Design Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Eifler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eifler, T., Howard, T.J. The importance of robust design methodology: case study of the infamous GM ignition switch recall. Res Eng Design 29, 39–53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0251-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0251-x

Keywords

Navigation