Skip to main content
Log in

Principal component analysis-based predictive modeling and optimization of permanent deformation in asphalt pavement: elimination of correlated inputs and extrapolation in modeling

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permanent deformation in asphalt pavement is a function of material properties, loading, environmental conditions, and structural design (e.g., thickness of pavement layers). Because of the large number of effective variables and their nonlinear interrelationships, it is not easy to develop a predictive model for permanent deformation. In this study, a laboratory database containing accumulated strain values (output) and material properties (inputs) from several asphalt pavements has been used to develop a predictive model for permanent deformation. We first show that the inputs are highly correlated, then principal component analysis (PCA) is used to compute a set of orthogonal pseudo-inputs. Two predictive models based on the pseudo-inputs were developed using linear regression analysis and artificial neural networks (ANN) and are compared using statistical analysis. Extrapolation using empirical predictive models is highly risky and discouraged by experienced practitioners, so to guard against extrapolation, a method is developed to determine an input hyper-space. The above-developed model, along with an n-dimensional hyper-space, provides sufficient information for supporting an optimization algorithm for finding the minimum accumulated strain. An asphalt pavement design with accumulated strain value of 1772 micro-strain (0.02 in. in a 10-in.-thick asphalt pavement layer) is obtained by solving the optimization problem and the design parameters meet flexible pavement design specifications. The proposed framework is able to generate accurate predictive models when the original inputs are highly correlated and able to map to an optimal point in the fitted input space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTOTP 79-13 (2013) AASHTO TP 79-13 Determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the Asphalt Mixtures Performance Tester. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, pp 1–19

  • Apeagyei AK (2011) Rutting as a function of dynamic modulus and gradation. Amer Soc Civ Eng 23 (9):1302–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • ARA Inc. ECD (2004) Guide for mechanistic–empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Final Rep. NCHRP Project 1-37A

  • Arabali P, Sakhaeifar MS, Freeman TJ, Wilson BT, Borowiec JD (2017) Decision-making guideline for preservation of flexible pavements in general aviation airport management. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Part B: Pavements 143(2):04017,006

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslani M, Asla RN, Oftadehb R, Panahic MS (2010) A novel hybrid simplex-genetic algorithm for the optimum design of truss structures. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering, vol. 2

  • Aslani M, Ghasemi P, Gandomi AH (2018) Constrained mean-variance mapping optimization for truss optimization problems. Struct Des Tall Special Build 27(6):e1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashin A, Masad E, Kutay ME, Buttlar W, Kim YR, Marasteanu M, Kim YR, Schwartz CW, Carvalho RL (2012) Applications of advanced models to understand behavior and performance of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research E-Circular (E-C161)

  • Birgisson B, Roque R, Kim J, Pham LV (2004) The Use of Complex Modulus To Characterize Performance of Asphalt Mixtures and Pavements in Florida. Tech. Rep. September 2004, florida department of transportation florida department of transportation

  • Carpenter W, Barthelemy JF (1993) A comparison of polynomial approximations and artificial neural nets as response surfaces. Struct Multidiscip Optim 5(3):166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B, Titterington D (1994) Neural networks: a review from a statistical perspective

  • Cominsky RJ, Huber GA, Kennedy TW, Anderson M (1994) The superpave mix design manual for new construction and overlays. SHRP-a-407. Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Devore JL (2011) Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the. Sciences Cengage learning

  • Ebrahimi M, ShafieiBavani E, Wong RK, Fong S, Fiaidhi J (2017) An adaptive meta-heuristic search for the internet of things. Futur Gener Comput Syst 76:486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlich I, Venayagamoorthy GK, Worawat N (2010) A mean-variance optimization algorithm. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2010.5586027

  • Fodor IK (2002) A Survey of Dimension Reduction Techniques. Tech. rep., U.S Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Energy

  • García-Segura T, Yepes V, Frangopol DM (2017) Multi-objective design of post-tensioned concrete road bridges using artificial neural networks. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(1):139–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi P, Aslani M, Rollins DK, Williams R, Schaefer VR (2018) Modeling rutting susceptibility of asphalt pavement using principal component pseudo inputs in regression and neural networks. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology

  • Granato D, Santos JS, Escher GB, Ferreira BL, Maggio RM (2017) Use of principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) for multivariate association between bioactive compounds and functional properties in foods: a critical perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology

  • Happ C, Greven S (2018) Multivariate functional principal component analysis for data observed on different (dimensional) domains. J Am Stat Assoc 113(522):649–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1273115

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW, et al. (2014) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, vol 4. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, Second Edition. Encycl Stat Behav Sci 30(3):487

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Juang CH, Chen CJ (1999) CPT-based liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 14(3):221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaloush K, Witczak M, Sullivan BW (2003) Simple performance test for permanent deformation evaluation of asphalt mixtures. Sixth International RILEM Symposium on Performance Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials, pp 498–505

