Advertisement

Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1181–1194 | Cite as

Thermodynamic coupling between gradient elasticity and a Cahn–Hilliard type of diffusion: size-dependent spinodal gaps

Original Article

Abstract

In the electrode materials of lithium ion batteries, the large variations of Li concentration during the charge and discharge processes are often accompanied by phase separations to lithium-rich and lithium-poor states. In particular, when the composition of the material moves into the spinodal region (linearly unstable uniform compositions) or into the miscibility gap (metastable uniform compositions), it tends to decompose spontaneously under composition fluctuations. If the lattice mismatch of the two phases is not negligible, coherency strains arise affecting the decomposition process. Furthermore, when the dimensions of a specimen or a grain reduce down to the nanometer level, the phase transition mechanisms are also substantially influenced by the domain size. This size effect is interpreted in the present article by developing a thermodynamically consistent model of gradient elastodiffusion. The proposed formulation is based on the coupling of the standard Cahn–Hilliard type of diffusion and a simple gradient elasticity model that includes the gradient of volumetric strain in the expression of the Helmholtz free energy density. An initial boundary value problem is derived in terms of concentration and displacement fields, and linear stability analysis is employed to determine the contribution of concentration and strain gradient terms on the instability leading to spinodal decomposition. It is shown that the theoretical predictions are in accordance with the experimental trends, i.e., the spinodal concentration range shrinks (i.e., the tendency for phase separation is reduced) as the crystal size decreases. Moreover, depending on the interplay between the strain and the concentration gradient coefficients, the spinodal region can be completely suppressed below a critical crystal size. Spinodal characteristic length and time are also evaluated by considering the dominant instability mode during the primary stages of the decomposition process, and it is found that they are increasing functions of the strain gradient coefficient.

