Skip to main content
Log in

Multidisciplinary optimization of the SRV2-O radial compressor using an adjoint-based approach

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing turbomachines requires in many applications to find a suitable compromise between different disciplines, such as aerodynamics, vibration analysis, and structural mechanics. The optimization of such components requires, thus, the concurrent inclusion of all relevant disciplines. This paper presents an efficient gradient-based approach that allows to reach efficiently a compromise when different disciplines are involved. The use of a gradient-based technique guarantees a low computational effort to reach an optimal solution, but faces the challenge of computing the gradients of different disciplines and projecting them on a unified parameter space. This is especially challenging when the solid and fluid domains are governed by different numerical solvers and use different numerical grids. In the present framework, a CAD-based parametrization is used as an intermediate layer that is indifferent to the numerical grid used. This allows to combine sensitivities from different disciplines and grids onto a single set of parameters, and ensures at the same time that at the fluid–solid interface, no overlaps or voids are created between the different numerical grids. The approach is illustrated on the optimization of the SRV2-O radial compressor where concurrently the aerodynamic performance at two different operating points, the impeller moment of inertia, the maximum stress inside the material, and the vibration response of the compressor wheel are considered. Although 112 design variables are used, a 3.5% improvement in efficiency was achieved within less than 25 major iterations, while satisfying all mechanical and aerodynamic constraints. This demonstrates the cost effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agromayor Roberto, Anand Nitish, Müller Jens-Dominik, Pini Matteo, Nord Lars O (2021) A unified geometry parametrization method for turbomachinery blades. Computer-Aided Design, 133: 102987. ISSN 0010-4485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2020.102987. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448520301809

  • Allmaras SR, Johnson FT, Spalart PR (2012) Modifications and clarifications for the implementation of the spalart-allmaras turbulence model. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Big Island, HI, USA, July

  • Barsi D, Costa C, Cravero C, Ricci G (2014) Aerodynamic design of a centrifugal compressor stage using an automatic optimization strategy. In Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Dusseldorf, Germany, June

  • Châtel A (2021) Development of Hybrid Optimization Methods with Applications to Turbomachinery Components. PhD thesis, Université de Mons

  • Châtel Arnaud, Verstraete Tom (2022) Aerodynamic Optimization of the Srv2 Radial Compressor Using an Adjoint-Based Optimization Method. Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Turbo Expo, p 06

  • Cuciumita C, John A, Qin N, Shahpar S (2021) Structurally Constrained Aerodynamic Adjoint Optimisation of Highly Loaded Compressor Blades. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2021-59717

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenlohr Gernot, Krain Hartmut, Richter Franz-Arno, Tiede Valentin (2002) Investigations of the Flow Through a High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Impeller. volume Volume 5: Turbo Expo 2002, Parts A and B of Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, pages 649–657, 06. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2002-30394

  • Ekradi Khalil, Madadi Ali (2020) Performance improvement of a transonic centrifugal compressor impeller with splitter blade by three-dimensional optimization. Energy, 201: 117582. ISSN 0360-5442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117582. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220306897

  • Hottois Romain, Châtel Arnaud, Verstraete Tom, Coussement Grégory, De Bruyn Tom (2022) Comparing gradient-free and gradient-based multi-objective optimization methodologies on the VKI-LS89 turbine vane test case. Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Turbo Expo, p 06

  • Kim JH, Choi JH, Husain A, Kim KY (2009) Design optimization of a centrifugal compressor impeller by multi-objective genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, pages 2–6, Vail, CO, USA, August

  • Li Chenxi, Wang Jing, Guo Zhendong, Song Liming, Li Jun (2019) Aero-mechanical multidisciplinary optimization of a high speed centrifugal impeller. Aerospace Science and Technology, 95: 105452. ISSN 1270-9638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105452. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963818326245

  • Lian Yongsheng, Liou Meng-Sing (2005) Aero-structural optimization of a transonic compressor rotor

