C-K design theory: an advanced formulation

  • Armand HatchuelEmail author
  • Benoit Weil
Original Paper


C-K theory is a unified Design theory and was first introduced in 2003 (Hatchuel and Weil 2003). The name “C-K theory” reflects the assumption that Design can be modelled as the interplay between two interdependent spaces with different structures and logics: the space of concepts (C) and the space of knowledge (K). Both pragmatic views of Design and existing Design theories define Design as a dynamic mapping process between required functions and selected structures. However, dynamic mapping is not sufficient to describe the generation of new objects and new knowledge which are distinctive features of Design. We show that C-K theory captures such generation and offers a rigorous definition of Design. This is illustrated with an example: the design of Magnesium-CO2 engines for Mars explorations. Using C-K theory we also discuss Braha and Reich’s topological structures for design modelling (Braha and Reich 2003). We interpret this approach as special assumptions about the stability of objects in space K. Combining C-K theory and Braha and Reich’s models opens new areas for research about knowledge structures in Design theories. These findings confirm the analytical and interpretative power of C-K theory.


Design theory Innovation Creativity 


  1. Abadi M, Cardelli L (1996) A theory of objects. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben Mahmoud-Jouini S, Charue-Duboc F, and Fourcade F, (2006) Managing creativity process in innovation driven competition. In: Proceedings of the 13th international product development management conference (IPDM), Milano, Italy, pp 111–126Google Scholar
  3. Blessing L (2003) What is engineering design research? In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design (ICED’03), Stockholm, Sweden, pp 9–10Google Scholar
  4. Braha D, Reich Y (2003) Topological structures for modelling engineering design processes. Res Eng Des 14(4):185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doumas B (2004) Implémentation de la théorie C-K dans le cadre de la gestion d’ontologies. Un outil d’aide à la conception innovante. Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Nantes et Dassault Systèmes, Paris, NantesGoogle Scholar
  6. Elmquist M, Segrestin B (2007) Towards a new logic for front end management: from drug discovery to drug design in pharmaceutical R&D. J Creat Innov Manage 16(2):106–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evbwuoman NF, Sivaloganathan S, Jebb A (1996) A survey of design philosophy, models, methods and systems. J Eng Manuf 210:301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fredriksson B (2003) Engineering design-theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design (ICED’03), Stockholm, Sweden, pp 7–8Google Scholar
  9. Gero JS (1996) Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: concepts and framework. Knowl Based Syst 9(7):435–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C-K theory. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design (ICED’03), Stockholm, Sweden, pp 109–124Google Scholar
  11. Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, and Weil B (2004) C-K Theory in practice: lessons from industrial applications”.In: Proceedings of the 8th international design conference, Dubrovnik, pp 245–257Google Scholar
  12. Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B (2005) The development of science-based products: managing by design spaces. J Creat Innov Manag 14(4):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofstader D (1995) Fluid concepts and creative analogies: computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Jech T (2002) Set theory, 3rd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. Kazakçi AO, Tsoukias A (2005) Extending the C-K design theory: a theoretical background for personal design assistants. J Eng Des 16(4):399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Masson P, Magnusson P (2002) Toward an understanding of user involvement contribution to the design of mobile telecommunications Services. In: Proceedings of 9th international product development management conference (IPDM). Sophia Antipolis, France, pp 497–511Google Scholar
  17. Le Masson P, Weil B, Hatchuel A (2006) Les processus d’innovation. Conception innovante et croissance des entreprises. Hermès, Paris; forthcoming English translation (2009) Strategy and management of innovative designGoogle Scholar
  18. Pahl G, Beitz W (1984) Engineering design, a systematic approach. The Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Reich Y (1995) A critical review of general design theory. Res Eng Des 7:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salustri FA (2005) Representing C-K theory with an action logic. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design (ICED’05), Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Shafirovich E, Salomon M, Gökalp I (2003) Mars Hopper vs Mars Rover. In: Proceedings of the 5th IAA international conference on low-cost planetary missions. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp 97–102Google Scholar
  22. Shai O, Reich Y (2004a) Infused design: 1 Theory. Res Eng Des 15:93–107Google Scholar
  23. Shai O, Reich Y (2004b) Infused design: 2 Practice. Res Eng Des 15:108–121Google Scholar
  24. Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Simon HA (1979) Models of thought. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon HA (1995) Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving in design. In: Collen A, Gasparski WW (eds) Design and systems: general application of methodology. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 245–257Google Scholar
  27. Suh NP (1990) Principles of design. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshikawa H (1981) General design theory and a CAD system. In: Sata E, Warman E (eds) Man–machine communication in CAD/CAM, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 35–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mines ParisTech, CGS-Centre de Gestion ScientifiqueParis Cedex 06France

Personalised recommendations