Skip to main content
Log in

S-Lay pipe laying optimization using specialized PSO method

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper deals with the optimization of the S-Lay submarine pipe-laying. The considered laying model is based on a nonlinear elastic beam model with elastic contact interactions with rigid structures of roller supports and the seabed, solved in the Abaqus software. The optimization problem is formulated so as to determine the main parameters of pipe-laying. In order to maximize the efficiency of the optimization procedure, a specialized Particle Swarm Optimization variant is developed. The introduced δ-PSO employs an additional displacement of agent positions, through which the optimization is directed towards solutions based on offshore engineering practice. Two different cases of submarine pipe laying were used for testing. In these tests, the specialized PSO was compared to standard PSO and Mesh Adaptive Direct Search, which it both outperformed. The δ-PSO specialization is easy to implement in PSO or other swarm intelligence methods, and hopefully can provide similar improvements in other applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson MA, Audet C, Dennis JE Jr, Digabel SL (2009) Orthomads: a deterministic mads instance with orthogonal directions. SIAM J Optim 20(2):948–966

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Audet C, Dennis JE Jr (2006) Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J Optim 17(1):188– 217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Audet C, Dennis JE Jr (2009) A progressive barrier for derivative-free nonlinear programming. SIAM J Optim 20(1):445–472

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Audet C, Le Digabel S, Tribes C (2009) Nomad user guide. Rapport technique

  • Bernitsas MM, Vlahopoulos N (1990) Three-dimensional nonlinear statics of pipelaying using condensation in an incremental finite element algorithm. Comput Struct 35(3):195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhavikatti S, Akram P, Ravichandran T (1986) Minimization of maximum moment in offshore pipeline during installation. Appl Ocean Res 8(3):164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton D, Kennedy J (2007) Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization. In: 2007 IEEE swarm intelligence symposium, IEEE, pp 120–127

  • British Standard B (1993) BS 8010: code of practice for pipelines

  • Callegari M, Carini C, Lenci S, Torselletti E, Vitali L (2003) Dynamic models of marine pipelines for installation in deep and ultra-deep waters: analytical and numerical approaches. In: Proceedings of the 5th national congress of the italian association of mechanics (AIMETA 2003), Ferrara, Italy

  • Clauss G, Weede H, Saroukh A (1991) Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of marine pipelines during laying. Ship Technology Research 38

  • Dassault Systèmes (2011a) Abaqus 6.11 Theory Manual. Dassault Systèmes

  • Dassault Systèmes (2011b) Analysis user’s manual, Volume II: Analysis. Dassault Systèmes

  • Dassault Systèmes (2011c) Analysis user’s manual, Volume IV: Elements. Dassault Systèmes

  • DNV OS (2012) Submarine Pipeline Systems. Tech. rep., DNV-OS-F101

  • Fourie P, Groenwold AA (2002) The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(4):259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaggiotti F (2011) Deep water pipe laying: from mooring-based station keeping to dynamic positioning. PhD thesis

  • Hong W (2010) Simulation of TDP Dynamics during S-laying of Subsea Pipelines. Master’s thesis

  • Hvidsten E (2009) Pipelaying on uneven seabed. Master’s thesis, University of Stavanger

  • Ivić S (2015) Sensitivity analysis of s-lay pipe-laying configuration. Int J Appl Eng Res 10(22):43,250–43,255

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivić S, Čanađija M, Družeta S (2014) Static structural analysis of s-lay pipe laying with a tensioner model based on the frictional contact. Engineering Review 34(3):223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen GA (2010) Offshore pipelaying dynamics. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  • Kalivarapu VK, Winer EH (2009) Asynchronous parallelization of particle swarm optimization through digital pheromone sharing. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(3):263–281

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karabaić D (2012) Optimizacija konfiguracije S-Lay postupka polaganja podmorskih cjevovoda. PhD thesis, Tehnički fakultet, Sveučilište u Rijeci

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, 1995. Proceedings, IEEE, vol 4, pp 1942–1948

  • Kitayama S, Arakawa M, Yamazaki K (2006) Penalty function approach for the mixed discrete nonlinear problems by particle swarm optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 32(3):191– 202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lagaros ND (2014) A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(6):1047–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhelle M (2011) Pipelines for development at deep water fields. Master’s thesis, University of Stavanger

  • Lawinscky da Silva DM, de Lima MHA, Jacob BP (2009) Numerical model for the simulation of the pipeline-Laybarge interaction in pipelaying procedures. International Journal of Modeling and Simulation for the Petroleum Industry 3(1)

  • Le Digabel S (2011) Algorithm 909: nomad: nonlinear optimization with the mads algorithm. ACM ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 37(4):44

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lenci S, Callegari M (2005) Simple analytical models for the J-lay problem. Acta Mech 178(1-2):23–39

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levy AB (2009) The basics of practical optimization. SIAM

  • Li Z, Chen Y, Gong S, Jin W (2010) Configuration of Submarine Pipeline for Deepwater S-lay Technique. In: Proceedings of the twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, June 20–25, 2010

  • Lu B, Ou H, Long H (2011) Die shape optimisation for net-shape accuracy in metal forming using direct search and localised response surface methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(4):529–545. doi:10.1007/s00158-011-0635-x

  • Malahy R Jr (1985) Nonlinear finite element method for the analysis of the offshore pipelaying problem. PhD thesis, Rice University Houston, TX (USA)

  • Menkham S (2010) A comprehensive articulated stinger optimization study. PhD thesis, Asian Institute of Technology

  • Perinet D, Frazer I, et al. (2008) Strain criteria for deep water pipe laying operations. In: Proceedings of the 40th offshore technology conference. OTC, vol 19329

  • Rienstra S (1987) Analytical approximations for offshore pipelaying problems. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on industrial and applied mathematics, ICIAM, vol 87, pp 99–108

  • Shan S, Wang GG (2010) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):219–241

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: The 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings, 1998. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, IEEE, pp 69–73

  • Simmonds D (1985) Some problems involving umbilicals, cables and pipes. Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies 12:323–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torczon V (1997) On the convergence of pattern search algorithms. SIAM J Optim 7(1):1–25

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Veritas DN, Veritas DN (1982) Rules for submarine pipeline systems 1981. Det Norske Veritas

  • Wedin H (2012) Limit state criteria theory for pipeline subsea installation processes. Master’s thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

  • Xie S, Liang X, Zhou H, Li J (2016) Crashworthiness optimisation of the front-end structure of the lead car of a high-speed train. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(2):339–347. doi:10.1007/s00158-015-1332-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeniay O (2005) Penalty function methods for constrained optimization with genetic algorithms. Mathematical and Computational Applications 10(1):45–56

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zavala GR, Nebro AJ, Luna F, Coello CAC (2014) A survey of multi-objective metaheuristics applied to structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(4):537–558

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu D, Cheung Y (1997) Optimization of buoyancy of an articulated stinger on submerged pipelines laid with a barge. Ocean En:301–311

  • Zinovieva TV (2011) Analysis of pipeline stress-strain state in seabed laying. Electronic Scientific Journal Oil and Gas Business:237–253

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siniša Družeta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivić, S., Družeta, S. & Hreljac, I. S-Lay pipe laying optimization using specialized PSO method. Struct Multidisc Optim 56, 297–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1665-9

Keywords

Navigation