Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An efficient RBDO process using adaptive initial point updating method based on sigmoid function

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Using Kriging model in the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) process can reduce the computational cost effectively. However, the constraints in practical problems are often highly nonlinear and black box functions, and the cost of evaluations at design points is very high, such as the finite element analysis (FEA). So building accurate Kriging models will consume a huge amount of computing resources. Moreover, complex constraint functions will lead to the local minimum in the design space, which makes it difficult to get the global optimum. To cope with this problem, an adaptive sampling method based RBDO process (AS-RBDO) is proposed by introducing two new sampling criterions. The first criterion is built based on the support vector machine (SVM) and the sigmoid function. And the second criterion is built based on the improvement of the constraint boundary sampling (CBS) method. With the use of new strategies, AS-RBDO can not only guide the optimization to the global optimal direction, but also update the Kriging model only in the local range that has the greatest impact on the results of RBDO. Thus the unnecessary sampling and evaluations can be avoided effectively. Several examples are selected to test the computation capability of the proposed method. The results show that AS-RBDO can effectively improve the efficiency of the RBDO process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal H, Mozumder CK, Renaud JE, Watson LT (2007) An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(3):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basudhar A, Dribusch C, Lacaze S, Missoum S (2012) Constrained efficient global optimization with support vector machines. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(2):201–221

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bect J, Ginsbourger D, Li L, Picheny V, Vazquez E (2012) Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure. Stat Comput 22(3):773–793

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Swiler LP, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichon BJ, McFarland JM, Mahadevan S (2011) Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(10):1386–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourinet J-M, Deheeger F, Lemaire M (2011) Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines. Struct Saf 33(6):343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadini F, Santos F, Zio E (2014) An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 131:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Li P (2013a) An optimal shifting vector approach for efficient probabilistic design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(6):905–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Su L, Li P (2013b) An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 117:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Li X, Li P (2014) A local adaptive sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(3):401–416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Peng S, Li X et al (2015) An important boundary sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(1):55–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng G, Xu L, Jiang L (2006) A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based structural optimization. Comput Struct 84(21):1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching J, Hsu W-C (2008) Transforming reliability limit-state constraints into deterministic limit-state constraints. Struct Saf 30(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho TM, Lee BC (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using convex linearization and sequential optimization and reliability assessment method. Struct Saf 33(1):42–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Du X (2008a) Saddlepoint approximation for sequential optimization and reliability analysis. J Mech Des 130(1):011011-011011-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X (2008b) Unified uncertainty analysis by the first order reliability method. J Mech Des 130(9):091401-091401-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des 126(2):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M, Relun N (2013) A combined importance sampling and kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao P, Wang B, Li G, Meng Z, Wang L (2015) Hybrid framework for reliability-based design optimization of imperfect stiffened shells. AIAA J 53(10):2878–2889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao P, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang B, Wu H (2017a) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hao P, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang B, Li G, Wang L (2017b) An efficient adaptive-loop method for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 324:689–711

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms, Second edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y-C, Chan K-Y (2010) A modified efficient global optimization algorithm for maximal reliability in a probabilistic constrained space. J Mech Des 132(6):061002-061002-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H-Z, Zhang X, Liu Y, Meng D, Wang Z (2012) Enhanced sequential optimization and reliability assessment for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 26(7):2039–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyeon Ju B, Chai Lee B (2008) Reliability-based design optimization using a moment method and a kriging metamodel. Eng Optim 40(5):421–438

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kharmanda G, Mohamed A, Lemaire M (2002) Efficient reliability-based design optimization using a hybrid space with application to finite element analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24(3):233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirjner-Neto C, Polak E, Kiureghian AD (1998) An outer approximations approach to reliability-based optimal design of structures. J Optim Theory Appl 98(1):1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kogiso N, Yang Y-S, Kim B-J, Lee J-O (2012) Modified single-loop-single-vector method for efficient reliability-based design optimization. J Adv Mech Des Syst 6(7):1206–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TH, Jung JJ (2008) A sampling technique enhancing accuracy and efficiency of metamodel-based RBDO: constraint boundary sampling. Comput Struct 86(13):1463–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi K, Zhao L (2011) Sampling-based RBDO using the stochastic sensitivity analysis and dynamic kriging method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(3):299–317

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Wu T, Badiru A, Hu M, Soni S (2013) A single-loop deterministic method for reliability-based design optimization. Eng Optim 45(4):435–458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Qiu H, Chen Z, Gao L, Shao X (2016) A local kriging approximation method using MPP for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 162:102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H-T, Lin C-J, Weng RC (2007) A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Mach Learn 68(3):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Zhou H, Li G, Yang D (2016) A decoupled approach for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 175(C):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picheny V, Ginsbourger D, Roustant O, Haftka RT, Kim N-H (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region. J Mech Des 132(7):071008-071008-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt J (1999) Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In Advances in large margin classifiers 10(3):61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius C, Craig K, Haarhoff L (2004) Kriging response surfaces as an alternative implementation of RBDO in continuous casting design optimization. Aiaa/issmo Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference 139:156–162

  • Roussouly N, Petitjean F, Salaun M (2013) A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis. Probabilist Eng Mech 32:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royset JO, Der Kiureghian A, Polak E (2001) Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73(3):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan S, Wang GG (2008) Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(8):1218–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smola AJ, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14(3):199–222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Choi KK, Lee I, Zhao L, Lamb D (2013) Adaptive virtual support vector machine for reliability analysis of high-dimensional problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(4):479–491

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens JA, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (2001) Design potential method for robust system parameter design. AIAA J 39(4):667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdebenito MA, Schuëller GI (2010) A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(5):645–663

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yu X, Du X (2015) Improved reliability-based optimization with support vector machines and its application in aircraft wing design. Math Probl Eng 501:569016

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y-T, Millwater H, Cruse T (1990) Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance functions. AIAA J 28(9):1663–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao W, Chen X, Huang Y, van Tooren M (2013) An enhanced unified uncertainty analysis approach based on first order reliability method with single-level optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 116:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi P, Cheng G, Jiang L (2008) A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Struct Saf 30(2):91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Han X, Jiang C, Liu J, Li Q (2017) Time-variant reliability analysis through response surface method. J Mech Des 139(4):041404–041404–12

  • Zhao Y-G, Ono T (1999) A general procedure for first/second-order reliabilitymethod (form/sorm). Struct Saf 21(2):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Choi K, Lee I, Gorsich D (2013) Conservative surrogate model using weighted kriging variance for sampling-based RBDO. J Mech Des 135(9):091003-091003-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Yue Z, Liu Y, Gao Z, Zhang Y (2015) An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and kriging metamodel. Appl Math Model 39(7):1853–1866

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang X, Pan R (2012) A sequential sampling strategy to improve reliability-based design optimization with implicit constraint functions. J Mech Des 134(2):021002-021002-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou T, Mahadevan S, Mourelatos ZP (2003) Reliability analysis with adaptive response surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 1483

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51575205) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61672247). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yizhong Wu.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Jianbin Du

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Wu, Y., Wang, B. et al. An efficient RBDO process using adaptive initial point updating method based on sigmoid function. Struct Multidisc Optim 58, 2583–2599 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2038-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2038-8

Keywords

Navigation