Abstract
The calculation of ballast plan in load-out operations is generally performed assuming a rigid barge. This assumption may not be reliable since in reality the barge is flexible. Having incorrect ballast plan may lead to overstressing of the loaded-out structure. We present a method of finding a more accurate ballast plan, taking into account the flexibility of the barge. This method makes use of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to find the optimum ballast arrangement at every load-out stage. We model the load-out configuration as a beam on elastic foundation, loaded with distributed trapezoidal loading representing the load from the structure. Minimizing deflection and curvature of the beam, as well as maximizing the ballast transfer efficiency between the load-out stages are chosen as the objectives of the algorithm. It is shown that the proposed method is better than the conventional rigid barge method in terms of minimizing the deflection and curvature as well as maximizing the ballast transfer efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
API RP 2A–WSD (2000) Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms—working stress design, 21st edn
Chakrabarti, SK (2005) Handbook of offshore engineering, vol 2. Elsevier
Curtis WB, Gilmore LA (1992) Garden Bnks 189 “A” deepwater jacket project. In: Proceedings of 24th annual offshore technology conference (held in Houston, Texas), pp 65–72
Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley
Deb K (2007) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization without additional parameters. In: Lobo FG, Lima CF, Michalewicz Z (eds) Parameter setting in evolutionary algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–257
Ferguson N, Zarate H, Kitani T, Inokoshi O, Masuda S (1983) An analytical study and systematic monitoring procedure developed for the load-out operation of the North Rankin Jacket ‘A’. In: Proceedings of 15th annual offshore technology conference (held in Houston, Texas), pp 497–504
Hetényi M (1974) Beams on elastic foundation. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Hofferber JE, MacLeod NA, McGarragh TG, Ruhl GL, Thibeaux JF (1991) Loadout, transportation, and installation of the harmony and heritage jackets. In: Proceedings of 23rd annual offshore technology conference (held in Houston, Texas), pp 371–380
Kenney JJ, Knoll DA, Brooks A, Crimmins DM, Wilkinson G, Danos JH (1994) Loadout of auger deck and hull-deck mating operations. In: Proceedings of 26th annual offshore technology conference (held in Houston, Texas), pp 409–418
Liu J, Gho WM (2005) Consideration of barge flexibility in loadout operation. Tech. rep., Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Nebro AJ, Durillo JJ, Luna F, Dorronsoro B, Alba E (2006) A cellular genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Pelta DA, Krasnogor N (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (held in Granada, Spain), pp 25–36
Noble Denton Report No. 0013/NDI (2004) Guidelines for loadouts. Noble Denton International. http://www.nobledenton.com/files/guidelines/0013-3.pdf. Accessed 5 September 2007
Piter ES, Digre KA, Tabone RM (1989) Bullwinkle loadout analysis. In: Proceedings of 21st annual offshore technology conference (held in Houston, Texas), pp 469–478
Ultramarine (2007) Loadout. Ultramarine. http://www.ultramarine.com/hdesk/runs/samples/install/loadout.htm. Accessed 29 January 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurniawan, A., Ma, G. Optimization of ballast plan in launch jacket load-out. Struct Multidisc Optim 38, 267–288 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0287-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0287-7