Skip to main content
Log in

Aero-structural optimization using adjoint coupled post-optimality sensitivities

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new subspace optimization method for performing aero-structural design is introduced. The method relies on a semi-analytic adjoint approach to the sensitivity analysis that includes post-optimality sensitivity information from the structural optimization subproblem. The resulting coupled post-optimality sensitivity approach is used to guide a gradient-based optimization algorithm. The new approach simplifies the system-level problem, thereby reducing the number of calls to a potentially costly aerodynamics solver. The aero-structural optimization of an aircraft wing is performed using linear aerodynamic and structural analyses, and a performance comparison is made between the new approach and the conventional multidisciplinary feasible method. The new asymmetric suboptimization method is found to be the more efficient approach when it adequately reduces the number of system evaluations or when there is a large enough discrepancy between disciplinary solution times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun RD, Kroo IM, Gage PJ (1993) Post-optimality analysis in aerospace vehicle design. In: Proceedings of the AIAA aircraft design, systems and operations meeting, Monterey. CA, AIAA, pp 93–3932

  • Braun RD, Gage PJ, Kroo IM, Sobieski IP (1996) Implementation and performance issues in collaborative optimization. AIAA Paper pp 96–4017

  • Chattopadhyay A, Pagaldipti N (1995) A multidisciplinary optimization using semi-analytical sensitivity analysis procedure and multilevel decomposition. Comput Math Appl 29(7):55–66

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer EJ, Dennis JE, Frank PD, Lewis RM, Shubin GR (1994) Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. SIAM J Optim 4(4):754–776, http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/article/cramer93problem.html

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Giunta AA (2000) A novel sensitivity analysis method for high fidelity multidisciplinary optimization of aero-structural systems. AIAA Paper 2000–0683

  • Kodiyalam S, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (2002) Bilevel integrated system synthesis with response surfaces. AIAA J 38(8):1479–1485

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroo IM (1997) MDO for large-scale design. In: Multidisciplinary design optimization: state-of-the-art, SIAM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins JRRA, Alonso JJ, Reuther JJ (2004) High-fidelity aerostructural design optimization of a supersonic business jet. J Aircr 41(3):523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins JRRA, Alonso JJ, Reuther JJ (2005) A coupled-adjoint sensitivity analysis method for high-fidelity aero-structural design. Optim Eng 6(1):33–62, http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/1389-4420/contents

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martins JRRA, Sturdza P, Alonso JJ (2003) The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Trans Math Softw 29(3):245–262, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/838250.838251

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C (2001) Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems. AIAA J 39(11):2051–2061

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon NMK, Martins JRRA (2007) An adaptive approach to constraint aggregation using adjoint sensitivity analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 30(1):61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieski IP, Kroo IM (2000) Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation. AIAA J 38(10):1931–1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1990) Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems. AIAA J 28(1):153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka RT (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Optim 14(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Agte JS, Robert R, Sandusky J (1998) Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS). AIAA Paper 98–4916

  • Squire W, Trapp G (1998) Using complex variables to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Rev 40(1):110–112, http://epubs.siam.org/sam-bin/dbq/article/31241

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tedford NP, Martins JRRA (2006) On the common structure of MDO problems: a comparison of architectures. In: Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Portsmouth, VA, AIAA 2006-7080

  • Tribes C, Dube JF, Trépanier JY (2005) Decomposition of multidisciplinary optimization problems: formulations and application to a simplified wing design. Eng Optim 37(8):775–796

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian R. Chittick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chittick, I.R., Martins, J.R.R.A. Aero-structural optimization using adjoint coupled post-optimality sensitivities. Struct Multidisc Optim 36, 59–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0200-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0200-9

Keywords

Navigation