Skip to main content
Log in

Topology optimization of frame structures with flexible joints

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method for structural topology optimization of frame structures with flexible joints is presented. A typical frame structure is a set of beams and joints assembled to carry an applied load. The problem considered in this paper is to find the stiffest frame for a given mass. By introducing design variables for beams and joints, a mass distribution for optimal structural stiffness can be found. Each beam can have several design variables connected to its cross section. One of these is an area-type design variable which is used to represent the global size of the beam. The other design variables are of length ratio type, controlling the cross section of the beam. Joints are flexible elements connecting the beams in the structure. Each joint has stiffness properties and a mass. A framework for modelling these stiffnesses is presented and design variables for joints are introduced. We prove a theorem which can be interpreted as the fact that the removal of structural elements, e.g. joints or beams, can be modelled by a small strictly positive material amount assigned to the element. This is needed for the computations of sensitivities used in the applied gradient based iterative method. Both two and three dimensional problems, as well as multiple load cases and multiple mass constraints, are treated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achtziger, W. 1998: Multiple-load truss topology and sizing optimization: Some properties of minimax compliance. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 98, 255–280

    Google Scholar 

  2. Achtziger, W. 1999: Local stability of trusses in the context of topology optimization Part I: Exact modelling. Struct. Optim. 17, 235–246

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argyris, J.H.; Balmer, H.; Doltsinis, J.St.; Dunne, P.C.; Haase, M.; Kleiber, M.; Malejannakis, G.A.; Mlejnek, H.-P.; Müller, M.; Scharpf, D.W. 1979: Finite element method – The natural approach. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 17/18, 1–106

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aubin, J.-P.; Frankowska, H. 1990: Set-Valued Analysis. Boston: Birkhäuser

  5. Bazaraa, M.S.; Sherali, H.D.; Shetty, C.M. 1993: Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms. New York: John Wiley and Sons

  6. Bendsøe, M.P. 1995: Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, and Material. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag

  7. Bendsøe, M.P.; Ben-Tal, A.; Zowe, J. 1994: Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design. Struct. Optim. 7, 141–159

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron, T.M.; Thirunavukarasu, A.C.; El-Sayed, M.E.M. 2000: Optimization of frame structures with flexible joints. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 19, 204–213

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, G.D.; Guo, X. 1997: ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization. Struct. Optim. 13, 258–266

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daniel, J.W. 1973: Stability of the solution of definite quadratic programs. Math. Program. 5, 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eschenauer, H.A.; Olhoff, N. 2001: Topology optimization of continuum structures: A review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 54, 331–390

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fredricson, H. 2002: Optimization methods for vehicle body structures. Int. Rep. LIU-TEK-LIC, 2002: 24 Dept. Mech. Eng., Linköping University

  13. Jivotovski, G. 2000: A gradient based heuristic algorithm and its application to discrete optimization of bar structures. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 19, 237–248

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonsson, D.; Johansen, T. 1997: Conceptual design of a gearbox housing using topology optimization. Thesis work carried out at Volvo Technological Development, Int. Rep. LiTH–IKP–EX–1447, Dept. Mech. Eng., Linköping University

  15. Memari, A.M.; Madhkan, M. 1999: Optimal design of steel frames subject to gravity and seismic codes’ prescribed lateral forces. Struct. Optim. 18, 56–66

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nishigaki, H.; Nishiwaki, S.; Amago, T.; Kojima, Y.; Kikuchi, N. 2001: First order analysis – new CAE tools for automotive body designers. SAE Paper, No. 2001-01-0768

  17. Sergeyev, O.; Pedersen, P. 1996: On design of joint positions for minimum mass 3D frames. Struct. Optim. 11, 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sergeyev, O.; Mroz, Z. 1998: Optimal joint positions and stiffness distribution for minimum mass frames with damping constraints. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 16, 231–245

    Google Scholar 

  19. Svanberg, K. 1987: The method of moving asymptotes – a new method for structural optimization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 24, 359–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Fredricson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fredricson , H., Johansen , T., Klarbring , A. et al. Topology optimization of frame structures with flexible joints. Struct Multidisc Optim 25, 199–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0281-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0281-z

Keywords

Navigation