Abstract
This article brings forward a new computational method for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of complex mechanical systems subject to input random variables following arbitrary, dependent probability distributions. It involves a generalized polynomial chaos expansion (GPCE) for reliability analysis subject to dependent input random variables, a novel fusion of the GPCE approximation and score functions for estimating the sensitivities of the failure probability with respect to design variables, and standard gradient-based optimization algorithms, resulting in a multi-point single-step design process. The method, designated as the multi-point single-step GPCE method or simply the MPSS-GPCE method, yields analytical formulae for computing the failure probability and its design sensitivities concurrently from a single stochastic simulation or analysis. For this reason, the MPSS-GPCE method affords the ability to solve industrial-scale problems with large design spaces. Numerical results stemming from mathematical functions or elementary engineering problems indicate that the new method provides more accurate or computationally efficient design solutions than existing methods or reference solutions. Furthermore, the shape design optimization of a jet engine compressor blade root was successfully conducted, demonstrating the power of the new method in confronting practical RBDO problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.











Notes
Here, the symbol \(\sim\) represents equality in a weaker sense, such as equality in mean square, but not necessarily pointwise, nor almost everywhere.
References
ABAQUS (2019) version 2019. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp
Agarwal H, Renaud JE (2006) New decoupled framework for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 44(7):1524–1531
Arora JS (2004) Introduction to optimum design. McGraw-Hill, New York
Browder A (1996) Mathematical analysis: an introduction. Undergraduate texts in mathematics. Springer, Berlin
Chiralaksanakul A, Mahadevan S (2004) First-order approximation methods in reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 127(5):851–857
CREO (2016) version 4.0. PTC
das Neves Carneiro G, António CC (2020) Sobol’ indices as dimension reduction technique in evolutionary-based reliability assessment. Eng Comput 37(1):368–398
das Neves Carneiro G, Antonio CC (2021) Dimensional reduction applied to the reliability-based robust design optimization of composite structures. Compos Struct 255:112937
Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des 126(2):225–233
Fernandes AD, Atchley WR (2006) Gaussian quadrature formulae for arbitrary positive measures. Evol Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430600200010
Gautschi W (2004) Structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Numerical mathematics and scientific computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gu X, Lu J, Wang H (2015) Reliability-based design optimization for vehicle occupant protection system based on ensemble of metamodels. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(2):533–546
Hadigol M, Doostan A (2018) Least squares polynomial chaos expansion: a review of sampling strategies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 332:382–407
Hassan R, Crossley W (2008) Spacecraft reliability-based design optimization under uncertainty including discrete variables. J Spacecraft Rockets 45(2):394–405
Kang B, Choi K, Kim DH (2017) An efficient serial-loop strategy for reliability-based robust optimization of electromagnetic design problems. IEEE Trans Magn 54(3):1–4
Kuschel N, Rackwitz R (1997) Two basic problems in reliability-based structural optimization. Math Methods Oper Res 46(3):309–333
Lee D, Rahman S (2020) Practical uncertainty quantification analysis involving statistically dependent random variables. Appl Math Model 84:324–356
Lee D, Rahman S (2021) Robust design optimization under dependent random variables by a generalized polynomial chaos expansion. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63(5):2425–2457
Lee I, Choi K, Du L, Gorsich D (2008) Dimension reduction method for reliability-based robust design optimization. Comput Struct 86(13–14):1550–1562
Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for rbdo problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des 10(1115/1):4003186
Lehkỳ D, Slowik O, Novák D (2018) Reliability-based design: artificial neural networks and double-loop reliability-based optimization approaches. Adv Eng Softw 117:123–135
Li L, Wan H, Gao W, Tong F, Li H (2019) Reliability based multidisciplinary design optimization of cooling turbine blade considering uncertainty data statistics. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(2):659–673
Liang J, Mourelatos ZP, Nikolaidis E (2007) A single-loop approach for system reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 129(12):1215–1224
Luthen N, Marelli S, Sudret B (2021) Sparse polynomial chaos expansions: literature survey and benchmark. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quant 9(2):593–649
MATLAB (2019) version 9.7.0 (R2019b). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts
Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S (2020) Probability-space surrogate modeling for fast multidisciplinary optimization under uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 198:106896
