Skip to main content

Design of the lower chassis of a monorail personal rapid transit (MPRT) car using the evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) method

Abstract

The Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO) procedure was applied to the design of the lower chassis of a monorail personal rapid transit (MPRT) car. As part of the early-stage development effort, ESO was used to identify a good topology of the lower chassis structure, which is effective in material usage, with lowly-stressed material removed. The procedure started with building a three-dimensional finite element model of the topology that occupies the design envelop, and lowly stressed elements were removed step by step during the ESO procedure. Multiple load cases concerning acceleration, deceleration, left turn, and right turn were analyzed separately, and a simple procedure dealing with multiple load cases was adopted. After 14 calculation increments, 80 % of the initial material was removed. The resulting topology reveals a reasonable frame structure with rounded outer corners, triangular cantilever supports, and Michell style beam structures, suitable as a starting reference for the structure design of a MPRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  • Abolbashari MH, Keshavarzmanesh S (2006) On various aspects of application of the evolutionary structural optimization method for 2D and 3D continuum structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 42:478–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generaating optimal topologies in structural design using homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2004) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie JA, Hoffman PS (2007) Viability of personal rapid transit in New Jersey. Final Report Presented to Governor Jon S. Corzine and the New Jersey Legislature

  • Cavazzuti M, Baldini A, Bertocchi E, Costi D, Torricelli E, Moruzzi P (2010) High performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization based approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu DN, Xie YM, Hira A, Steven GP (1996) Evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints. Finite Elem Anal Des 21:239–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cre I, Rupprecht S, Buhrmann S (2012) The development of local implementation scenarios for innovative urban transport concepts: the NICHES+ approach. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:1324–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eric S (1998) Monorail-back to the future. MIT Technol Rev 101:19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves JPC, Ambrosio JAC (2005) Road vehicle modeling requirements for optimization of ride and handling. Multibody Sys Dyn 13:3–23

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Cheng H, Tao Y (2012) Modified rejection ratio for multiple load cases evolutionary structural optimization. Int Conf Adv Comput Model Simul Procedia Eng 31:627–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving JH, Bernstein H, Olson CL, Buyan J (1978) Fundamentals of personal rapid transit. Lexington Books, Idaho Falls

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Lee D, Lee J, Han C, Hedrick K (2007) Integrated process for structural–topological configuration design of weight-reduced vehicle components. Finite Elem Anal Des 43:620–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton M (2013) The track to Suncheon: making APMs intelligent. Autom People Mov Transit Sys 2013:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard MJ, Bouazara M, Khadir L, Cai GQ (2011) Structural optimization algorithm for vehicle suspensions. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 35:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethian JA, Wiegmann A (2000) A structural boundary design via level-set and immersed interface methods. J Comput Phys 163:489–528

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Siu LK (2007) Innovative lightweight transit technologies for sustainable transportation. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 7:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Torstenfelt B, Klarbring A (2007) Conceptual optimal design of modular car product families using simultaneous size, shape and topology optimization. Finite Elem Anal Des 43:1050–1061

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Basu PK, Leiva JP (2004) Automobile body reinforcement by finite element optimization. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:879–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With Over 67 Million Passengers Passing through Each Year. the Airport at Heathrow is One of the World’s Busiest. http://www.ultraglobalprt.com/wheres-it-used/heathrow-t5/,Jan/12/2014. Accessed 15 Apr 2015

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1994a) Optimal design of multiple load case structures using an evolutionary procedure. Eng Comput 11:295–302

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1994b) A simple approach to structural frequency optimization. Comput Struct 53:1487–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1997) Evolutionary structural optimization. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Young V, Querin OM, Steven GP, Xie YM (1999) 3D and multiple load case Bi-Directional Evolutionary Optimization (BESO). Struct Optim 18:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully appreciate the support by the ShanHai Recreation Limited Company, and the MUST Automated Vehicle and Equipment Development Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Hung G. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, CH.G. Design of the lower chassis of a monorail personal rapid transit (MPRT) car using the evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) method. Struct Multidisc Optim 54, 165–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1383-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1383-0

Keywords

  • ESO
  • Chassis
  • FEA
  • Monorail
  • PRT