  • Kartam N (1994) Neural netwroks in civil engineering: systems and application. J Comput Civ Eng 8(2):149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutner MH, Nachtsheim C, Neter J (2004) Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvasnak A, Robinette C, Williams R (2007) A statistical development of a flow number predictive equation for the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide.CD-ROM. In: Transportation Research Board. D. Transportation Research Board, Washington (ed), vol 3. Washington, DC, pp 1–18

  • Lever J, Krzywinski M, Altman N (2017) Points of significance: principal component analysis

  • Liew K, Tan H, Ray T, Tan M (2004) Optimal process design of sheet metal forming for minimum springback via an integrated neural network evolutionary algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(3):284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Jang YS, Chang HS, Park JC, Lee J (2018) Role of multi-response principal component analysis in reliability-based robust design optimization: an application to commercial vehicle design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(2):785–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1908-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardero AC, Piqueras VY, Vidosa FG (2012) Automatic design of concrete vaults using iterated local search and extreme value estimation, vol 9. Argentinean Association of Computational Mechanics, Brazilian Association of Computational Mechanics, Mexican Association of Numerical Methods in Engineering and Applied Sciences

  • Malik MR, Isaac BJ, Coussement A, Smith PJ, Parente A (2018) Principal component analysis coupled with nonlinear regression for chemistry reduction. Combust Flame 187:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti-Vargas JR, Ferri FJ, Yepes V (2013) Prediction of the transfer length of prestressing strands with neural networks. Comput Concr 12(2):187–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2012) Matheworks, T., 2012. Matlab 2012b

  • May R, Dandy G, Maier H (2011) Review of input variable selection methods for artificial neural networks. In: Artificial neural networks-methodological advances and biomedical applications. intech

  • Nicholas PE, Padmanaban K, Vasudevan D, Ramachandran T (2015) Stacking sequence optimization of horizontal axis wind turbine blade using fea, ann and ga. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(4):791–801

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Choi K, Du L (2009) Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a gaussian copula. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paya-Zaforteza I, Yepes V, González-Vidosa F, Hospitaler A (2010) On the weibull cost estimation of building frames designed by simulated annealing. Meccanica 45(5):693–704

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pellinen T, Witczak M (2002) Use of stiffness of Hot-Mix asphalt as a simple performance test. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1789(02):80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahami H, Kaveh A, Aslani M, Najian Asl R (2011) A hybrid modified genetic-nelder mead simplex algorithm for large-scale truss optimization. Iran Univ Sci Technol 1(1):29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L, Liu H (2009) Cross-validation. In: Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, pp 532–538

  • Rodezno M, Kaloush K, Corrigan M (2010) Development of a Flow Number Predictive Model. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2181(2181):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins KD Sr (2015) A One-dimensional PCA approach for classifying imbalanced data. J Comput Sci Syst Biol 8(1):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins DK, Zhai D, Joe AL, Guidarelli JW, Murarka A, Gonzalez R (2006) A novel data mining method to identify assay-specific signatures in functional genomic studies. BMC Bioinforma 7:377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda JL, Erlich I (2015) Testing MVMO on learning-based real-parameter single objective benchmark optimization problems. 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2015 - Proceedings, pp 1025–1032

  • Su CT, Tong LI (1997) Multi-response robust design by principal component analysis. Total Qual Manag 8(6):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talatahari S, Gandomi AH, Yang XS, Deb S (2015) Optimum design of frame structures using the eagle strategy with differential evolution. Eng Struct 91:16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timm D, West R, Priest A, Powell B, Selvaraj I, Zhang J, Brown R (2006) Phase ii ncat test track results. NCAT Report 6(05)

  • Todd MJ, Yıldırım EA (2007) On khachiyan’s algorithm for the computation of minimum-volume enclosing ellipsoids. Discret Appl Math 155(13):1731–1744

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Witzcak MW (2002) Simple performance test for superpave mix design. Transportation Research Board, vol 465

  • Xiong F, Wang D, Zhang S, Cai K, Wang S, Lu F (2017) Lightweight optimization of the side structure of automobile body using combined grey relational and principal component analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong F, Wang D, Zhang S, Cai K, Wang S, Lu F (2018) Lightweight optimization of the side structure of automobile body using combined grey relational and principal component analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi S, Lai Z, He Z, Cheung YM, Liu Y (2017) Joint sparse principal component analysis. Pattern Recogn 61:524–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Yang J, Kim YR (2015) Characterization of mechanical behavior of asphalt mixtures under partial triaxial compression test. Constr Build Mater 79:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parnian Ghasemi.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Qing Li

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, P., Aslani, M., Rollins, D.K. et al. Principal component analysis-based predictive modeling and optimization of permanent deformation in asphalt pavement: elimination of correlated inputs and extrapolation in modeling. Struct Multidisc Optim 59, 1335–1353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2133-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2133-x

Keywords

Navigation