Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 453–472

Comparison of dynamical cores for NWP models: comparison of COSMO and Dune

  • Slavko Brdar
  • Michael Baldauf
  • Andreas Dedner
  • Robert Klöfkorn
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00162-012-0264-z

Cite this article as:
Brdar, S., Baldauf, M., Dedner, A. et al. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. (2013) 27: 453. doi:10.1007/s00162-012-0264-z


We present a range of numerical tests comparing the dynamical cores of the operationally used numerical weather prediction (NWP) model COSMO and the university code Dune, focusing on their efficiency and accuracy for solving benchmark test cases for NWP. The dynamical core of COSMO is based on a finite difference method whereas the Dune core is based on a Discontinuous Galerkin method. Both dynamical cores are briefly introduced stating possible advantages and pitfalls of the different approaches. Their efficiency and effectiveness is investigated, based on three numerical test cases, which require solving the compressible viscous and non-viscous Euler equations. The test cases include the density current (Straka et al. in Int J Numer Methods Fluids 17:1–22, 1993), the inertia gravity (Skamarock and Klemp in Mon Weather Rev 122:2623–2630, 1994), and the linear hydrostatic mountain waves of (Bonaventura in J Comput Phys 158:186–213, 2000).


Compressible flow Euler Navier–Stokes Discontinuous Galerkin Finite differences Density current Inertia gravity 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slavko Brdar
    • 1
  • Michael Baldauf
    • 2
  • Andreas Dedner
    • 3
  • Robert Klöfkorn
    • 4
  1. 1.Section of Applied MathematicsUniversity of FreiburgFreiburg in BreisgauGermany
  2. 2.Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)Offenbach am MainGermany
  3. 3.Warwick Mathematical InstituteCoventryUK
  4. 4.Institut für Angewandte Analysis und Numerische Simulation (IANS)University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations