Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiobjective shape optimization of speed humps

  • Industrial Application
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to the shape optimization of road speed humps. The proposed approach is based on multiobjective genetic optimization of the hump profile while taking into account the separation phenomenon, which occurs when the front tires of the vehicle momentarily lose contact with the road surface. The optimization is carried out for speeds up to twice the authorized speed (throughout this article, the term authorized speed refers to speed limits enforced in speed reduction [bump] areas of the roads) rather than for illegally high speeds as adopted by many of the previous works. A 6-degree of freedom non-linear dynamic model is used to identify the speeds at which separation occurs, and hump profiles associated with these speeds are discarded as infeasible solutions. Three independent objective functions are selected for optimization. They include the maximum vertical acceleration experienced by the driver when crossing the hump below the authorized speed limit (to be minimized), the same vertical acceleration at speeds above the authorized speed (to be maximized), and the ascending ratio of the “speed—vertical acceleration” curve (to be maximized). These objective functions are evaluated for more than 10,000 humps of two popular profile types (sinusoidal and flat top with straight ramps) and optimum profiles for three speed limits of 20, 25, and 30km/h are determined using the multiobjective nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II. As a result, a Pareto front of at least ten optimal points is achieved for each of the two hump profile types. Furthermore, to incorporate the economical aspects of the real-world problem, Pareto optimal points for the two profile types were compared based on their lateral section areas (an indication of the manufacturing cost). The comparison shows that sinusoidal humps more often than not outdo their flat top rivals economically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark DE (2000) All-way stops versus speed humps: which is more effective at slowing traffic speeds? In: Proceedings of the ITE Annual Meeting Compendium

  • Clement J (1983) Speed humps and the Thousand Oaks experience. ITE J 53:35–39 (January)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Agarwal RB (1995) Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Syst 9:115–148

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K et al (2002) A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R (1999) Traffic calming state of practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fwa TF, Liaw CY (1992) Rational approach for geometric design of speed-control road humps. Transp Res Rec 1356:66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Fwa TF, Tan LS (1992) Geometric characterization of road humps for speed-control design. J Transp Eng 118:593–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITE (1997) Traffic engineering council speed humps task force. Guidelines for the design and application for speed humps. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JR (1992) An investigation of road humps for use on bus routes. Research Report ARR no. 222. Australian Road Research Board, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Khorshid E, Alfares M (2004) A numerical study on the optimal geometric design of speed control humps. Eng Optim 36(1):77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorshid E, Alfares M (2007) Model refinement and experimental evaluation for optimal design of speed humps. Int J Veh Syst Model Test 2(1):80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson RW (2003) The objections to speed humps. Bromley Borough Roads Action Group, London (Submission to the London Assembly)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moinat P (1991) Étude et Simulation du Passage d’un Véhicule Sur un Dos d’Âne: prédiction de l’Inconfort [A study and simulation of vehicle passage on speed humps: prediction of discomfort]. Master of Engineering Thesis, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada

  • Nikkhah Bahrami M (2002) Theory of vibration with application in engineering. University of Tehran, Iran (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen NL (1998) Shape optimization of a vehicle speed control bump. J Struct Mech 26:319–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuwanshi MM, Kakde OG (2004) Survey on multiobjective evolutionary and real coded genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, 6–7 December 2004, Cairns, Australia

  • Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Int J Evol Comput 2:221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts GR (1973) Road humps for the control of vehicle speeds. Transport and Road Research Laboratory Report no. 597. Department of Environment and Department of Transport, Crowthorne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber P, Braaksma J (2000) Towards a North American geometric design standard for speed humps. ITE J 70(1):30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou K et al (2000) Robust and optimal control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Shariatpanahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansari Ardeh, H., Shariatpanahi, M. & Nikkhah Bahrami, M. Multiobjective shape optimization of speed humps. Struct Multidisc Optim 37, 203–214 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0226-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0226-7

Keywords

Navigation