  • Martins Joaquim RRA (2002) A coupled-adjoint method for high-fidelity aero-structural optimization

  • Martins JR, Sturdza P, Alonso JJ (2003) The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Transactions on Methematical Software, Association for Computing Machinery 29:245–262

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miller PL, Olivier JH, Tweedt DL (1996) Bladecad: An interactive geometric design tool for turbomachinery blades. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

  • Mueller L (2017) Cad integrated multipoint adjoint-based optimization of a turbocharger radial turbine. Journal of Turbomachinery 3(3):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L, Verstraete T (2019) Adjoint-based multi-point and multi-objective optimization of a turbocharger radial turbine. International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power 4(2):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller L (2019) Adjoint-Based Optimization of Turbomachinery with Applications to Axial and Radial Turbines. PhD thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles

  • Stéphane Pierret, Filomeno Coelho Rajan, Hiroshi Kato (2005) Multidisciplinary and multiple operating points shape optimization of three-dimensional compressor blades. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Pini M, Persico G, Pasquale D, Rebay S (2014) Adjoint Method for Shape Optimization in Real-Gas Flow Applications. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 137(3):032604. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagebaum M, Albring T, Gauger NR (2018) Expression templates for primal value taping in the reverse mode of algorithmic differentiation. Optimization Methods and Software 33(4–6):1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2018.1471140

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach M, Mueller L, Verstraete, T, Gauger NR (2018) Cad-based adjoint multidisciplinary optimization of a radial turbine under structural constraints. In Conference Proceedings of the GPPS (GPPS-NA-2018-133)

  • Schwalbach Marc (2021) An Efficient CAD-Based Multidisciplinary Optimization Framework for Turbomachinery Design. doctoralthesis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:386-kluedo-62778

  • Siller Ulrich, Voß Christian, Nicke Eberhard. Automated Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Transonic Axial Compressor. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-863. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2009-863

  • Steger JL, Sorenson RL (1979) Automatic mesh-point clustering near a boundary in grid generation with elliptic partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics 33:403–410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas PD, Middlecoff JF (1980) Direct control of the grid point distribution in meshes generated by elliptic equations. AIAA Journal 18(6):652–656

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JF, Thames FC, Mastin CW (1974) Automatic numerical generation of body-fitted curvilinear coordinates for a field containing any number of arbitrary two-dimensional bodies. Journal of Computational Physics 15:299–319

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JF, Warsi zua, Wayne Mastin C (1985) Numerical Grid Generation: Foundations and Applications. Elsevier Science Ltd

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete T, Müller L, Aissa MH (2018) Multidisciplinary optimization of turbomachinery components using differential evolution. In VKI Lecture Series on Introduction to Optimization and Multidisciplinary Design, Brussels, Belgium, September

  • Verstraete T (2008) Multidisciplinary Turbomachinery Component Optimization Considering Performance, Stress and Internal Heat Transfer. PhD thesis, Universiteit Gent

  • Wahba W, Tourlidakis A (2001) A genetic algorithm applied to the design of blade profiles for centrifugal pump impellers. In Proceedings of the 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, volume 11, page 14, Anaheim, CA, USA, June

  • Wang X-F, Xi G, Wang Z-H (2006) Aerodynamic optimization design of centrifugal compressor’s impeller with kriging model. Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A-journal of Power and Energy - PROC INST MECH ENG A-J POWER 220(589–597):09. https://doi.org/10.1243/09576509JPE201

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable

Funding

Not Applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Formal analysis A. C.; writing: A. C. and T. V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Verstraete.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Replication of Results

The authors make the data leading to these results available upon email request.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Joe Alexandersen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Topical Collection: Flow-driven Multiphysics

Guest Editors: J Alexandersen, C S Andreasen, K Giannakoglou, K Maute, K Yaji

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Châtel, A., Verstraete, T. Multidisciplinary optimization of the SRV2-O radial compressor using an adjoint-based approach. Struct Multidisc Optim 66, 112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03556-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03556-2

Keywords

Navigation