Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Targeting the acceleration-time response of vehicle structures under crash impact using equivalent dynamic loads

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work introduces an optimization procedure derived from the targeting force-displacement response (TFDR) method to improve the crashworthiness of full-size vehicle structures. The proposed method aims at targeting the vehicle’s acceleration-time response (ATR) under a crash event using topometry (thickness) optimization. In contrast to the original TFDR method, the proposed targeting method uses a moving coordinate system (MCS) that allows addressing fully dynamic crash models with initial velocity. By setting a proper target ATR curve, the proposed method can improve several crashworthiness indicators including specific energy absorption, maximum deceleration, dynamic penetration, and crash load efficiency. The result of the topometry optimization could be a guideline for the further design. In the proposed method, the nonlinear optimization problem is discretized into a series of analytical subproblems using equivalent dynamic load (EDL). In each iteration, the dynamic response from an explicit dynamic finite element (FE) analysis is utilized to define and solve a subproblem. To demonstrate the proposed iterative method, the baseline FE model of a Dodge Grand Caravan vehicle, obtained from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) website, is optimized. The results show the effectiveness of the algorithm finding the element thickness distribution to make the acceleration-time response of the vehicle’s center of gravity (VCG) gradually approach a target curve. The proposed EDL algorithm finds a converged solution using less than 15 crash simulations. This makes it possible to solve problems involving full-size vehicle FE models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avalle M, Chiandussi G, Belingardi G (2002) Design optimization by response surface methodology: application to crashworthiness design of vehicle structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24(4):325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao YK, Sun F, Yu HY (2010) Crashworthiness optimization of car body based on kriging surrogate model. Automot Eng 32(1):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Han X, An W, Tovar A (2019) Targeting the force-displacement response of thin-walled structures subjected to crushing load using curve decomposition and topometry optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59:2303–2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02197-8

  • Hong E, You B, Kim C, Park G (2010) Optimization of flexible components of multibody systems via equivalent static loads. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40(1–6):549–562

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim (13):455–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147

  • Jung DY, Gea HC (2004) Topology optimization of nonlinear structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 40(11):1417–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtaran H, Eskandarian A, Marzougui D, Bedewi NE (2002) Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations. Comput Mech 29(4–5):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan F, Zhong Y, Zhuang L, Chen J, Fang Z (2010) Optimization of energy-absorbing members in front-end of car body based on adaptive response surface method. Automot Eng

  • Levia JP (2004) Topometry optimization: a new capability to perform element by element sizing optimization of structures. AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference

  • Liu K, Wu T, Detwiler D, Panchal J, Tovar A (2019) Design for crashworthiness of categorical multimaterial structures using cluster analysis and Bayesian optimization. ASME J Mech Des, Spec Issue Mach Learn 141(12):121701

    Google Scholar 

  • Marklund PO, Nilsson L (2001) Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21(5):383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozumder C, Tovar A, Renaud JE (2010) Topometry optimization of plastically deformable sheet-metal structure with prescribed force-displacement response for controlled energy absorption. 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference 18th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 12th

  • Mozumder C, Tovar A, Renaud JE (2012) Topometry optimization for crashworthiness design using hybrid cellular automata. Int J Veh Des 60(1,2):100–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park GJ (2011) Technical overview of the equivalent static loads method for non-linear static response structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(3):319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park GJ, Kang BS (2003) Validation of a structural optimization algorithm transforming dynamic loads into equivalent static loads. J Optim Theory Applic 118(1):191–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Redhe M, Forsberg J, Jansson T, Marklund PO, Nilsson L (2002) Using the response surface methodology and the d-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24(3):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Wan X, Chen Y (2017) Design optimization of thin-walled circular tubular structures with graded thickness under later impact loading. Int J Automot Technol 18(3):439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhao L, Zhang Q, Wei X (2015) Geometry parameter optimization method for automobile energy-absorbing box, 2015 4th. International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT), Harbin, China, pp. 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSNT.2015.7490755.

  • Zhang X, Zhang H, Wang Z (2016) Bending collapse of square tubes with variable thickness. Int J Mech Sci 106:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

The LS-DYNA input deck files for the finite element model of the Dodge Grand Caravan vehicle can be downloaded from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) website (https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-simulation-vehicle-models). The MATLAB code to read the LS-DYNA output deck files and apply the proposed EDL optimization approach can be made available upon request to the authors.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Palaniappan Ramu

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, W., Han, X., Tovar, A. et al. Targeting the acceleration-time response of vehicle structures under crash impact using equivalent dynamic loads. Struct Multidisc Optim 64, 599–612 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02845-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02845-y

Keywords

Navigation