Skip to main content
Log in

Local continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction for nonlinear analysis

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gradient-based optimization for large-scale, multidisciplinary design problems requires accurate and efficient sensitivity analysis to compute design derivatives. Presented here is a nonintrusive analytic sensitivity method, that is relatively easy to implement. Furthermore, it can be as accurate as conventional analytic sensitivity methods, which are intrusive and tend to be difficult, if not infeasible, to implement. The nonintrusive local continuum shape sensitivity method with spatial gradient reconstruction (SGR) is formulated for nonlinear systems. This is an extension of the formulation previously published for linear systems. SGR, a numerical technique used to approximate spatial derivatives, can be leveraged to implement the sensitivity method in a nonintrusive manner. The method is used to compute design derivatives for a variety of applications, including nonlinear static beam bending, nonlinear transient gust response of a 2-D beam structure, and nonlinear static bending of rectangular plates. To demonstrate that the method is nonintrusive, all analyses are conducted using black box solvers. One limiting requirement of the method is that it requires the converged Jacobian or tangent stiffness matrix as output from the analysis tool. For each example the design derivatives of the structural displacement response are verified with finite difference calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arora J, Haug E (1978) Design sensitivity analysis of elastic mechanical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 15:35–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arora J, Haug E (1979) Methods of design sensitivity analysis in structural optimization. AIAA J 17(9):79–4109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Borggaard J, Burns J (1994) A sensitivity equation approach to shape optimization in fluid flows. Technical Report, Langley Research Center

  • Borggaard J, Burns J (1997) A pde sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design. J Comput Phys:136

  • Choi K, Kim N H (2005) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization. Springer Science + Business Media

  • Cross D, Canfield RA (2012a) Solving continuum shape sensitivity with existing tools for nonlinear aeroelastic gust analysis. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA, Honolulu, pp 2012–1923

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross D, Canfield RA (2012b) Continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction of nonlinear aeroelastic gust response. In: 14th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. AIAA, Indianapolis, pp 2012–5597

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross D, Canfield RA (2013) Local continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction. Struct Multidiscip Optim J. (accepted with revisions)

  • Dems K, Haftka R (1989) Two approaches to sensitivity analysis for shape variation of structures. Mech Struct Mach 4:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dems K, Mroz Z (1985) Variational approach to first- and second-order sensitivity analysis of elastic structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 21

  • Duvigneau R, Pelletier D (2006) On accurate boundary conditions for a shape sensitivity equation method. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 50

  • Etienne S, Pelletier D (2005) General approach to sensitivity analysis of fluid-structure interactions. J Fluids Struct 21:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haftka RT, Adelman HM (1989) Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Struct Optim I

  • Haug EJ, Arora JS (1978) Design sensitivity analysis of elastic mechanical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 15:35–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson A (1988) Aerodynamic design via control theory. J Sci Comput 3:233–260

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson FP (2001) Sensorcraft–tomorrow’s eyes and ears of the warfighter. AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit. AIAA-2001-4370

  • Kulkarni MD, Cross DM, Canfield RA (2014) Discrete adjoint formulation for continuum sensitivity analysis. Technical note submitted to AIAA Journal

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2012) Continuum shape sensitivity method for fluid flow around an airfoil. In: 53rd AIAA/ ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA, Honolulu, pp 2012–1426

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2013a) Boundary velocity method for continuum shape sensitivity of nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problems. J Fluids Struct

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2013b) Two forms of continuum shape sensitivity method for fluid-structure interaction problems. To appear in AIAA J

  • Liu S, Canfield RA (2013c) Equivalence of continuum and discrete analytic sensitivity methods for nonlinear differential equations. To appear in Struct Multidiscip Optim J

  • Liu S, Wickert PD, Canfield RA (2010) Fluid-structure transient gust response sensitivity for a nonlinear joined wing model. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA, Orlando, pp 2010–3118

    Google Scholar 

  • MSC Software Corporation. Md nastran 2010: User defined services. MD Nastran Documentation (2010)

  • NASA Helios prototype. nasa dryden flight research center (2004). http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/ResearchUpdate/Helios/index.html http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/ResearchUpdate/Helios/index.html. [Online; accessed 27 Aug 2013]

  • Stanley L, Stewart D (2002) Design sensitivity analysis: computational issues of sensitivity equation methods. Academic Press

  • Turgeon E, Pelletier D, Borggaard J (1999) A continuous sensitivity equation approach to optimal design in mixed convection. AIAA:99–3625

  • Wickert D P (2009) Least-squares, continuous sensitivity analysis for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction. Dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology

  • Wickert DP, Canfield RA (2008) Least-squares continuous sensitivity analysis of an example fluid-structure interaction problem. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA, Schaumberg, pp 2008–1896

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickert DP, Canfield RA, Reddy JN (2008) Continuous sensitivity analysis of fluid-structure interaction problems using least-squares finite elements. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. AIAA, Victoria, pp 2008–5931

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickert DP, Canfield RA, Reddy JN (2009) Fluid-structure transient gust sensitivity using least-squares continuous sensitivity analysis. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA, Palm Springs, pp 2009–2535

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. part 1: the recovery technique. Int J Numer Methods Eng 33

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based on research sponsored by Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-09-2-3938. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of AFRL Senior Aerospace Engineers Dr. Raymond Kolonay, Dr. Ned Lindsley, and Dr. Jose Camberos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Cross.

Additional information

The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of Air Force Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cross, D.M., Canfield, R.A. Local continuum shape sensitivity with spatial gradient reconstruction for nonlinear analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 51, 849–865 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1178-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1178-8

Keywords

Navigation