Skip to main content
Log in

An augmented Lagrangian decomposition method for quasi-separable problems in MDO

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several decomposition methods have been proposed for the distributed optimal design of quasi-separable problems encountered in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO). Some of these methods are known to have numerical convergence difficulties that can be explained theoretically. We propose a new decomposition algorithm for quasi-separable MDO problems. In particular, we propose a decomposed problem formulation based on the augmented Lagrangian penalty function and the block coordinate descent algorithm. The proposed solution algorithm consists of inner and outer loops. In the outer loop, the augmented Lagrangian penalty parameters are updated. In the inner loop, our method alternates between solving an optimization master problem and solving disciplinary optimization subproblems. The coordinating master problem can be solved analytically; the disciplinary subproblems can be solved using commonly available gradient-based optimization algorithms. The augmented Lagrangian decomposition method is derived such that existing proofs can be used to show convergence of the decomposition algorithm to Karush–Kuhn–Tucker points of the original problem under mild assumptions. We investigate the numerical performance of the proposed method on two example problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrov NM, Lewis RM (2002) Analytical and computational aspects of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design. AIAA J 40(2):301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison JT, Kokkalaras M, Zawislak MR, Papalambros PY (2005) On the use of analytical target cascading and collaborative optimization for complex system design. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Arora JS, Chahande AI, Paeng J (1991) Multiplier methods for engineering optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 32(7):1485–1525

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balling RJ, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1996) Optimization of coupled systems: a critical overview of approaches. AIAA J 34(1):6–17

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (1993) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas DP (1982) Constrained optimization and lagrange multiplier methods. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas DP (2003) Nonlinear programming, 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Belmont, Massachusetts (2nd printing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas DP, Tsitsiklis JN (1989) Parallel and distributed computation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC, Hathaway R (2002) Some notes on alternating optimization. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2275:288–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun RD (1996) Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University

  • Braun RD, Moore AA, Kroo IM (1997) Collaborative approach to launch vehicle design. J Spacecr Rockets 34:478–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer EJ, Dennis JE, Frank PD, Lewis RM, Shubin GR (1994) Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. SIAM J Optim 4(4):754–776

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel AV, Murray W (2000) An analysis of collaborative optimization methods. In: Eight AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA Paper 00-4720

  • DeMiguel AV, Murray W (2006) A local convergence analysis of bilevel decomposition algorithms. Optim Eng 7:99–133

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M, Glowinski R (1983) Augmented lagrangian methods: application to the numerical solution of boundary-value problems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill PE, Murray W, Wright MH (1981) Practical optimization. Academic, London, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Golinski J (1970) Optimal synthesis problems solved by means of nonlinear programming and random methods. J Mech 5:287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haftka RT, Watson LT (2005) Multidisciplinary design optimization with quasiseparable subsystems. Optim Eng 6:9–20

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström K, Göran AO, Edvall MM (2004) User’s guide for TOMLAB 4.2. Tomlab Optimization Inc., San Diego CA. http://tomlab.biz (website date of access: 23 November 2006)

  • Kim HM (2001) Target cascading in optimal system design. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan

  • Kokkolaras M, Fellini R, Kim HM, Michelena NF, Papalambros PY (2002) Extension of the target cascading formulation to the design of product families. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 24(4):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Haftka RT, Watson LT (2004) Global–local structural optimization using response surfaces of local optimization margins. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 27(5):352–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalek JJ, Papalambros PY (2005a) An efficient weighting update method to achieve acceptable inconsistency deviation in analytical target cascading. ASME J Mech Des 127:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalek JJ, Papalambros PY (2005b) Technical brief: weights, norms, and notation in analytical target cascading. ASME J Mech Des 127:499–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelena N, Kim HM, Papalambros PY (1999) A system partitioning and optimization approach to target cascading. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on engineering design, Munich, Germany

  • Michelena NF, Park H, Papalambros PY (2003) Convergence properties of analytical target cascading. AIAA J 41(5):897–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieski IP, Kroo I (2000) Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation. AIAA J 38(10):1931–1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1988) Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems. In: 2nd NASA Air Force symposium on recent advances in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Hampton, Virginia, NASA-CP 3031

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Agte JS, Sandusky Jr RR (2000) Bilevel integrated system synthesis. AIAA J 38(1):164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Altus TD, Phillips M, Sandusky Jr RR (2003) Bilevel integrated system synthesis for concurrent and distributed processing. AIAA J 41(10):1996–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosserams S (2004) Analytical target cascading: Convergence improvement by subproblem post-optimality sensitivities. Master’s thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, SE-420389

  • Tosserams S, Etman LFP, Papalambros PY, Rooda JE (2006) An augmented lagrangian relaxation for analytical target cascading using the alternating direction method of multipliers. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 31(3):176–189. DOI 10.1007/s00158-005-0579-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzevelekos N, Kokkolaras M, Papalambros PY, Hulshof MF, Etman LFP, Rooda JE (2003) An empirical local convergence study of alternative coordination schemes in analytical target cascading. In: Proceedings of the 5th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Lido di Jesolo, Venice, Italy

  • Wagner TC (1993) A general decomposition methodology for optimal system design. Ph.D. thesis, Univerisy of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Tosserams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tosserams, S., Etman, L.F.P. & Rooda, J.E. An augmented Lagrangian decomposition method for quasi-separable problems in MDO. Struct Multidisc Optim 34, 211–227 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0077-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0077-z

Keywords

Navigation