Abstract
In this paper a new approach to design sound phase diffusers is presented. The acoustic properties of such diffusers are usually increased by using single objective optimization methods. Here we propose the use of a multiobjective (MO) approach to design them in order to take into account several conflicting characteristic simultaneously. Three different MO problems are posed to consider various scenarios where fundamentally the objective is to maximize the normalized diffusion coefficient (following the corresponding Audio Engineering Society standard) for the so-called medium frequencies. This single objective could be divided into other several objectives to adjust performances to designer preferences. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (called ev-MOGA) is used to characterize the Pareto front in a smart way. ev-MOGA is modified, by using integer codification and tuning some of its genetic operators, to adapt it to the new requirements. Special interest is posed in selecting the diffusers codification properly to eliminate duplicities that would produce a multimodal problem. Precision in the manufacturing process is taking into account in the diffuser codification causing, that the number of different diffusers are quantified. Robust considerations related with the precision manufacturing process are considered in the decision making process. Finally, an optimal diffuser is selected considering designer preferences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We do not use an aggregate objective function, to merge the different objectives. So we will avoid to weight the different objectives a priori.
Available for MatlabⒸ at http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/31080-ev-moga-multiobjective-evolutionary-algorithm.
Maximizing an objective can be transformed in a minimization problem, since maxJ i = − min(−J i ).
Notice that \(\mathbf {\Theta }_{P}^{\ast }\) is not unique.
This codification is equivalent to characterize the diffusers as a vector of 6 increments. We do not codify the diffusers with increments since it is more difficult to manage the searching space and to implement genetic operators in the MOEA.
\(\boldsymbol {\Theta }_{t}(a,L)\simeq \frac {\boldsymbol {\Theta }(a,L)}{2}\) when a>10 for L = 7.
Based in the analyses of the Pareto front of Fig. 6a.
The subsets corresponding to the extreme of the Pareto front (represented by blue ’x’ in Fig. 12a) are not represented.
References
Coello. C, Veldhuizen D, Lamont G (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi- objective problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Cox TJ (1994) Predicting the scattering from reflectors and diffusers using 2d boundary elements methods. J Acoust Soc Am 96
Cox T J (1995) The optimization of profiled diffusers. J Acoust Soc. Am 97:2928–2936
Cox TJ, D’Antonio P (2009) Acoustic absorbers and diffusers. Theory, design and application. Second Edition, vol 290. Taylor & Francis, New York
Herrero JM (2006) Non-linear Robust identification using evolutionary algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnic University of Valencia
Herrero JM, et al. (2009) Optimization of sonic crystal attenuation properties by ev-MOGA multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization 39(2):203– 215
Herrero JM, Reynoso-Meza G, Martínez M, Blasco X, Sanchis J (2014) A Smart-Distributed Pareto Front Using the ev-MOGA Evolutionary Algorithm. Int J Artif Intell Tools 23(2)
Hughes RJ, Angus JAS, Cox TJ, Umnova O, Gehring GA, Pogson M, Whittaker DM (2010) Volumetric diffusers: Pseudorandom cylinder arrays on a periodic lattice. J Acoust Soc Am 128(5):2847–2856
ISO 17497-2 (2012) Acoustics: Sound-scattering properties of surfaces. Part 2: Measurement of the directional diffusion coefficient in a free field
Laumanns M, Thiele L, Deb K, Zitzler E (2002) Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Evol Comput 10(3):263–282
Mattson CA, Muller A, Messac A (2004) Smart Pareto Filter: Obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space. Eng Optim 36(6)
Mattson CA, Messac A. (2005) Pareto frontier based concept selection under uncertainty, with visualization. Optim Eng 6(1):85–115
Messac A (1996) Physical programming: Effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J 34(1):149–158
Miettinen KM (1998) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Redondo J, Pico R, Roig B, Avis MR (2007) Time domain simulation of sound diffusers using finite-difference schemes. Acta Acustica uw Acustica 93(4)
Sanchis J, Martínez MA, Blasco X, Reynoso-Meza G (2010) Modelling preferences in multiobjective engineering design. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:1255–1264
Schroeder MR (1975) Diffuse sound reflection by maximum-length sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 57(1):49– 150
Schroeder MR (1979) Binaural dissimilarity and optimum ceilings for concert halls: more lateral sound diffusion. J Acoust Soc Am 65:958–963
Schroeder MR (1980) Towards better acoustics for concert halls. Phys Today 33(10):24–30
Tusar T, Filipic B (2014) Visualization of pareto front approximations in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: A critical review and the prosection method. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary 19(2)
Zitzler E (1999) Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Methods and applications. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Acknowledgments
Partially supported by EVO-CONTROL project (ref. PROMETEO/2012/028, Generalitat Valenciana - Spain) and MEC (Spanish goverment) under grant N∘ MTM2012-36740-C02-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrero, J.M., Blasco, X., Sánchez-Pérez, J.V. et al. Design of sound phase diffusers by means of multiobjective optimization approach using ev-MOGA evolutionary algorithm. Struct Multidisc Optim 53, 861–879 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1367-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1367-0