Keywords

Gradient elasticity Spinodal decomposition Size effects Diffusion Coherency strains Stability analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support by the General Secretariat of Research and Technology (GSRT) of Greece and by the European Union under the projects “Shift of the Phase Equilibria in Nanograined Materials” (ERA-NET scheme, no.88839) and “Internal Length Gradient Mechanics across Scales and Materials: Theory, Experiments and Applications” (No. 88257) is acknowledged. The support of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation under Mega Grant Project “Fabrication and Study of Advanced Multi-Functional Metallic Materials with Extremely High Density of Defects” (No. 14.Z50.31.0039) to Togliatti State University is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Meethong, N., Huang, H.-Y.S., Carter, W.C., Chiang, Y.M.: Size-dependent lithium miscibility gap in nanoscale Li\(_{1-x}\)FePO\(_{4}\). Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 10(5), A134–A138 (2007). doi: 10.1149/1.2710960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kobayashi, G., Nishimura, S.I., Park, M.S., Kanno, R., Yashima, M., Ida, T., Yamada, A.: Isolation of solid solution phases in size-controlled Li\(_{x}\)FePO\(_{4}\) at room temperature. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(3), 395–403 (2009). doi: 10.1002/adfm.200801522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orvananos, B., Yu, H.-C., Malik, R., Abdellahi, A., Grey, C.P., Ceder, G., Thornton, K.: Effect of a size-dependent equilibrium potential on nano-LiFePO\(_{4}\) particle interactions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162(9), A1718–A1724 (2015). doi: 10.1149/2.0161509jes CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wagemaker, M., Borghols, W.J.H., Mulder, F.M.: Large impact of particle size on insertion reactions. A case for anatase Li\(_{x}\)TiO\(_{2}\). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(14), 4323–4327 (2007). doi: 10.1021/ja067733p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schimmel, H.G., Huot, J., Chapon, L.C., Tichelaar, F.D., Mulder, F.M.: Hydrogen cycling of niobium and vanadium catalyzed nanostructured magnesium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(41), 14348–14354 (2005). doi: 10.1021/ja051508a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han, B.C., Van der Ven, A., Morgan, D., Ceder, G.: Electrochemical modeling of intercalation processes with phase field models. Electrochim. Acta 49(26), 4691–4699 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burch, D., Bazant, M.Z.: Size-dependent spinodal and miscibility gaps for intercalation in nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 9(11), 3795–3800 (2009). doi: 10.1021/nl9019787 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanton, L.G., Bazant, M.Z.: Phase separation with anisotropic coherency strain. arXiv: Cond-Mat. Mtrl-Sci. (2012). arXiv:1202.1626v1
  9. 9.
    Cogswell, D.A., Bazant, M.Z.: Coherency strain and the kinetics of phase separation in LiFePO\(_{4}\) nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6(3), 2215–2225 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nn204177u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anand, L.: A Cahn–Hilliard-type theory for species diffusion coupled with large elastic-plastic deformations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 60, 1983–2002 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.001 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cahn, J.W., Hilliard, J.E.: Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J. Chem. Phys. 28(2), 258–267 (1958). doi: 10.1063/1.1744102 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cahn, J.W.: On spinodal decomposition. Acta Metall. 9(9), 795–801 (1961). doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(61)90182-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, X., Shyy, W., Sastry, A.M.: Numerical simulation of intercalation-induced stress in Li-ion battery electrode particles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154(10), A910–A916 (2007). doi: 10.1149/1.2759840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Purkayastha, R., McMeeking, R.: A parameter study of intercalation of lithium into storage particles in a lithium-ion battery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 80, 2–14 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu, H.T., Zbib, H.M., Aifantis, E.C.: Strain gradients and continuum modeling of size effect in metal matrix composites. Acta Mech. 121(1–4), 165–176 (1997). doi: 10.1007/bf01262530 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aifantis, E.C.: Strain gradient interpretation of size effects. Int. J. Fract. 95, 299–314 (1999). doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4659-3_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleck, N.A., Muller, G.M., Ashby, M.F., Hutchinson, J.W.: Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metall. Mater. 42(2), 475–487 (1994). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleck, N.A., Hutchinson, J.W.: A reformulation of strain gradient plasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 49, 2245–2271 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00049-7 ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsagrakis, I., Aifantis, E.C.: Recent developments in gradient plasticity. Part I: formulation and size effects. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 124(3), 352–357 (2002). doi: 10.1115/1.1479695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsagrakis, I., Konstantinidis, A., Aifantis, E.C.: Strain gradient and wavelet interpretation of size effects in yield and strength. Mech. Mater. 35(8), 733–745 (2003). doi: 10.1016/s0167-6636(02)00205-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aifantis, E.C.: On the role of gradients in the localization of deformation and fracture. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 30(10), 1279–1299 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0020-7225(92)90141-3 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aifantis, E.C.: Gradient effects at macro, micro and nano scales. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 5(3), 355–375 (1994). doi: 10.1515/jmbm.1994.5.3.355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Altan, B.S., Aifantis, E.C.: On some aspects in the special theory of gradient elasticity. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 8(3), 231–282 (1997). doi: 10.1515/jmbm.1997.8.3.231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Altan, S.B., Aifantis, E.C.: On the structure of the mode III crack-tip in gradient elasticity. Scr. Metall. Mater. 26(2), 319–324 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0956-716x(92)90194-j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ru, C.Q., Aifantis, E.C.: A simple approach to solve boundary value problems in gradient elasticity. Acta Mech. 101(1–4), 59–68 (1993). doi: 10.1007/bf01175597 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gutkin, M.Y., Aifantis, E.C.: Dislocations in the theory of gradient elasticity. Scr. Mater. 40(5), 559–566 (1999). doi: 10.1016/s1359-6462(98)00424-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gurtin, M.E.: Generalized Ginzburg–Landau and Cahn–Hilliard equations based on a microforce balance. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom 92(3–4), 178–192 (1996). doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(95)00173-5 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garcke, H.: On a Cahn–Hilliard model for phase separation with elastic misfit. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Nonlinear 22(2), 165–185 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2004.07.001 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mindlin, R.D.: Micro-structure in linear elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 16(1), 51–78 (1964). doi: 10.1007/bf00248490 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Svoboda, J., Turek, I., Fischer, F.D.: Application of the thermodynamic extremal principle to modeling of thermodynamic processes in material sciences. Philos. Mag. 85(31), 3699–3707 (2005). doi: 10.1080/14786430500267760 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hackl, K., Fischer, F.D., Svoboda, J.: A study on the principle of maximum dissipation for coupled and non-coupled non-isothermal processes in materials. Proc. R. Soc. A 467(2128), 1186–1196 (2011). doi: 10.1098/rspa.2010.0179. Addendum: Proc. R. Soc. A 467(2132), 2422–2426 (2011). doi: 10.1098/rspa.2011.0015
  32. 32.
    Nauman, E.B., He, D.Q.: Nonlinear diffusion and phase separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56(6), 1999–2018 (2001). doi: 10.1016/s0009-2509(01)00005-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Flow with small Reynolds numbers (§20). In: Fluid Mechanics (Vol. 6 of Course of Theoretical Physics, 2nd ed.), pp. 58–67. Pergamon Press, New York (1987). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-033933-7.50010-6
  34. 34.
    Chen, G., Song, X., Richardson, T.J.: Electron microscopy study of the LiFePO\(_{4}\) to FePO\(_{4}\) phase transition. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 9(6), A295–A298 (2006). doi: 10.1149/1.2192695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rousse, G., Rodriguez-Carvajal, J., Patoux, S., Masquelier, C.: Magnetic structures of the triphylite LiFePO\(_{4}\) and of its delithiated form FePO\(_{4}\). Chem. Mater. 15(21), 4082–4090 (2003). doi: 10.1021/cm0300462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsagrakis, I., Aifantis, E.C.: On the effect of strain gradient on adiabatic shear banding. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46(10), 4459–4467 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2586-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Triantafyllidis, N., Aifantis, E.C.: A gradient approach to localization of deformation I. Hyperelastic materials. J. Elast. 16(3), 225–237 (1986). doi: 10.1007/bf00040814 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rudraraju, S., Van der Ven, A., Garikipati, K.: Mechanochemical spinodal decomposition: a phenomenological theory of phase transformations in multi-component, crystalline solids. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 16012 (2016). doi: 10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.12 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  3. 3.Beijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina
  4. 4.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  5. 5.Togliatti State UniversityTogliattiRussia

Personalised recommendations