Skip to main content
Log in

Promoting risk communication in early design through linguistic analyses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of function offers significant potential for transforming thinking and reasoning about engineering design as well as providing a common thread for relating together product risk information. This paper focuses specifically on risk data by examining how this information is addressed for a design team conducting early stage design for space missions. A fundamental set of risk elements is proposed based on a linguistic analysis of the risk information needs of the design team. Sample risk statements are then decomposed into a set of key attributes that are used to scrutinize the risk information using three approaches from the pragmatics sub-field of linguistics: (1) Gricean, (2) Relevance Theory, and (3) Functional Analysis. Based on the deficiencies identified in this analysis, a format for the communication of risk data by explicitly accounting for five risk attributes developed in this work is formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S, Wallace K (2003) Evaluating a functional basis. In: ASME Proceedings of design engineering technical conferences, DETC2003/DTM-48685

  • Barsalou LW (1992) Cognitive psychology: an overview for cognitive scientists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Philadelphia

  • Gluch D (1994) A construct for describing software development risks (CMU/SEI-94-TR-14). Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

  • Green DW (1996) Cognitive science: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford

  • Hirtz J, Stone R, McAdams D, Szykman S, Wood K (2002) A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res Eng Des 13(2):65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka V, Eder W (2001) Functions revisited. In: ICED 2001, Glasgow, Scotland

  • Kaplan S, Garrick J (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopena J, Regli W (2003) Functional modeling of engineering designs for the semantic web. IEEE data engineering bulletin, December

  • Mark G (1992) Extreme collaboration. Commun ACM 45(6):89–93. doi:10.1145/508448.508453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshkat CS, Moran T (2003) Risk based decision tool for space exploration missions. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics space Conference and Exhibition, AIAA 2003–6377

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (1993) Integration definition for functional modeling (IDEF0)

  • Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (1999) DSMC risk management guide for DoD acquisition, 2nd edn. Defense Systems Management College Press, Fort Belvoir

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Pahl G, Wallace K (2002) Using the Concept of functions to help synthesise solutions. In: Chakrabarti A (Ed) Engineering Design Synthesis, Springer, New York, pp 109–119

  • Stone R, Tumer I, Van Wie M (2005) The function failure design method. J Mech Des 127(3):397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Szykman SW, Racz J, Sriram RD (1999) The representation of function in computer-based design. In: ASME Proceedings of design engineering technical conferences, DETC1999/DTM-8742

  • Tumer I, Stone R (2003) Mapping function to failure mode during component development. Res Eng Des 14(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumer I, Stone R, Bell D (2003) Requirements for a failure mode taxonomy for use in conceptual design. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design, ICED-1612

  • Uder S, Stone R, Tumer I (2004) Failure analysis in subsystem design for space missions. In: ASME Proceedings of design engineering technical conferences, DETC2004/DTM-57338

  • Van Wie M, Bohm M, Barrientos F, Tumer I, Stone R (2005) Learning from failures: archiving and designing with failure and risk. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computer-aided industrial design and conceptual design. Delft, The Netherlands

  • Wilson R, Keil F (1999) The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. A Bradford book. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Grantham Lough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lough, K.G., Van Wie, M., Stone, R. et al. Promoting risk communication in early design through linguistic analyses. Res Eng Design 20, 29–40 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0063-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0063-8

Keywords

Navigation