Abstract
The concept of function offers significant potential for transforming thinking and reasoning about engineering design as well as providing a common thread for relating together product risk information. This paper focuses specifically on risk data by examining how this information is addressed for a design team conducting early stage design for space missions. A fundamental set of risk elements is proposed based on a linguistic analysis of the risk information needs of the design team. Sample risk statements are then decomposed into a set of key attributes that are used to scrutinize the risk information using three approaches from the pragmatics sub-field of linguistics: (1) Gricean, (2) Relevance Theory, and (3) Functional Analysis. Based on the deficiencies identified in this analysis, a format for the communication of risk data by explicitly accounting for five risk attributes developed in this work is formulated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed S, Wallace K (2003) Evaluating a functional basis. In: ASME Proceedings of design engineering technical conferences, DETC2003/DTM-48685
Barsalou LW (1992) Cognitive psychology: an overview for cognitive scientists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Philadelphia
Gluch D (1994) A construct for describing software development risks (CMU/SEI-94-TR-14). Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
Green DW (1996) Cognitive science: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford
Hirtz J, Stone R, McAdams D, Szykman S, Wood K (2002) A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res Eng Des 13(2):65–82
Hubka V, Eder W (2001) Functions revisited. In: ICED 2001, Glasgow, Scotland
Kaplan S, Garrick J (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27
Kopena J, Regli W (2003) Functional modeling of engineering designs for the semantic web. IEEE data engineering bulletin, December
Mark G (1992) Extreme collaboration. Commun ACM 45(6):89–93. doi:10.1145/508448.508453
Meshkat CS, Moran T (2003) Risk based decision tool for space exploration missions. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics space Conference and Exhibition, AIAA 2003–6377
National Institute of Standards and Technology (1993) Integration definition for functional modeling (IDEF0)
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (1999) DSMC risk management guide for DoD acquisition, 2nd edn. Defense Systems Management College Press, Fort Belvoir
Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach, Springer, Heidelberg
Pahl G, Wallace K (2002) Using the Concept of functions to help synthesise solutions. In: Chakrabarti A (Ed) Engineering Design Synthesis, Springer, New York, pp 109–119
Stone R, Tumer I, Van Wie M (2005) The function failure design method. J Mech Des 127(3):397–407
Szykman SW, Racz J, Sriram RD (1999) The representation of function in computer-based design. In: ASME Proceedings of design engineering technical conferences, DETC1999/DTM-8742
Tumer I, Stone R (2003) Mapping function to failure mode during component development. Res Eng Des 14(1):25–33
Tumer I, Stone R, Bell D (2003) Requirements for a failure mode taxonomy for use in conceptual design. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design, ICED-1612
Uder S, Stone R, Tumer I (2004) Failure analysis in subsystem design for space missions. In: ASME Proceedings of design engineering technical conferences, DETC2004/DTM-57338
Van Wie M, Bohm M, Barrientos F, Tumer I, Stone R (2005) Learning from failures: archiving and designing with failure and risk. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computer-aided industrial design and conceptual design. Delft, The Netherlands
Wilson R, Keil F (1999) The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. A Bradford book. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lough, K.G., Van Wie, M., Stone, R. et al. Promoting risk communication in early design through linguistic analyses. Res Eng Design 20, 29–40 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0063-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0063-8