Skip to main content
Log in

Topology optimization of rubber isolators considering static and dynamic behaviours

  • Industrial applications
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A topology optimization for the design of rubber vibration isolators is proposed. Many vibration isolators are made of rubbers and they operate under small oscillatory load superimposed on large static deformation. Vibration isolators must have a certain degree of static stiffness in order to endure the static loading due to large gravitational and inertial forces. On the other hand, isolators must have a small dynamic stiffness in order to reduce the force transmission from vibrating systems to base structures. Therefore both the static and dynamic behaviours of rubber should be simultaneously considered in the design process. The static behaviours of rubber under large and slow loads are generally treated with hyperelastic constitutive models. Rubber under fast dynamic loads can be modelled as a viscoelastic material. In this paper, the steady state viscoelastic model, which is suggested by Kim and Youn and correctly predicts the influence of the pre-strain on the relaxation function, is applied for the dynamic analysis. The continuum-based design sensitivity analyses (DSA) of both the static hyperelastic model and dynamic viscoelastic model are developed. The topology optimization formulation is proposed in order to generate the system layouts considering both the static and dynamic performance. The density distribution approach and sequentially linear programming (SLP) are used as the optimization algorithms. Some design examples are presented in order to verify the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashrafiuon, H. 1993: Design optimization of aircraft engine-mount systems. J Vib Acoust 115, 463–467

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, S.-Y.; Cho, J.-H.; Youn, S.-K.; Kim, C.-S.; Oh, D.-H. 2001: Topology Optimization of a HDD Actuator Arm. Comput Struct Eng 1, 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi, K.K.; Duan, W. 2000: Design sensitivity analysis and shape optimization of structural components with hyperelastic material. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187, 219–243

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christensen, R.M. 1982: Theory of viscoelasticity. New York: Academic press

  5. Jung, G.D.; Youn, S.K.; Kim, B.K. 2000: A three dimensional nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive model of solid propellant. Int J Solids Struct 37, 4715–4732

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ki, S.H.; Wang, S.M. 2001: Topology optimization of hyperelastic material. Proc. 4th World Cong. of structural and multidisciplinary optimization

  7. Kim, B.-K.; Youn, S.-K. 2001: A viscoelastic constitutive model of rubber under small oscillatory loads superimposed on large static deformation. Arch Appl Mech 71, 748–763

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, B.-K.; Youn, S.-K.; Lee, W.-S. 2002: FEA of rubber under small steady state vibration superimposed on large static deformation. Proc. 34-th Solid Mechanics Conf., 131–132

  9. Kim, J.J.; Kim, H.Y. 1997: Shape design of an engine mount by a method of parameter optimization. Comput Struct 65, 725–731

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mason, P. 1959: The viscoelastic behavior of rubber in extension. J Appl Polym Sci 1, 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morman, K.N.; Nagtegaal, J.C. 1983: Finite element analysis of sinusoidal small-amplitude vibrations in deformed viscoelastic solids. Part I: theoretical development. Int J Numer Methods Eng 19, 1079–1103

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sigmund, O.; Petersson, J. 1998: Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependence and local minima. Struct Optim 16, 68–75

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simo, J.C. 1987: A fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: formulation and computational aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 60, 153–173

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sulivan, J.I.; Morman, K.N.; Pett, R.A. 1980: A non-linear viscoelastic characterization of a natural rubber gum vulcanizate. Rubber Chem Technol 53, 805–822

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sussman, T.; Bathe, K.J. 1987: A finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis. Comput Struct 26, 357–409

    Google Scholar 

  16. Truesdell, C.; Noll, W. 1965: The non-linear field theories of mechanics. In: Flugge, S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Physics. New York: Springer.

  17. Voet, A.; Morawski, J.C. 1974: Dynamic mechanical and electrical properties of vulcanizates at elongations up to sample rupture. Rubber Chem Technol 47, 765–777

    Google Scholar 

  18. Youn, S.-K.; Park, S.-H. 1997: A Study on the Shape Extraction Process in the Structural Topology Optimization using Homogenized Material. Comput Struct 62, 527–538

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, Y.; Naganathan, N.G.; Dukkipati, R.V. 2001: A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems. Mech Mach Theory 36, 123–142

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zdunek, A.B. 1992: Determination of material response functions for prestrained rubbers. Rheologica Acta 31, 575–591

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zdunek, A.B. 1993: Theory and computation of the steady state harmonic response of viscoelastic rubber parts. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 105, 63–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.-K. Youn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, WS., Youn , SK. Topology optimization of rubber isolators considering static and dynamic behaviours. Struct Multidisc Optim 27, 284–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0376-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0376-1

Keywords

Navigation