Abstract
Probabilistic structural design deals with uncertainties in response (e.g. stresses) and capacity (e.g. failure stresses). The calculation of the structural response is typically expensive (e.g., finite element simulations), while the capacity is usually available from tests. Furthermore, the random variables that influence response and capacity are often disjoint. In previous work we have shown that this disjoint property can be used to reduce the cost of obtaining the probability of failure via Monte Carlo simulations. In this paper we propose to use this property for an approximate probabilistic optimization based on exact capacity and approximate response distributions (ECARD). In Approximate Probabilistic Optimization Using ECARD, the change in response distribution is approximated as the structure is re-designed while the capacity distribution is kept exact, thus significantly reducing the number of expensive response simulations. ECARD may be viewed as an extension of SORA (Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment), which proceeds with deterministic optimization iterations. In contrast, ECARD has probabilistic optimization iterations, but in each iteration, the response distribution is approximated so as not to require additional response calculations. The use of inexpensive probabilistic optimization allows easy incorporation of system reliability constraints and optimal allocation of risk between failure modes. The method is demonstrated using a beam problem and a ten-bar truss problem. The former allocates risk between two different failure modes, while the latter allocates risk between members. It is shown that ECARD provides most of the improvement from risk re-allocation that can be obtained from full probabilistic optimization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar E, Kumar S, Pippy RJ, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2007) Approximate probabilistic optimization using Exact-Capacity-Approximate-Response-Distribution (ECARD). In: AIAA paper 2007–1973, 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Waikiki, Hawaii, 23–26 April 2007
Ba-abbad MA, Nikolaidis E, Kapania RK (2006) New approach for system reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 44(5):1087–1096, May
Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. ASME J Mech Des 126(2):225–233
Elishakoff I, Haftka RT, Fang J (1994) Structural design under bounded uncertainty—optimization with anti-optimization. Comput Struct 53(6):1401–1405
Haftka RT, Gurdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization, 3rd edn. Kluwer, New York
Little RE (2003) Mechanical reliability improvement. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 473–479
Melchers RE (2002a) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York, p 17, Eq. (1.18)
Melchers RE (2002b) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York, pp 157–158
Nikolaidis E, Saleem S, Farizal, Zhang, Mourelatos Z (2008) Probabilistic reanalysis using Monte Carlo simulation. SAE Special Publication 2170, paper No. 2008-01-0215, pp 1–14
Qu X, Haftka RT (2004) Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor. J Struct Multidisc Opt 27(5):314–325
Smarslok BP, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2006) Taking advantage of conditional limit states in sampling procedures. AIAA Paper 2006-1632, 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Newport, RI, May 2006
Wu YT, Shin Y, Sues R, Cesare M (2001) Safety Factor Based Approach for Probability-based Design Optimization. In: Proceedings of 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Seattle, WA, 2001, AIAA Paper 2001-1522
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Pippy, R.J., Acar, E. et al. Approximate probabilistic optimization using exact-capacity-approximate-response-distribution (ECARD). Struct Multidisc Optim 38, 613–626 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0310-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0310-z