A numerical investigation of the barotropic instability on the equatorial β-plane

Original Article

Abstract

The barotropic instability of horizontal shear flows is investigated by using two numerical algorithms to solve the equatorial β-plane barotropic equations. The first is the Arakawa Jacobian method (Arakawa, in J Comput Phys 1:119–143, 1966), which is a second-order-centered finite differences scheme that conserves energy and enstrophy, and the second is the fourth-order essentially non-oscillatory scheme for non-linear PDE’s of Osher and Shu (SIAM J Numer Anal 28:907–922, 1991), which is designed to track sharp fronts. We are interested in the performance of these two methods in tracking the long-time behavior of the instability, under the influence of the non-linearity, in the simple case of a Helmholtz shear layer. The associated linear problem is solved analytically, and the linear solution is used as an initial condition for the numerical simulations. We run a series of numerical simulations using both methods with various grid refinements and with two different amplitudes of the initial perturbation. A small viscosity term is added to the vorticity equation to damp the grid-scale waves for Arakawa’s method. This is not necessary for the high-order ENO-4 scheme, which has its own grid-scale dissipation. At high resolution, the two methods are in good agreement; they yield qualitatively and quantitatively the same solution in the long run: for small disturbances, the total flow stabilizes into a steady-state meridional shear with a smooth profile near the equator, while strong disturbances merge together to form a single large-scale vortex that propagates westward, along the equator, consistent with the African easterly waves and the monsoons trough circulation. At coarse resolution, however, Arakawa’s method seems to be much superior to the fourth-order ENO-4 scheme as it provides solutions that are more consistent with the fine resolution one.

Keywords

Arakawa Jacobian Essentially non-oscillatory schemes Equatorial Rossby waves Atmospheric circulation Barotropic instability Vorticity Shear flow Stream function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arakawa A.: Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion, two-dimensional Incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 1, 119–143 (1966)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arakawa A., Lamb V.: A potential enstrophy and energy conserving scheme for the shallow water equations. MWR 109, 18–136 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abba’ A., Bonaventura L.: A vorticity preserving finite difference discretization for the incompressible Navier-stokes equations. Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 56, 1101–1106 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benoit Cushman R., Jean-Marie B.: Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Physical and Numerical Aspects. Academic Press, Waltham, MA (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonaventura L., Ringler T.: Analysis of discrete shallow water models on geodesic Delaunay grids with C-type staggering. MWR 133, 2351–2373 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burpee R.W.: The origin and structure of easterly waves in the lower troposphere of North Africa. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 77–90 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dunn G.E., Miller B.I.: Atlantic Hurricanes, pp. 377. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (1960)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferguson J., Khouider B., Namazi M.: Two-way interactions between equatorially-trapped waves and the barotropic flow. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 30, 2943–2975 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fjortof R.: Application of integral theorems in deriving creteria of stability for laminar flow and the baroclinic circular vortex. Geofys. Publ. 17, 52 (1950)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gill A.: Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, New York, NY (1982)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howard L.N., Drazin P.G.: On instability of parallel flow of inviscid fluid in rotating system with variable Coriolis parameter. J. Math. Phys. 43, 83–99 (1964)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janjic Z.I.: Nonlinear advection schemes and energy cascade on semi-staggered grids. MWR 111, 1234–1245 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kacimi, A., Aliziane, T., Khouider, B.: The Arakawa Jacobian method and a fourth-order essentially nonoscillatory scheme for the beta-plane barotropic equations. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. Submitted (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keshavamurty R.N., Asnani G.C., Pillai P.V., Das S.K.: Some studies of the growth of monsoon disturbances. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. E & P Sci. 87A(3), 61–75 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khouider B., Majda A.: A non-oscillatory balanced scheme for an idealized tropical climate model. Part I: Algorithm and validation. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 19, 1–24 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khouider B., Majda A.: A non-oscillatory balanced scheme for an idealized tropical climate model. Part II: Nonlinear coupling and moisture effects. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 19, 355–375 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo H.L.: Dynamic instability of two-dimensional non divergent flow in a barotropic atmosphere. J. Meteor. 6, 105–122 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    LeVeque R.J.: Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leveque R.L.: Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations: Steady-State and Time-Dependent Problems. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lindzen R.S., Rosenthal A.J.: On the instability of Helmholtz velocity profiles in stably stratified fluids when a lower boundary is present. J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1561–1571 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindzen R.S., Tung K.K.: Wave overreflection and shear instability. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1626–1632 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Majda A., Biello J.: The nonlinear interaction of barotropic and equatorial baroclinic Rossby waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 60, 1809–1821 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Majda A.: Introduction to PDE and Waves for Atmosphere and Ocean. Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematic vol. 9. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morton K.W., Roe P.L.: Vorticity preserving Lax-Wendrof type schemes for the system wave equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 23, 170–192 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nielsen J.E., Schoeberl M.R.: A numerical simulation of barotropic instability. Part II: Wave-wave interaction. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2869–2881 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Osher S., Shu O.: High-order essentialy nonoscillatory schemes for Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 907–922 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pedlosky J.: The stability of currents in the atmosphere and the oceans. Part I. J. Atmos. Sci. 21, 201–219 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perot B.: Conservation properties of unstructured staggered mesh schemes. JCP 159, 58–89 (2000)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rayleigh L.: On the instability of the jets. Sci. Pap. 1, 361–371 (1879)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rayleigh, L.: On the stability, or instability, of certain fluid motions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 9, 57–70 (1880). (Reprinted in Scientific Papers by Lord Rayleigh, 3, 594–596 (1880))Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rayleigh, L.: On the stability or instability of certain fluid motions, II. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1887 (also in Lord Rayleigh, Scientific Papers, 3, Cambridge, pp. 17–23 (1887))Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Riehl, H.: Waves in the easterlies and the polar front in the tropics. Misc. Rep. No. 17, Department of Meteorology, University of Chicago, p. 79 (1945)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ringler T.D., Randall D.A.: A potential enstrophy and energy conserving numerical scheme for solution of the shallow-water equations a geodesic grid. MWR 130, 1397–1410 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ringler T.D, Thuburn J., Klemp J.B., Skamarock W.C.: A unified approach to energy conservation and potential vorticity dynamics for arbitrarily-structured C-grids. JCP 229, 3065–3090 (2010)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sadourny R.: The dynamics of finite difference models of the shallow water equations. JSA 32, 680–689 (1975)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schoeberl M.R., Lindzen R.S.: A numerical simulation of barotropic instability. Part I. Wave-mean flow interaction. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 1368–1379 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schoeberl M.R., Nielsen J.E.: A numerical simulation of barotropic instability. Part III. Wave-wave interaction with dissipation. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2869–2881 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Solomon A., Lindzen R.S.: The impact of resolution on a numerical simulation of barotropic instability. J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 3799–3816 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Talley L.D.: Radiating barotrpic instability. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 13, 972–987 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Talley, L.D.: Instabilities and radiation of thin, baroclinic jets. Thesis (PhD). Massachusetts Institute of Thechnology and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institutions (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory AMNEDP, Department of MathematicsUniversity of Sciences and Technology Houari BoumedienneBab Ezzouar, AlgiersAlgeria
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations