Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization design of metamaterial vibration isolator with honeycomb structure based on multi-fidelity surrogate model

  • Industrial Application Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hexagonal periodic structure of the honeycomb is a magic product of nature and shows great mechanical potential. In this work, a type of metamaterial vibration isolator with a honeycomb structure is proposed. The strain, deformation, and natural frequency of the vibration isolator are calculated by the two-dimensional plane finite element model and the simulation accuracies are validated by the experiments. As the design of the metamaterial vibration isolator involves time-consuming finite-element simulation, a multi-fidelity sequential optimization approach based on feasible region analysis (MF-FA) is proposed. In the proposed method, the refined and coarse mesh models are developed as the high- and low-fidelity models, and a two-phase multi-fidelity updating strategy is carried out. In the first phase, sample points are added to the constraint boundary to find the feasible solution quickly, in the second phase, the quality of the feasible optimization solution is gradually improved in the feasible region until it converges to the global optimal solution. Finally, the optimized metamaterial vibration isolator is manufactured and its superiority is validated. Results illustrate that the proposed approach can obtain a desirable optimum, whose natural frequency error between the experimental and the expected value is improved by 12.67% compared with the initial design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aridogan U, Basdogan I (2015) A review of active vibration and noise suppression of plate-like structures with piezoelectric transducers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26:1455–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Song B, Wang P, Huang S (2015) Multi-fidelity information fusion based on prediction of kriging. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:1267–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan HG, Yang LJ, Tian YC, Wang ZW (2020) Design of metastructures with quasi-zero dynamic stiffness for vibration isolation. Compos Struct 243:112244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein A, Lazzara D, Princen N, Willcox K (2020) Multifidelity data fusion: application to blended-wing-body multidisciplinary analysis under uncertainty. AIAA J 58:889–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Z, Zimmerman R, Görtz S (2012) Alternative cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling. AIAA J 50:1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AKS, Abdel-Malek HL, Mohamed AS, Elqenawy AE (2017) Space mapping surrogate-based microwave circuit design centering using a new statistical technique. Int J Numer Model El 30:e2108

  • Hu J, Zhou Q, McKeand A, Xie T, Choi SK (2021) A model validation framework based on parameter calibration under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63(2):645–660

  • Ibrahim RA (2008) Recent advances in nonlinear passive vibration isolators. J Sound Vib 314:371–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A (2018) Implicit space mapping for variable-fidelity EM-driven design of compact circuits. IEEE Microw Wirel Co 28:275–277

  • Le Gratiet L, Garnier J (2014) Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity. Int J Uncertain Quantif 4:365–386

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Sheng P (2016) Acoustic metamaterials: from local resonances to broad horizons. Sci Adv 2:e1501595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov VP, Bazinenkov AM (2017) Active vibration isolation platform on base of magnetorheological elastomers. J Magn Magn Mater 431:266–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscatelli M, Ardito R, Driemeier L, Comi C (2019) Band-gap structure in two- and three-dimensional cellular locally resonant materials. J Sound Vib 454:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2017) Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:1029–1050

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini R, Iemma U, Leotardi C, Campana EF, Diez M (2016) Multi-fidelity adaptive global metamodel of expensive computer simulations, 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). Publishing, pp 4444–4451

  • Plummer J (2015) Architectured materials snapping metamaterials. Nat Mater 14:962–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian J, Yi J, Cheng Y, Liu J, Zhou Q (2020a) A sequential constraints updating approach for kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design problem. Eng Comput 36:993–1009

  • Qian J, Yi J, Zhang J, Cheng Y, Liu J (2020b) An entropy weight-based lower confidence bounding optimization approach for engineering product design. Appl Sci 10(10):3554

  • Rafsanjani A, Akbarzadeh A, Pasini D (2015) Snapping mechanical metamaterials under tension. Adv Mater 27:5931–5935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivin EI (2003) Passive vibration isolation. ASME Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rokita T, Friedmann PP (2018) Multifidelity cokriging for high-dimensional output functions with application to hypersonic airloads computation. AIAA J 56:3060–3070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan S, Kang SH, Raney JR, Wang P, Fang L, Candido F, Lewis JA, Bertoldi K (2015) Multistable architected materials for trapping elastic strain energy. Adv Mater 27:4296–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic AM, Jovanovic MM, Lukic NS, Zoric ND, Stupar SN, Ilic SS (2016) Experimental studies on active vibration control of smart plate using a modified PID controller with optimal orientation of piezoelectric actuator. J Vib Control 22:2619–2631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon JC (1979) Vibration isolation: use and characterization. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1245–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Li G, Stone M, Li Q (2010) A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials. Comput Mater Sci 49:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Li G, Li Q (2012) Variable fidelity design based surrogate and artificial bee colony algorithm for sheet metal forming process. Finite Elem Anal Des 59:76–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Song B, Wang P, Dong H, Chen X (2019) Shape optimization of underwater wings with a new multi-fidelity bi-level strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61:319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman UT, Hassan A-KS, Owis FM, Mohamed AS (2019) Blade shape optimization of an aircraft propeller using space mapping surrogates. Adv Mech Eng 11:1687814019865071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan G, Zou HX, Wang S, Zhao LC, Gao QH, Tan T, Zhang WM (2020) Large stroke quasi-zero stiffness vibration isolator using three-link mechanism. J Sound Vib 478:115344

  • Zhonghua H, Chenzhou X, ZHANG L, ZHANG Y, ZHANG K, Wenping S (2020) Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization using variable-fidelity surrogate models and multilevel computational grids. Chin J Aeronaut 33:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Jiang P, Shao X, Hu J, Cao L, Wan L (2017) A variable fidelity information fusion method based on radial basis function. Adv Eng Inform 32:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Cao L, Zhou H, Huang X (2018) Prediction of angular distortion in the fiber laser keyhole welding process based on a variable-fidelity approximation modeling approach. J Intell Manuf 29:719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Wu Y, Guo Z, Hu J, Jin P (2020) A generalized hierarchical co-Kriging model for multi-fidelity data fusion. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:1885–1904

Download references

Funding

This work has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Number: 2018YFB1106705) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 51805179 and No. 51721092.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinlan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

The code could be downloaded from the website: https://pan.baidu.com/s/17qOCO_ny0HbjyXJlnGifww by using the code deeu.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Palaniappan Ramu

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(PDF 732 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, J., Cheng, Y., Zhang, A. et al. Optimization design of metamaterial vibration isolator with honeycomb structure based on multi-fidelity surrogate model. Struct Multidisc Optim 64, 423–439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02891-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02891-6

Keywords

Navigation