Skip to main content
Log in

A theoretical optimization method for drawbead restraining forces in automotive panel forming based on plastic flow principles

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at improving the optimization efficiency, a theoretical optimization method for drawbead is proposed based on plastic flow principles. Essentially different from the existing common optimization methods which are on the basis of mathematics or statistics, this method, which can accurately reflect the relationship between the forming quality and the drawbead restraining force from the perspective of plastic flow theory, is a professional optimization method with higher efficiency. Plastic flow principles are first established to determine the influence degree of the drawbead restraining force to the forming quality. Then an evaluation model of the forming quality near a drawbead segment can be established based on the plastic flow principles to qualify the forming quality near the drawbead segment. Finally, a theoretical optimization method for drawbead is proposed based on the evaluation model, according to which the restraining force of each drawbead segment can be directly adjusted. By using the method, the optimal drawbead scheme in automotive panel forming can be obtained with only 3–5 iterations. The efficiency and accuracy of the optimization method are verified by a numerical example of a fender panel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao Y, Xu W, Liu G, Lin Z (2001) Optimization design variable blankholder force in sheet metal forming. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 37(2):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitkopf P, Naceur H, Rassineux A, Villon P (2005) Moving least squares response surface approximation: formulation and metal forming applications. Comput Struct 83(17–18):1411–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du T, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Li Z (2007) Fast FE analysis system for sheet metal stamping—FASTAMP. J Mater Process Tech 187-188:402–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Batoz J, Naceur H, Mercier F, Barlet O (2000) Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach. Comput Struct 78(1):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RA (1948) Theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 193:281-297

  • Huh H, Kim SH (2001) Optimum process design in sheet-metal forming with finite element analysis. J Eng Mater-Tehnol ASME 123:476–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakumeit J, Herdy M, Nitsche M (2005) Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(6):498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama S, Huang S, Yamazaki K (2013) Optimization of variable blank holder force trajectory for springback reduction via sequential approximate optimization with radial basis function network. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama S, Saikyo M, Kawamoto K, Yamamichi K (2015) Multi-objective optimization of blank shape for deep drawing with variable blank holder force via sequential approximate optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(5):1001–1012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liew KM, Tan H, Ray T, Tan MJ (2004) Optimal process design of sheet metal forming for minimum springback via an integrated neural network evolutionary algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(3):284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Lin Z, Bao Y (2002) Optimization design of drawbead in drawing tools of autobody cover panel. J Eng Mater Technol 124(2):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Liu WJ, Ruan F, Qiu HY (2007) Parameters’ automated optimization in sheet metal forming process. J Mater Process Tech 187–188:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naceur H, Guo Y, Batoz J, Knopf-Lenoir C (2001) Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 43(10):2407–2434

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Naceur H, Ben-Elechi S, Batoz JL, Knopf-Lenoir C (2008) Response surface methodology for the rapid design of aluminum sheet metal forming parameters. Mater Design 29:781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohata T, Nakamura Y, Katayama T, Nakamachi E, Nakano K (1996) Development of optimum process design system by numerical simulation. J Mater Process Technol 60:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderc M, Friebed H and Galanulisd K (2008) Validation and optimization of numerical simulation by optical measurements of tools and parts. http://www.gom.com/fileadmin/user_upload/industries/fea-comparison.pdf. Accessed 16–18 June 2008

  • Shi X, Chen J, Peng Y et al (2004) A new approach of die shape optimization for sheet metal forming processes[J]. J Mater Process Technol 152(1):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnowski W, Marczewska I, Marczewski A (2002) Sensitivity based optimization of sheet metal forming tools. J Mater Process Technol 124:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun GY, Li GY, Gong ZH, Cui XY, Yang XJ, Li Q (2010) Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming. Mater Design 31:1917–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Li G, Li Q (2012) Variable fidelity design based surrogate and artificial bee colony algorithm for sheet metal forming process. Finite Elem Anal Des 59:76–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang BT, Sun JX, Zhao Z, Chen J, Ruan XY (2006) Optimization of drawbead design in sheet forming using one step finite element method coupled with response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 31:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Li E, Li G, Zhong Z (2008a) Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by the use of space mapping based metamodeling method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 39:642–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Li E, Li G (2008b) Optimization of drawbead design in sheet metal forming based on intelligent sampling by using response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 206(1):45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Li E, Li G (2009) The least square support vector regression coupled with parallel sampling scheme metamodeling technique and application in sheet forming optimization. Mater Des 30:1468–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Li E, Li G (2010) Parallel boundary and best neighbor searching sampling algorithm for drawbead design optimization in sheet metal forming. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):309–324

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Ye F, Chen L, Li E (2017) Sheet metal forming optimization by using surrogate modeling techniques. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 30(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei DL, Cui ZS, Chen J (2008) Optimization and tolerance prediction of sheet metal forming process using response surface model. Comput Mater Sci 42:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Liu Y, Zhang Z (2017) A new method for automatic optimization of drawbead geometry in the sheet metal forming process based on an iterative learning control model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5):1845–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibing Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Liu, Y. & Zhang, Z. A theoretical optimization method for drawbead restraining forces in automotive panel forming based on plastic flow principles. Struct Multidisc Optim 57, 267–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1752-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1752-y

Keywords

Navigation