Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A probabilistic sufficiency factor approach is proposed that combines safety factor and probability of failure. The probabilistic sufficiency factor approach represents a factor of safety relative to a target probability of failure. It provides a measure of safety that can be used more readily than the probability of failure or the safety index by designers to estimate the required weight increase to reach a target safety level. The probabilistic sufficiency factor can be calculated from the results of Monte Carlo simulation with little extra computation. The paper presents the use of probabilistic sufficiency factor with a design response surface approximation, which fits it as a function of design variables. It is shown that the design response surface approximation for the probabilistic sufficiency factor is more accurate than that for the probability of failure or for the safety index. Unlike the probability of failure or the safety index, the probabilistic sufficiency factor does not suffer from accuracy problems in regions of low probability of failure when calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. The use of the probabilistic sufficiency factor accelerates the convergence of reliability-based design optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birger, I.A. 1970: Safety Factors and Diagnostics. Problems of Mechanics of Solid Bodies, 71–82, Leningrad: Sudostroenve (in Russian)

  2. Bucher, C.G; Bourgund, U. 1990: A Fast and Efficient Response Surface Approach for Structural Reliability Problems. Struct Safety7, 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elishakoff, I. 2001: Interrelation between Safety Factors and Reliability. NASA/CR-2001-211309

  4. Fox, E.P. 1993: Methods of Integrating Probabilistic Design within an Organization’s Design System Using Box-Behnken Matrices. Proc. of 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Struct. Dyn., Mater. Conf. (held in LaJolla, CA, USA), 714–723, AIAA-1993-1380

  5. Fox, E.P. 1994: The Pratt & Whitney Probabilistic Design System. Proc. of 35th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Struct. Dyn., Mater. Conf. (held in Hilton Head, SC, USA), 1075–1085, AIAA-1994-1442

  6. Fox, E.P. 1996: Issues in Utilizing Response Surface Methodologies for Accurate Probabilistic Design. Proc. of 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Struct. Dyn., Mater. Conf. (held in Salt Lake City, UT, USA), 1615–1622, AIAA-1996-1496

  7. Freudenthal, A.M. 1962: Safety, Reliability and Structural Design. ASCE Trans127, 304–323

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khuri, A.I.; Cornell, J.A. 1996: Response surfaces: designs and analyses. 2th edn. New York: Marcel Dekker

  9. Melchers, R.E. 1999: Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. New York: Wiley

  10. Myers, H.R.; Montgomery, D.C. 1995: Response Surface Methodology. New York: Wiley

  11. Qu, X.; Venkataraman, S.; Haftka, R.T.; Johnson, T.F. 2003: Deterministic and Reliability-based Optimization of Composite Laminates for Cryogenic Environments. AIAA J.41, 2029–2036

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qu, X.; Haftka, R.T. 2003: Design under Uncertainty Using Monte Carlo Simulation and Probabilistic Sufficiency Factor. Proc. of ASME DETC’03 Conf. (held in Chicago, IL, USA)

  13. Rackwitz, R. 2000: Reliability Analysis – Past, Present and Future. Proc. of 8th ASCE Specialty Conf. on Probab. Mech. and Struct. Reliab. (held in South Bend, IN, USA), PMC 2000-RRR

  14. Rajashekhar, M.R.; Ellingwood, B.R. 1993: A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Struct Safety12, 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  15. Romero, V.J.; Bankston, S.D. 1998: Efficient Monte Carlo probability estimation with finite element response surfaces built from progressive lattice sampling. Proc. of 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Struct. Dyn., Mater. Conf. (held in Long Beach, CA, USA), 1103–1119, AIAA-1998-1826

  16. Sues, R.H.; Oakley, D.R.; Rhodes, G.S. 1996: Portable Parallel Computing for Multidisciplinary Stochastic Optimization of Aeropropulsion Components. Final Report, NASA Contract NAS3-27288

  17. Sues, R.; Casare, M.; Pageau, S.; Wu, Y-T. 2000: Reliability Based MDO for Aerospace Systems. Proc. of 8th Symp. on Multidisc. Anal. Optim. (held in Long Beach, CA, USA), AIAA-2000-4804

  18. Tu, J.; Choi, K.K.; Park, Y.H. 2000: “Design Potential Method for Robust System Parameter Design,”AIAA J.39, 667–677

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, Y-T.; Wang, W. 1998: Efficient Probabilistic Design by Converting Reliability Constraints to Approximately Equivalent Deterministic Constraints, J Integr Des Process Sci2, 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, Y-T.; Shin, Y.; Sues, R.; Cesare, M. 2001: Safety-Factor Based Approach for Probability-based Design optimization. Proc. of 42th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Struct. Dyn., Mater. Conf. (held in Seattle, WA, USA), AIAA-2001-1522

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Qu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qu, X., Haftka , R. Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor. Struct Multidisc Optim 27, 314–325 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0390-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0390-3

Keywords

Navigation