Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing component solution spaces for systems design

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 12 May 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Systems design is concerned with breaking down large and complex problems on the system level into smaller and simpler problems on a component level. This can be accomplished by decomposing quantitative system requirements into requirements for each component. These new requirements can be expressed by component solution spaces, i.e., regions of permissible component design variables. They serve as design goals for component development and support decisions regarding component design. Component solution spaces should be chosen such that components can be designed independently of each other. This is the case when satisfying all component requirements implies satisfying the higher level system requirements. In addition, component solution spaces should be as large as possible to provide maximum flexibility for component design, and to encompass uncertainty. Motivated by related work, their shapes can be predefined as boxes, i.e., multi-dimensional intervals, which enables a simple visual and numerical representation. Unfortunately, this will make solution spaces small and associated requirements unnecessarily restrictive. In a new approach, the shapes of component solution spaces are also optimized to further enlarge their size. This is accomplished by decomposing the system performance function as a sum of predefined component performance functions and optimizing their individual contribution. For both the old and new approach, optimization schemes are presented which focus on linear system performance functions. Their effectiveness is demonstrated for a crash design problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 12 May 2020

    The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes introduced during the publishing process.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the SPP 1886 “Polymorphic uncertainty modeling for the numerical design of structures” of the German Research Foundation, DFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Daub.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by:Responsible Editor: Somanath Nagendra

Replication of results

All results can be reproduced by using the equations and values presented in this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daub, M., Duddeck, F. & Zimmermann, M. Optimizing component solution spaces for systems design. Struct Multidisc Optim 61, 2097–2109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02456-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02456-8

Keywords

Navigation