Skip to main content
Log in

Application of an improved sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis of aeronautical hydraulic pipeline with multiple stochastic responses

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the failure probabilities of multiple failure modes is a challenging task in structural reliability analysis. The conventional sequential importance sampling (conventional SIS) fails to estimate all the failure probabilities in a single run, leading to high computational expense and low efficiency. To address this issue, this study provides an improvement for Sequential Importance Sampling (improved SIS), in which a unified failure event is defined to construct a sequence of intermediate sampling distributions. It iteratively generates samples and drives them gradually approach each failure domain, thus all the failure probabilities of multiple failure modes could be estimated in a single run. Two examples are investigated to demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed improved SIS. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the structural reliability analysis of one aeronautical hydraulic pipeline structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amalnerkar E, Lee TH, Lim W (2020) Reliability analysis using bootstrap information criterionfor small sample size response functions. Struct Multidisc Optim 62:2901–2913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au SK, Beck JL (1999) A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations. Struct Saf 21(2):135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au SK, Beck JL (2001) Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probabilist Eng Mech 16(4):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au SK, Beck JL (2003) Important sampling in high dimensions. Struct Saf 25(2):139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaurepaire P, Jensen HA, Schuëller GI, Valdebenito MA (2013) Reliability-based optimization using bridge importance sampling. Probabilist Eng Mech 34:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher CG (1988) Adaptive sampling—an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure. Struct Saf 5(2):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopin N (2002) A sequential particle filter method for static models. Biometrika 89(3):539–552

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Del Moral P, Doucet A, Jasra A (2006) Sequential monte carlo samplers. J R Stat Soc B 68(3):411–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O, Olesen R, Mohr G (1986) Solution of a class of load combination problems by directional simulation. Struct Saf 4(2):95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O, Melchers RE, Gluver H (1990) General multi-dimensional probability integration by directional simulation. Comput Struct 36(2):355–368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman G (1996) Monte Carlo: concepts, algorithms, and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM (1974) An exact and invariant first order reliability format. J Eng Mech 100(1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu W, Ching J (2010) Evaluating small failure probabilities of multiple limit states by parallel subset simulation. Probabilist Eng Mech 25(3):291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katafygiotis LS, Zuev KM (2007) Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by adaptive linked importance sampling. ECCOMAS thematic fonference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN). Rethymno, Crete, Greece

  • Katafygiotis LS, Zuev KM (2008) Geometric insight into the challenges of solving high-dimensional reliability problems. Probabilist Eng Mech 23(2–3):208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Ma Y, Cao Z (2015) A generalized Subset Simulation approach for estimating small failure probabilities of multiple stochastic responses. Comput Struct 153:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Tang K, Li J, Yao X (2016) Stochastic ranking algorithm for many-objective opti-mization based on multiple indicators. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 20(6):924–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Sun X, Han X, Jiang C, Yu D (2015) Dynamic load identification for stochastic structures based on Gegenbauer polynomial approximation and regularization method. Mech Syst Signal Process 56–57:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Meng X, Xu C, Zhang D, Jiang C (2018) Forward and inverse structural uncertainty propagations under stochastic variables with arbitrary probability distributions. Comput Method Appl Mech 342(1):287–320

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Wei P, Zhou C, Yue Z (2020a) Reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of structure by combining bridging importance sampling and Kriging reliability method. Chin J Aeronaut 169(04):104–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Cao L, Chao J, Ni B, Zhang D (2020b) Parallelotope-formed evidence theory model for quantifying uncertainties with correlation. Appl Math Model 77(1):32–48

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Zhou J, Li X (2018) Monte Carlo simulation based time limited dispatch analysis with the constraint of dispatch reliability for electronic engine control systems. Aerosp Sci Technol 72:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (1989) Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Liu J, Cao L, Yu Z, Yang D (2020) A general frame for uncertainty propagation under multimodally distributed random variables. Comput Method Appl Mech 367(1):113109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neal RM (2001) Annealed importance sampling. Stat Comput 11(2):125–139

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nie J, Ellingwood BR (2000) Directional methods for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 22(3):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou I, Papadimitriou C, Straub D (2016) Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 62:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradlwarter HJ, Pellissetti MF, Schenk CA, Pellissetti MF, Fransen S, Schenk CA, Schueeller GI, Pradlwarter HJ (2005) Realistic and efficient reliability estimation for aerospace structures. Comput Method Appl Mech 194(12–16):1597–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R (2001) Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives. Struct Saf 23(4):365–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R, Flessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9(5):489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuëller GI, Pradlwarter HJ (2007) Benchmark study on reliability estimation in higher dimensions of structural systems—an overview. Struct Saf 29(3):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuëller GI, Stix R (1987) A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities. Struct Saf 4(4):293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuëller GI, Pradlwarter HJ, Koutsourelakis PS (2004) A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions. Probabilist Eng Mech 19(4):463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WX, Zhou CC, Gao HS, Zhang Z (2018) Application of non-probabilistic sensitivity analysis in the optimization of aeronautical hydraulic pipelines. Struct Multidisc Optim 57(6):2177–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao M, Zhang JH, Gao L, Lee S, Eshghi AT (2019) An efficient Kriging-based subset simulation method for hybrid reliability analysis under random and interval variables with small failure probability. Struct Multidisc Optim 59:2077–2092

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yun WY, Lu ZZ, Jiang X (2018) A modified importance sampling method for structural reliability and its global reliability sensitivity analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 57:1625–1641

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yun WY, Lu ZZ, He PF, Dai Y, Feng KX (2020) Adaptive subdomain sampling and its adaptive Kriging–based method for reliability and reliability sensitivity analyses. Struct Multidisc Optim 61:1107–1121

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng M, Pu Y, Zhou H (2018) Adaptive stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability method. Eng Comput 34:671–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Ono T (1999) A general procedure for first/second-order reliability method (FORM/SORM). Struct Saf 21(2):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong CT, Wang MF, Dang C, Ke WH, Guo SQ (2020) First-order reliability method based on Harris Hawks Optimization for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 62:1951–1968

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuchao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

The original codes of the examples in the Sect. 4 are available in the Supplementary materials.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Yoojeong Noh

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Wei, P., He, P. et al. Application of an improved sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis of aeronautical hydraulic pipeline with multiple stochastic responses. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03151-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03151-3

Keywords

Navigation