Noh Y, Choi K, Du L (2009) Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian Copula. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):1–16
Rahman S (2009) Extended polynomial dimensional decomposition for arbitrary probability distributions. J Eng Mech ASCE 135(12):1439–1451
Rahman S (2009) Stochastic sensitivity analysis by dimensional decomposition and score functions. Probab Eng Mech 24(3):278–287
Rahman S (2018) A polynomial chaos expansion in dependent random variables. J Math Anal Appl 464(1):749–775
Rahman S (2019) Uncertainty quantification under dependent random variables by a generalized polynomial dimensional decomposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:910–937
Rahman S, Wei D (2008) Design sensitivity and reliability-based structural optimization by univariate decomposition. Struct Multidiscip Optim 35(3):245–261
Ren X, Yadav V, Rahman S (2016) Reliability-based design optimization by adaptive-sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):425–452
Rosenblatt M (1952) Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Stat 23:470–472
Rubinstein R, Shapiro A (1993) Discrete event systems: sensitivity analysis and stochastic optimization by the score function method. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Siavashi S, Eamon CD (2019) Development of traffic live-load models for bridge superstructure rating with rbdo and best selection approach. J Bridge Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001457
Stephens R, Fatemi A, Stephens RR, Fuchs H (2000) Metal fatigue in engineering. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Stieltjes TJ (1884) Quelques recherches sur la théorie des quadratures dites mécaniques. Ann Sci l’Écol Norm Supér 1:409–426
Suryawanshi A, Ghosh D (2016) Reliability based optimization in aeroelastic stability problems using polynomial chaos based metamodels. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(5):1069–1080
Toropov V, Filatov A, Polynkin A (1993) Multiparameter structural optimization using FEM and multipoint explicit approximations. Struct Multidiscip Optim 6(1):7–14
Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564
Wiener N (1938) The homogeneous chaos. Am J Math 60(4):897–936
Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24:619–644
Yang IT, Hsieh YH (2013) Reliability-based design optimization with cooperation between support vector machine and particle swarm optimization. Eng Comput 29(2):151–163
Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82(2–3):241–256
Youn BD, Choi K, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(3):272–283
Zhao L, Choi K, Lee I (2011) Metamodeling method using dynamic kriging for design optimization. AIAA J 49(9):2034–2046
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1933114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Replication of results
The results for Examples 1–4 provided in this paper were generated by MATLAB codes developed by the authors. In Example 4, the CAD model of the blade/disk assembly was created by CREO parametric. Then, the FE model was built and solved by ABAQUS/CAE. Finally, the fatigue crack initiation life was analyzed using an in-house MATLAB code. The CAD and FEA processes were fully integrated with the proposed RBDO algorithm for design automation by using MACRO functions and batch files in the MATLAB platform. The interested reader is encouraged to contact the corresponding author for further implementation details by e-mail.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Byeng D. Youn
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Statistical first-moment
Consider the mth-order GPCE approximation \(h_m(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {r})\) of \(h(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {r})\), presented in (12). Applying the expectation operator on \(h_m(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {r})\) and recognizing (7), its mean
coincides with the exact mean of \(h(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {r})\) for any \(m\in \mathbb{N}_0\).
Appendix 2: Sensitivities of the first-moment
For \(k=1,\ldots ,M\), consider the kth first-order score function \(s_k(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {g})\) in (17). Then, applying the full GPCE to \(s_k(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {g})\) leads to
with its GPCE coefficients
Similarly, as shown in (16), by interchanging differential and integral operators and by replacing \(h(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {r})\) and \(s_k(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {g})\) with their mth-order and \(m'\)th-order GPCE approximations, respectively, for \(m,m'\in \mathbb{N}_0\), the sensitivity of the first-moment with respect to \(d_k\) is formulated as follows:
where \(L_{\min }:=\min (L_{N,m},L_{N,m'})\). The approximate sensitivity in (29) converges to \({\partial \mathbb{E}_{\mathbf {g}}[h(\mathbf {Z};\mathbf {r})]}\mathbin {/}{\partial d_k}\) when \(m \rightarrow \infty\) and \(m' \rightarrow \infty\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, D., Rahman, S. Reliability-based design optimization under dependent random variables by a generalized polynomial chaos expansion. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03123-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03123-7