Advertisement

Research in Engineering Design

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 207–231 | Cite as

Incorporating manufacturability considerations during design of injection molded multi-material objects

  • Ashis Gopal Banerjee
  • Xuejun Li
  • Greg Fowler
  • Satyandra K. Gupta
Original Paper

Abstract

The presence of an already molded component during the second and subsequent molding stages makes multi-material injection molding different from traditional injection molding process. Therefore, designing multi-material molded objects requires addressing many additional manufacturability considerations. In this paper, we first present an approach to systematically identifying potential manufacturability problems that are unique to the multi-material molding processes and design rules to avoid these problems. Then we present a comprehensive manufacturability analysis approach that incorporates both the traditional single material molding rules as well as the specific rules that have been identified for multi-material molding. Our analysis shows that sometimes the traditional rules need to be suppressed or modified. Lastly, for each of the new manufacturability problem, this paper describes algorithms for automatically detecting potential occurrences and generating redesign suggestions. These algorithms have been implemented in a computer-aided manufacturability analysis system. The approach presented in this paper is applicable to multi-shot and over molding processes. We expect that the manufacturability analysis techniques presented in this paper will help in decreasing the product development time for the injection molded multi-material objects.

Keywords

Automated manufacturability analysis Generation of redesign suggestions Multi-material injection molding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported in part by NSF grants DMI0093142 and DMI0457058, and Army Research Office through MAV MURI Program (Grant No. ARMY-W911NF0410176). Opinions expressed in this paper are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect opinion of the sponsors.

References

  1. Ahn HK, Berg M, Bose P, S.W Cheng, Halperin D, Matoušek J, Schwarzkopf O (2002) Separating an object from its cast. Comput Aided Des 34(8):547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakerjian R (1992) Design for manufacturability. Tool and manufacturing engineers handbook, vol. 6. Society of Manufacturing EngineersGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee AG, Gupta SK (2006) A step towards automated design of side actions for injection molding of complex parts. Geometric modeling and processing, 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4077, pp 500–513Google Scholar
  4. Bryce DM (1996) Plastic injection molding. Society of Manufacturing EngineersGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Rosen DW (2002) A region based method to automated design of multi-piece molds with application to rapid tooling. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 2(2):86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Rosen DW (2003) A reverse glue approach to automated construction of multi-piece molds. J Comp Inf Sci Eng 3(3):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen LL, Chou SY, Woo TC (1993) Parting directions for mould and die design. Comput Aided Des 25(12):762–768zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhaliwal S, Gupta SK, Huang J, Priyadarshi A (2003) Algorithms for computing global accessibility cones. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 3(3):200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elber G, Chen X, Cohen E (2005) Mold accessibility via gauss map analysis. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 5(2):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu MW, Fuh JYH, Nee AYC (1999) Undercut feature recognition in an injection mould design system. Comput Aided Des 31(12):777–790zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. General Electric (1960) Manufacturing producability handbook. Manufacturing services. Schenectady, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu Z, Zhou Z, Gao S, Shi J (1999) Determination of mold parting direction based on automatic molding feature recognition. ASME computers and information in engineering conference. Las Vegas, NV, DETC99/CIE-9199Google Scholar
  13. Gupta SK (1997) Using manufacturing planning to generate manufacturability feedback. ASME J Mech Des 119:73–79Google Scholar
  14. Gupta SK, Nau DS (1995) Systematic approach to analyzing the manufacturability of machined parts. Comput Aided Des 27(5):323–342zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta SK, Das D, Regli WC, Nau DS (1997) Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey. Res Eng Des 9(3):168–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta SK, Nau DS, Regli WC (1998) IMACS: a case study in real-world planning. IEEE Int Syst 13(3):49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes CC (1996) P3: a process planner for manufacturability analysis. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 12(2):220–234CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes CC, Sun HC (1994) Plan-based generation of design suggestions. In: Proceedings of the ASME winter annual meeting, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes CC, Desa S, Wright PK (1989) Using process planning knowledge to make design suggestions concurrently. In: Proceedings of the ASME winter annual meeting, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  20. K C Hui (1997) Geometric aspects of the mouldability of parts. Comput Aided Des 29(3):197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishii K, Miller RA (1992) Design representation for manufacturability evaluation in CAD. In: Proceedings of the ASME computers in engineering conference, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kharderkar R, Burton G, McMains S (2005) Finding feasible mold parting directions using graphics hardware. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on solid and physical modeling. Cambridge, MA, pp 233–243Google Scholar
  23. Li X (2003) Geometric algorithms for automated design of multi-stage molds for manufacturing multi-material objects. Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Li X, Gupta SK (2004) Geometric algorithms for automated design of rotary-platen multi-shot molds. Comput Aided Des 36(12):1171–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu HY, Lee WB (2000) Detection of interference elements and release directions in die-cast and injection-moulded components. J Eng Manuf 214(B6):431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malloy RA (1994) Plastic part design for injection molding: and introduction. Hanser Gardner Publications, Inc., Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  27. McMains S, Chen X (2004) Determining moldability and parting directions for polygons with curved edges. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Anaheim, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Menges G, Michaeli W, Mohren P (2001) How to make injection molds. Hanser Gardner Publications, Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  29. Poli C (2001) Design for manufacturing, a structured approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  30. Priyadarshi AK (2006) Algorithms for generating multi-stage molding plans for articulated assemblies. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  31. Priyadarshi AK, Gupta SK (2004) Geometric algorithms for automated design of multi-piece permanent molds. Comput Aided Des 36(3):241–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosen DW, Dixon JR, Poli C, Dong X (1992) Features and algorithms for tooling cost evaluation in injection molding and die casting. In: Proceedings of the ASME international computers in engineering conference. San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  33. Shankar SR, Jansson DG (1993) A generalized methodology for evaluating manufacturability. Concurrent engineering, contemporary issues and modern design tools. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Trucks HE (1987) Designing for economic production. Society of Manufacturing EngineersGoogle Scholar
  35. van Vliet J, Luffervelt C, Kalas H (1999) State of art report on design for manufacturing. In: Proceeding of the ASME design for manufacturing conference. Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  36. Wong T, Tan ST, Sze WS (1998) Parting line formation by slicing a 3D CAD model. Eng Comput 14(4):330–343zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yin Z, Ding H, Xiong Y (2001) Virtual prototyping of mold design: geometric mouldability analysis for near-net-shape manufactured parts by feature recognition and geometric reasoning. Comput Aided Des 33(2):137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashis Gopal Banerjee
    • 1
  • Xuejun Li
    • 1
  • Greg Fowler
    • 1
  • Satyandra K. Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department and The Institute for Systems ResearchUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations